基于句法和语义推理的学生程序的细粒度错误定位

Thanh-Dat Nguyen, Thanh Le-Cong, Duc M. Luong, Van-Hai Duong, X. Le, D. Lo, Quyet-Thang Huynh
{"title":"基于句法和语义推理的学生程序的细粒度错误定位","authors":"Thanh-Dat Nguyen, Thanh Le-Cong, Duc M. Luong, Van-Hai Duong, X. Le, D. Lo, Quyet-Thang Huynh","doi":"10.1109/ICSME55016.2022.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault localization has been used to provide feedback for incorrect student programs since locations of faults can be a valuable hint for students about what caused their programs to crash. Unfortunately, existing fault localization techniques for student programs are limited because they usually consider either the program's syntax or semantics alone. This motivates the new design of fault localization techniques that use both semantic and syntactical information of the program.In this paper, we introduce FFL (Fine grained Fault Localization), a novel technique using syntactic and semantic reasoning for localizing bugs in student programs. The novelty in FFL that allows it to capture both syntactic and semantic of a program is three-fold: (1) A fine-grained graph-based representation of a program that is adaptive for statement-level fault localization; (2) an effective and efficient model to leverage the designed representation for fault-localization task and (3) a node-level training objective that allows deep learning model to learn from fine-grained syntactic patterns. We compare FFL's effectiveness with state-of-the-art fault localization techniques for student programs (NBL, Tarantula, Ochiai and DStar) on two real-world datasets: Prutor and Codeflaws. Experimental results show that FFL successfully localizes bug for 84.6% out of 2136 programs on Prutor and 83.1% out of 780 programs on Codeflaws concerning the top-10 suspicious statements. FFL also remarkably outperforms the best baselines by 197%, 104%, 70%, 22% on Codeflaws dataset and 10%, 17%, 15% and 8% on Prutor dataset, in term of top-1, top-3, top-5, top-10, respectively.","PeriodicalId":300084,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FFL: Fine-grained Fault Localization for Student Programs via Syntactic and Semantic Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Thanh-Dat Nguyen, Thanh Le-Cong, Duc M. Luong, Van-Hai Duong, X. Le, D. Lo, Quyet-Thang Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSME55016.2022.00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault localization has been used to provide feedback for incorrect student programs since locations of faults can be a valuable hint for students about what caused their programs to crash. Unfortunately, existing fault localization techniques for student programs are limited because they usually consider either the program's syntax or semantics alone. This motivates the new design of fault localization techniques that use both semantic and syntactical information of the program.In this paper, we introduce FFL (Fine grained Fault Localization), a novel technique using syntactic and semantic reasoning for localizing bugs in student programs. The novelty in FFL that allows it to capture both syntactic and semantic of a program is three-fold: (1) A fine-grained graph-based representation of a program that is adaptive for statement-level fault localization; (2) an effective and efficient model to leverage the designed representation for fault-localization task and (3) a node-level training objective that allows deep learning model to learn from fine-grained syntactic patterns. We compare FFL's effectiveness with state-of-the-art fault localization techniques for student programs (NBL, Tarantula, Ochiai and DStar) on two real-world datasets: Prutor and Codeflaws. Experimental results show that FFL successfully localizes bug for 84.6% out of 2136 programs on Prutor and 83.1% out of 780 programs on Codeflaws concerning the top-10 suspicious statements. FFL also remarkably outperforms the best baselines by 197%, 104%, 70%, 22% on Codeflaws dataset and 10%, 17%, 15% and 8% on Prutor dataset, in term of top-1, top-3, top-5, top-10, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME55016.2022.00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME55016.2022.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

故障定位已经被用于为错误的学生程序提供反馈,因为故障的位置可以为学生提供有价值的提示,让他们了解是什么导致了他们的程序崩溃。不幸的是,现有的学生程序故障定位技术是有限的,因为它们通常只考虑程序的语法或语义。这激发了使用程序的语义和语法信息的故障定位技术的新设计。在本文中,我们介绍了FFL(细粒度故障定位),这是一种使用语法和语义推理来定位学生程序中的错误的新技术。FFL的新颖之处在于,它允许它捕获程序的语法和语义,这有三个方面:(1)程序的细粒度基于图的表示,可适应语句级错误定位;(2)利用所设计的表示进行故障定位任务的有效模型;(3)允许深度学习模型从细粒度语法模式中学习的节点级训练目标。我们将FFL的有效性与最先进的学生项目(NBL, Tarantula, Ochiai和DStar)的故障定位技术在两个现实世界的数据集(Prutor和Codeflaws)上进行了比较。实验结果表明,FFL在Prutor上的2136个程序中成功定位了84.6%的错误,在Codeflaws上的780个程序中成功定位了83.1%的前10个可疑语句。在top-1, top-3, top-5, top-10方面,FFL在Codeflaws数据集上的表现也显著优于最佳基线,分别为197%,104%,70%,22%,在Prutor数据集上分别为10%,17%,15%和8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FFL: Fine-grained Fault Localization for Student Programs via Syntactic and Semantic Reasoning
Fault localization has been used to provide feedback for incorrect student programs since locations of faults can be a valuable hint for students about what caused their programs to crash. Unfortunately, existing fault localization techniques for student programs are limited because they usually consider either the program's syntax or semantics alone. This motivates the new design of fault localization techniques that use both semantic and syntactical information of the program.In this paper, we introduce FFL (Fine grained Fault Localization), a novel technique using syntactic and semantic reasoning for localizing bugs in student programs. The novelty in FFL that allows it to capture both syntactic and semantic of a program is three-fold: (1) A fine-grained graph-based representation of a program that is adaptive for statement-level fault localization; (2) an effective and efficient model to leverage the designed representation for fault-localization task and (3) a node-level training objective that allows deep learning model to learn from fine-grained syntactic patterns. We compare FFL's effectiveness with state-of-the-art fault localization techniques for student programs (NBL, Tarantula, Ochiai and DStar) on two real-world datasets: Prutor and Codeflaws. Experimental results show that FFL successfully localizes bug for 84.6% out of 2136 programs on Prutor and 83.1% out of 780 programs on Codeflaws concerning the top-10 suspicious statements. FFL also remarkably outperforms the best baselines by 197%, 104%, 70%, 22% on Codeflaws dataset and 10%, 17%, 15% and 8% on Prutor dataset, in term of top-1, top-3, top-5, top-10, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RestTestGen: An Extensible Framework for Automated Black-box Testing of RESTful APIs COBREX: A Tool for Extracting Business Rules from COBOL On the Security of Python Virtual Machines: An Empirical Study The Phantom Menace: Unmasking Security Issues in Evolving Software Impact of Defect Instances for Successful Deep Learning-based Automatic Program Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1