重新思考版权:不正当得利和不正当竞争的镜头下的财产

Shyamkrishna Balganesh
{"title":"重新思考版权:不正当得利和不正当竞争的镜头下的财产","authors":"Shyamkrishna Balganesh","doi":"10.4324/9781315095400-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"† 1 Most of these infirmities have been attributed to internal tensions within copyright law and policy, including the competing philosophies of access and control, use and exclusion, and rights and exceptions. Professor Stadler's insightful article documents these tensions and proposes a new way of mediating them. 2 She ar- gues that copyright law is best understood as instantiating a restriction on unfair competition and, consequently, that it should do little more than protect creators of original works from \"competitive harm\" in a previously identified (\"relevant\") market. 3 She goes on to propose that this principle be applied exogenously in determining the struc- ture of copyright, and that the copyright grant be reformulated to consist of no more than an exclusive right to distribute works pub- licly. 4","PeriodicalId":438335,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETHINKING COPYRIGHT: PROPERTY THROUGH THE LENSES OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION\",\"authors\":\"Shyamkrishna Balganesh\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315095400-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"† 1 Most of these infirmities have been attributed to internal tensions within copyright law and policy, including the competing philosophies of access and control, use and exclusion, and rights and exceptions. Professor Stadler's insightful article documents these tensions and proposes a new way of mediating them. 2 She ar- gues that copyright law is best understood as instantiating a restriction on unfair competition and, consequently, that it should do little more than protect creators of original works from \\\"competitive harm\\\" in a previously identified (\\\"relevant\\\") market. 3 She goes on to propose that this principle be applied exogenously in determining the struc- ture of copyright, and that the copyright grant be reformulated to consist of no more than an exclusive right to distribute works pub- licly. 4\",\"PeriodicalId\":438335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095400-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095400-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

†1这些缺陷大多归因于版权法和政策内部的紧张关系,包括访问和控制、使用和排除、权利和例外等相互竞争的理念。斯塔德勒教授富有洞察力的文章记录了这些紧张关系,并提出了一种调解它们的新方法。她认为,版权法最好被理解为限制不正当竞争的实例,因此,它应该做的只是保护原创作品的创作者在先前确定的(“相关”)市场中免受“竞争损害”。她接着建议,在确定版权结构时,应将这一原则从外部应用,并重新制定版权授权,使其不超过公开发行作品的专有权。4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RETHINKING COPYRIGHT: PROPERTY THROUGH THE LENSES OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
† 1 Most of these infirmities have been attributed to internal tensions within copyright law and policy, including the competing philosophies of access and control, use and exclusion, and rights and exceptions. Professor Stadler's insightful article documents these tensions and proposes a new way of mediating them. 2 She ar- gues that copyright law is best understood as instantiating a restriction on unfair competition and, consequently, that it should do little more than protect creators of original works from "competitive harm" in a previously identified ("relevant") market. 3 She goes on to propose that this principle be applied exogenously in determining the struc- ture of copyright, and that the copyright grant be reformulated to consist of no more than an exclusive right to distribute works pub- licly. 4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RETHINKING COPYRIGHT: PROPERTY THROUGH THE LENSES OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION Fracking and Federalism Choice The Argument for Same-Sex Marriage Resurrecting the Neglected Liberty of Self‐Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1