P20新冠肺炎支持出院:利物浦体验

L. Humphreys, A. G. Gálvez González, M. Hammond, S. Jones, J. Hadcroft, G. Brocklehurst
{"title":"P20新冠肺炎支持出院:利物浦体验","authors":"L. Humphreys, A. G. Gálvez González, M. Hammond, S. Jones, J. Hadcroft, G. Brocklehurst","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Liverpool Community Respiratory team (CRT) is a multi-professional team supporting patients with COPD exacerbations to reduce hospital admissions and length of stay. During the first wave of the Covid 19 pandemic, CRT piloted a service to support and monitor patients hospitalised with covid 19 pneumonia on discharge. Patients were provided with telehealth equipment for remote physiological monitoring, and were called daily by a member of the team. Results 157 patients (87 male, mean age 59.7, range 21–88) were supported by the CRT covid discharge service between May 2020 and May 2021. 11 (7%) were readmitted, 4 withdrew and 1 died at home. 141 completed 10–14 days of support. Mean hospital stay was 13.7 days (range 11–112). 8 were current smokers, 52 were ex smokers and 87 had never smoked. Mean BMI was 31.4 (range 18.5–54.5). Chair based exercises were introduced early and 141 were offered pulmonary rehabilitation, of whom 135 (95.7%) agreed to a referral; only 6 declined. Feedback from all patients supported by CRT was positive. We noted that anxiety levels improved subjectively during the period of CRT support so introduced GAD7 to further assess this. Although 28 patients achieved the minimal clinically significant difference, this was not seen consistently across the group. Conclusions Supported discharge after hospitalisation with covid pneumonia is safe and well-liked by patients. Readmissions were rare and pulmonary rehabilitation uptake was high. There may be some benefit in term of anxiety management, but numbers were too low for this to be proven.","PeriodicalId":319670,"journal":{"name":"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P20 Covid supported discharge: a Liverpool experience\",\"authors\":\"L. Humphreys, A. G. Gálvez González, M. Hammond, S. Jones, J. Hadcroft, G. Brocklehurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The Liverpool Community Respiratory team (CRT) is a multi-professional team supporting patients with COPD exacerbations to reduce hospital admissions and length of stay. During the first wave of the Covid 19 pandemic, CRT piloted a service to support and monitor patients hospitalised with covid 19 pneumonia on discharge. Patients were provided with telehealth equipment for remote physiological monitoring, and were called daily by a member of the team. Results 157 patients (87 male, mean age 59.7, range 21–88) were supported by the CRT covid discharge service between May 2020 and May 2021. 11 (7%) were readmitted, 4 withdrew and 1 died at home. 141 completed 10–14 days of support. Mean hospital stay was 13.7 days (range 11–112). 8 were current smokers, 52 were ex smokers and 87 had never smoked. Mean BMI was 31.4 (range 18.5–54.5). Chair based exercises were introduced early and 141 were offered pulmonary rehabilitation, of whom 135 (95.7%) agreed to a referral; only 6 declined. Feedback from all patients supported by CRT was positive. We noted that anxiety levels improved subjectively during the period of CRT support so introduced GAD7 to further assess this. Although 28 patients achieved the minimal clinically significant difference, this was not seen consistently across the group. Conclusions Supported discharge after hospitalisation with covid pneumonia is safe and well-liked by patients. Readmissions were rare and pulmonary rehabilitation uptake was high. There may be some benefit in term of anxiety management, but numbers were too low for this to be proven.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利物浦社区呼吸团队(CRT)是一个多专业团队,支持COPD加重患者减少住院次数和住院时间。在第一波Covid - 19大流行期间,CRT试行了一项服务,以支持和监测因Covid - 19肺炎住院的患者出院时的情况。为患者提供远程医疗设备,用于远程生理监测,并由一名小组成员每天来电。结果2020年5月至2021年5月,157例患者(男性87例,平均年龄59.7岁,年龄范围21 ~ 88岁)接受CRT新冠出院服务。11例(7%)再次入院,4例出院,1例在家中死亡。141个完成了10-14天的支持。平均住院时间为13.7天(范围11-112天)。8人目前吸烟,52人曾经吸烟,87人从未吸烟。平均BMI为31.4(范围18.5-54.5)。早期引入了基于椅子的锻炼,141人接受了肺部康复治疗,其中135人(95.7%)同意转诊;只有6人拒绝。所有患者的反馈都是积极的。我们注意到主观焦虑水平在CRT支持期间有所改善,因此引入GAD7来进一步评估这一点。虽然有28名患者达到了最小的临床显著差异,但这在整个组中并不一致。结论新冠肺炎住院后支持出院是安全的,受到患者的欢迎。再入院率低,肺部康复率高。在焦虑管理方面可能会有一些好处,但数量太少,无法证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P20 Covid supported discharge: a Liverpool experience
Introduction The Liverpool Community Respiratory team (CRT) is a multi-professional team supporting patients with COPD exacerbations to reduce hospital admissions and length of stay. During the first wave of the Covid 19 pandemic, CRT piloted a service to support and monitor patients hospitalised with covid 19 pneumonia on discharge. Patients were provided with telehealth equipment for remote physiological monitoring, and were called daily by a member of the team. Results 157 patients (87 male, mean age 59.7, range 21–88) were supported by the CRT covid discharge service between May 2020 and May 2021. 11 (7%) were readmitted, 4 withdrew and 1 died at home. 141 completed 10–14 days of support. Mean hospital stay was 13.7 days (range 11–112). 8 were current smokers, 52 were ex smokers and 87 had never smoked. Mean BMI was 31.4 (range 18.5–54.5). Chair based exercises were introduced early and 141 were offered pulmonary rehabilitation, of whom 135 (95.7%) agreed to a referral; only 6 declined. Feedback from all patients supported by CRT was positive. We noted that anxiety levels improved subjectively during the period of CRT support so introduced GAD7 to further assess this. Although 28 patients achieved the minimal clinically significant difference, this was not seen consistently across the group. Conclusions Supported discharge after hospitalisation with covid pneumonia is safe and well-liked by patients. Readmissions were rare and pulmonary rehabilitation uptake was high. There may be some benefit in term of anxiety management, but numbers were too low for this to be proven.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
P20 Covid supported discharge: a Liverpool experience P23 Implementing a daily virtual COVID-19 multi-disciplinary team meeting in secondary care P25 The effect of post COVID-19 rehabilitation on health status using the EQ-5D- 5L P21 Development of a COVID-19 virtual ward to facilitate early discharge from hospital for patients with an on-going oxygen requirement P19 COVID Virtual Ward and Emergency Department discharges: clinical outcomes and recommendations following COVID pandemic phase 2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1