分析师乐观主义与买方机构:来自分析师从卖方向买方转变的证据

Biwen Zhang
{"title":"分析师乐观主义与买方机构:来自分析师从卖方向买方转变的证据","authors":"Biwen Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3801213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using career information collected from professional networking sites, I identify sell-side analysts who transition to buy-side institutions, and examine whether these transitioning analysts cater to their future buy-side employers before the transition. I find that, prior to the transition, transitioning analysts produce more favorable research toward stocks that are significant in the portfolios of their future employers. Importantly, I find the favoritism effects are stronger for stocks for which a single analyst's impact is likely to be large, namely, small-cap stocks and stocks with low analyst coverage. I also find such favoritism is present only during the year immediately prior to the transition. Moreover, the favoritism is present only among analysts who immediately transition to the buy-side, and not among those who move to the buy-side after a prolonged transition gap (i.e., where strategic behavior is less likely). These findings are consistent with the career concern hypothesis that sell-side analysts cater to their future buy-side employers to advance their careers.","PeriodicalId":375725,"journal":{"name":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyst Optimism and Buy-Side Institutions: Evidence from Analyst Transition from Sell-Side to Buy-Side\",\"authors\":\"Biwen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3801213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using career information collected from professional networking sites, I identify sell-side analysts who transition to buy-side institutions, and examine whether these transitioning analysts cater to their future buy-side employers before the transition. I find that, prior to the transition, transitioning analysts produce more favorable research toward stocks that are significant in the portfolios of their future employers. Importantly, I find the favoritism effects are stronger for stocks for which a single analyst's impact is likely to be large, namely, small-cap stocks and stocks with low analyst coverage. I also find such favoritism is present only during the year immediately prior to the transition. Moreover, the favoritism is present only among analysts who immediately transition to the buy-side, and not among those who move to the buy-side after a prolonged transition gap (i.e., where strategic behavior is less likely). These findings are consistent with the career concern hypothesis that sell-side analysts cater to their future buy-side employers to advance their careers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPGMI: Capital IQ Data (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

利用从专业社交网站收集的职业信息,我确定了过渡到买方机构的卖方分析师,并检查这些过渡分析师在过渡之前是否迎合了他们未来的买方雇主。我发现,在转型之前,转型分析师对未来雇主投资组合中重要的股票做出了更有利的研究。重要的是,我发现偏爱效应对于单个分析师影响可能较大的股票更强,即小盘股和分析师覆盖率低的股票。我还发现,这种偏袒只在过渡前一年出现。此外,偏爱只存在于立即转换到买方的分析师中,而不存在于那些在长时间转换间隔后移动到买方的分析师中(即,战略行为不太可能发生的地方)。这些发现与卖方分析师迎合其未来买方雇主以促进其职业发展的职业关注假设一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyst Optimism and Buy-Side Institutions: Evidence from Analyst Transition from Sell-Side to Buy-Side
Using career information collected from professional networking sites, I identify sell-side analysts who transition to buy-side institutions, and examine whether these transitioning analysts cater to their future buy-side employers before the transition. I find that, prior to the transition, transitioning analysts produce more favorable research toward stocks that are significant in the portfolios of their future employers. Importantly, I find the favoritism effects are stronger for stocks for which a single analyst's impact is likely to be large, namely, small-cap stocks and stocks with low analyst coverage. I also find such favoritism is present only during the year immediately prior to the transition. Moreover, the favoritism is present only among analysts who immediately transition to the buy-side, and not among those who move to the buy-side after a prolonged transition gap (i.e., where strategic behavior is less likely). These findings are consistent with the career concern hypothesis that sell-side analysts cater to their future buy-side employers to advance their careers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Is a CCP Failure Very Unlikely? Does Shareholder Litigation Risk Cause Public Firms to Delist? Evidence From Securities Class Action Lawsuits How Do Institutional Investors React to Geographically Dispersed Information Shocks? A Test Using the COVID-19 Pandemic Disequilibrium Propagation of Quantity Constraints: Application to the COVID Lockdowns A Green Wave in Media, a Change of Tack in Stock Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1