{"title":"中位跳投和悬挂式跳投","authors":"M. Nebel, Elisabeth Neumann, Sebastian Wild","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611975505.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We extend randomized jumplists introduced by Bronnimann et al. (STACS 2003) to choose jump-pointer targets as median of a small sample for better search costs, and present randomized algorithms with expected $O(\\log n)$ time complexity that maintain the probability distribution of jump pointers upon insertions and deletions. We analyze the expected costs to search, insert and delete a random element, and we show that omitting jump pointers in small sublists hardly affects search costs, but significantly reduces the memory consumption. \nWe use a bijection between jumplists and \"dangling-min BSTs\", a variant of (fringe-balanced) binary search trees for the analysis. Despite their similarities, some standard analysis techniques for search trees fail for dangling-min trees (and hence for jumplists).","PeriodicalId":340112,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Median-of-k Jumplists and Dangling-Min BSTs\",\"authors\":\"M. Nebel, Elisabeth Neumann, Sebastian Wild\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/1.9781611975505.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We extend randomized jumplists introduced by Bronnimann et al. (STACS 2003) to choose jump-pointer targets as median of a small sample for better search costs, and present randomized algorithms with expected $O(\\\\log n)$ time complexity that maintain the probability distribution of jump pointers upon insertions and deletions. We analyze the expected costs to search, insert and delete a random element, and we show that omitting jump pointers in small sublists hardly affects search costs, but significantly reduces the memory consumption. \\nWe use a bijection between jumplists and \\\"dangling-min BSTs\\\", a variant of (fringe-balanced) binary search trees for the analysis. Despite their similarities, some standard analysis techniques for search trees fail for dangling-min trees (and hence for jumplists).\",\"PeriodicalId\":340112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975505.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975505.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We extend randomized jumplists introduced by Bronnimann et al. (STACS 2003) to choose jump-pointer targets as median of a small sample for better search costs, and present randomized algorithms with expected $O(\log n)$ time complexity that maintain the probability distribution of jump pointers upon insertions and deletions. We analyze the expected costs to search, insert and delete a random element, and we show that omitting jump pointers in small sublists hardly affects search costs, but significantly reduces the memory consumption.
We use a bijection between jumplists and "dangling-min BSTs", a variant of (fringe-balanced) binary search trees for the analysis. Despite their similarities, some standard analysis techniques for search trees fail for dangling-min trees (and hence for jumplists).