{"title":"风力发电机暂态模型验证","authors":"Joseph A. Silvers, K. Shetye, T. Overbye","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the verification of generic dynamic wind turbine models in three different commercial transient stability packages. The paper shows that while the general form of the responses are similar, there are some significant differences. Results are provided for the four different generic wind turbine models using single machine infinite bus equivalents for each model.","PeriodicalId":421943,"journal":{"name":"2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"585 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transient model verification of wind turbines\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A. Silvers, K. Shetye, T. Overbye\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the verification of generic dynamic wind turbine models in three different commercial transient stability packages. The paper shows that while the general form of the responses are similar, there are some significant differences. Results are provided for the four different generic wind turbine models using single machine infinite bus equivalents for each model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"volume\":\"585 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2013.6666896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper addresses the verification of generic dynamic wind turbine models in three different commercial transient stability packages. The paper shows that while the general form of the responses are similar, there are some significant differences. Results are provided for the four different generic wind turbine models using single machine infinite bus equivalents for each model.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
