含2%曲酸制剂与皮秒激光治疗黄褐斑的疗效比较

Naseemullah, Abdul Qayum Khan, F. Khan, Shahzad Rashid Awan, Sarah Riaz Khan
{"title":"含2%曲酸制剂与皮秒激光治疗黄褐斑的疗效比较","authors":"Naseemullah, Abdul Qayum Khan, F. Khan, Shahzad Rashid Awan, Sarah Riaz Khan","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs221610368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Melasma is a frequently observed dermatological condition. The conventional therapies for melasma improvement established to date are mainly categorized into chemical peeling, topical agents and laser therapy. A new technique to reduce discomfort and post-laser discoloration induced by heat effects is the picosecond laser system. Objective: To find out efficacy of 2% kojic acid containing formulation vs picosecond laser for treatment of melasma Methodology: This was comparative randomized controlled study carried out at the department of dermatology Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex Nowshera and alshifa clinic and skin aesthetic, Nowshera for duration of one year from July 2020 to July 2021. Totally, 300 patients were included in the study. Each picosecond laser and kojic acid group comprise of 150 patients. All the information was recorded at the baseline and each following visit. Severity Index (MASI) score was calculated and color photographs were taken of all patients. Results: At baseline, the mean MASI scores for picosecond laser and kojic acid group was 10.5±3.5 and 11.2±4.1 respectively (p=0.31). In both the group significant improvement occur in the MASI scores at weeks 12 and week 20. In picosecond laser group, the most remarkable improvement rate (62%) was noted while in kojic acid containing formulation group the rate of improvement was 41.96%. Conclusion: Our study concludes that picosecond Laser device is an efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic option for melasma as compared to kojic acid containing formulation. Keywords: Efficacy; Kojic acid; Picosecond laser; Melasma","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of 2% Kojic Acid Containing Formulation vs Picosecond Laser for Treatment of Melasma\",\"authors\":\"Naseemullah, Abdul Qayum Khan, F. Khan, Shahzad Rashid Awan, Sarah Riaz Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs221610368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Melasma is a frequently observed dermatological condition. The conventional therapies for melasma improvement established to date are mainly categorized into chemical peeling, topical agents and laser therapy. A new technique to reduce discomfort and post-laser discoloration induced by heat effects is the picosecond laser system. Objective: To find out efficacy of 2% kojic acid containing formulation vs picosecond laser for treatment of melasma Methodology: This was comparative randomized controlled study carried out at the department of dermatology Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex Nowshera and alshifa clinic and skin aesthetic, Nowshera for duration of one year from July 2020 to July 2021. Totally, 300 patients were included in the study. Each picosecond laser and kojic acid group comprise of 150 patients. All the information was recorded at the baseline and each following visit. Severity Index (MASI) score was calculated and color photographs were taken of all patients. Results: At baseline, the mean MASI scores for picosecond laser and kojic acid group was 10.5±3.5 and 11.2±4.1 respectively (p=0.31). In both the group significant improvement occur in the MASI scores at weeks 12 and week 20. In picosecond laser group, the most remarkable improvement rate (62%) was noted while in kojic acid containing formulation group the rate of improvement was 41.96%. Conclusion: Our study concludes that picosecond Laser device is an efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic option for melasma as compared to kojic acid containing formulation. Keywords: Efficacy; Kojic acid; Picosecond laser; Melasma\",\"PeriodicalId\":296492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:黄褐斑是一种常见的皮肤病。迄今为止,改善黄褐斑的常规治疗方法主要分为化学脱皮、局部药物治疗和激光治疗。皮秒激光系统是一种减少热效应引起的不适和激光后变色的新技术。目的:比较含2%曲酸制剂与皮秒激光治疗黄褐斑的疗效。方法学:本研究于2020年7月至2021年7月在诺谢拉卡兹侯赛因艾哈迈德医疗中心皮肤科和诺谢拉alshifa诊所进行为期一年的比较随机对照研究。总共有300名患者参与了这项研究。每皮秒激光加曲酸组150例。在基线和每次随访时记录所有信息。计算患者严重程度指数(MASI)评分,并拍摄彩色照片。结果:皮秒激光组和曲酸组在基线时的平均MASI评分分别为10.5±3.5和11.2±4.1 (p=0.31)。两组患者在第12周和第20周的MASI评分均有显著改善。皮秒激光组改善率为62%,含曲酸制剂组改善率为41.96%。结论:与含曲酸制剂相比,皮秒激光治疗黄褐斑是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。关键词:功效;曲酸;皮秒激光;黄褐斑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of 2% Kojic Acid Containing Formulation vs Picosecond Laser for Treatment of Melasma
Background: Melasma is a frequently observed dermatological condition. The conventional therapies for melasma improvement established to date are mainly categorized into chemical peeling, topical agents and laser therapy. A new technique to reduce discomfort and post-laser discoloration induced by heat effects is the picosecond laser system. Objective: To find out efficacy of 2% kojic acid containing formulation vs picosecond laser for treatment of melasma Methodology: This was comparative randomized controlled study carried out at the department of dermatology Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex Nowshera and alshifa clinic and skin aesthetic, Nowshera for duration of one year from July 2020 to July 2021. Totally, 300 patients were included in the study. Each picosecond laser and kojic acid group comprise of 150 patients. All the information was recorded at the baseline and each following visit. Severity Index (MASI) score was calculated and color photographs were taken of all patients. Results: At baseline, the mean MASI scores for picosecond laser and kojic acid group was 10.5±3.5 and 11.2±4.1 respectively (p=0.31). In both the group significant improvement occur in the MASI scores at weeks 12 and week 20. In picosecond laser group, the most remarkable improvement rate (62%) was noted while in kojic acid containing formulation group the rate of improvement was 41.96%. Conclusion: Our study concludes that picosecond Laser device is an efficient and well-tolerated therapeutic option for melasma as compared to kojic acid containing formulation. Keywords: Efficacy; Kojic acid; Picosecond laser; Melasma
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit of Injuries Sustained in Two–Wheeler Accidents in the Metropolitan City of Karachi, Pakistan Real World Data about the Characteristics of Adult Diabetes Mellitus Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam in Post Operative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Effect of Low Dose (100mg/kg) of Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) on Hematology of Male Albino Mice (Mus musculus) Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Typhidot Test Against Blood Culture in Diagnosis of Enteric Fever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1