再看一下数据

G. Mealy
{"title":"再看一下数据","authors":"G. Mealy","doi":"10.1145/1465611.1465682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We do not, it seems, have a very clear and commonly agreed upon set of notions about data---either what they are, how they should be fed and cared for, or their relation to the design of programming languages and operating systems. This paper sketches a theory of data which may serve to clarify these questions. It is based on a number of old ideas and may, as a result, seem obvious. Be that as it may, some of these old ideas are not common currency in our field, either separately or in combination; it is hoped that rehashing them in a somewhat new form may prove to be at least suggestive.","PeriodicalId":265740,"journal":{"name":"AFIPS '67 (Fall)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"132","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another look at data\",\"authors\":\"G. Mealy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1465611.1465682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We do not, it seems, have a very clear and commonly agreed upon set of notions about data---either what they are, how they should be fed and cared for, or their relation to the design of programming languages and operating systems. This paper sketches a theory of data which may serve to clarify these questions. It is based on a number of old ideas and may, as a result, seem obvious. Be that as it may, some of these old ideas are not common currency in our field, either separately or in combination; it is hoped that rehashing them in a somewhat new form may prove to be at least suggestive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFIPS '67 (Fall)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1967-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"132\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFIPS '67 (Fall)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1465611.1465682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFIPS '67 (Fall)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1465611.1465682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 132

摘要

我们似乎没有一个非常清晰和普遍同意的关于数据的概念——无论是数据是什么,它们应该如何被喂养和照顾,或者它们与编程语言和操作系统设计的关系。本文概述了一种可能有助于澄清这些问题的数据理论。它是建立在许多旧观念的基础上的,因此可能看起来是显而易见的。尽管如此,其中一些古老的思想在我们的领域并不是通用的,无论是单独的还是组合的;人们希望以一种新的形式将它们重新组合起来,至少可以证明是有启发性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Another look at data
We do not, it seems, have a very clear and commonly agreed upon set of notions about data---either what they are, how they should be fed and cared for, or their relation to the design of programming languages and operating systems. This paper sketches a theory of data which may serve to clarify these questions. It is based on a number of old ideas and may, as a result, seem obvious. Be that as it may, some of these old ideas are not common currency in our field, either separately or in combination; it is hoped that rehashing them in a somewhat new form may prove to be at least suggestive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information services and communications: (computer utilities) High-speed thermal printing A practical method for comparing numerical integration techniques Generalized translation of programming languages How do we stand on the big board?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1