法官对迫害案件判决的考虑依据

Putri Alya Zalsabila Hasan
{"title":"法官对迫害案件判决的考虑依据","authors":"Putri Alya Zalsabila Hasan","doi":"10.33756/eslaj.v3i2.15792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the basis of the judge's decision in the case of persecution. The research method used by the author in this study is normative research. The research approach uses analytical descriptive and uses qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the basis for the judge's consideration is three things, namely legal facts, evidence and the judge's belief. These three things will make the judge in terms of giving decisions to the perpetrators of criminal acts or in this case the defendants. These three points have been contained in the indictment of the public prosecutor which will then be concluded and analyzed by the judge to convince his heart in terms of imposing sanctions in accordance with what the defendants did. What should be mitigating for the Defendant in the form of the Defendant promising not to repeat his actions should not be used as consideration for the Judge in deciding a case. This could have been a pretense to gain sympathy from the Judge. So the consideration must be focused on the actions committed by the defendants","PeriodicalId":309785,"journal":{"name":"Estudiante Law Journal","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basis for Judges' Considerations in Decisions on Persecution Cases\",\"authors\":\"Putri Alya Zalsabila Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.33756/eslaj.v3i2.15792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the basis of the judge's decision in the case of persecution. The research method used by the author in this study is normative research. The research approach uses analytical descriptive and uses qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the basis for the judge's consideration is three things, namely legal facts, evidence and the judge's belief. These three things will make the judge in terms of giving decisions to the perpetrators of criminal acts or in this case the defendants. These three points have been contained in the indictment of the public prosecutor which will then be concluded and analyzed by the judge to convince his heart in terms of imposing sanctions in accordance with what the defendants did. What should be mitigating for the Defendant in the form of the Defendant promising not to repeat his actions should not be used as consideration for the Judge in deciding a case. This could have been a pretense to gain sympathy from the Judge. So the consideration must be focused on the actions committed by the defendants\",\"PeriodicalId\":309785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v3i2.15792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudiante Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v3i2.15792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定法官在迫害案件中作出判决的依据。作者在本研究中使用的研究方法是规范研究。研究方法采用分析描述性和定性分析技术。研究结果表明,法官的考虑依据有三个方面,即法律事实、证据和法官的信念。这三件事将使法官对犯罪行为的肇事者作出判决,在这种情况下是被告。这三点已载于公诉人的起诉书中,然后法官将对起诉书进行总结和分析,以说服法官根据被告的行为实施制裁。以被告承诺不再重复其行为的形式对被告来说应该是减刑的,不应作为法官判决案件的考虑因素。这可能是为了获得法官的同情而装腔作势。因此,必须把考虑的重点放在被告的行为上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Basis for Judges' Considerations in Decisions on Persecution Cases
This study aims to determine the basis of the judge's decision in the case of persecution. The research method used by the author in this study is normative research. The research approach uses analytical descriptive and uses qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the basis for the judge's consideration is three things, namely legal facts, evidence and the judge's belief. These three things will make the judge in terms of giving decisions to the perpetrators of criminal acts or in this case the defendants. These three points have been contained in the indictment of the public prosecutor which will then be concluded and analyzed by the judge to convince his heart in terms of imposing sanctions in accordance with what the defendants did. What should be mitigating for the Defendant in the form of the Defendant promising not to repeat his actions should not be used as consideration for the Judge in deciding a case. This could have been a pretense to gain sympathy from the Judge. So the consideration must be focused on the actions committed by the defendants
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Police Obstacles in Revealing the Crime of Disposing of Babies Efforts to Optimize the Office of Religious Affairs of Paleleh District Buol Regency in overcoming the increase in early marriage after the Covid-19 pandemic Legal Consequences of Betel Marriage Settlement During the Covid-19 Pandemic Legal Review on the Transfer of Land Rights (Buying and Selling) to Minors Debatable of Indonesian Citizens' Rights and Obligations Regarding the Covid-19 Vaccination Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1