基于指标的循环经济在欧盟国家的测量

Dorottya Edina Kozma, T. Molnár, Katalin Molnárné Barna
{"title":"基于指标的循环经济在欧盟国家的测量","authors":"Dorottya Edina Kozma, T. Molnár, Katalin Molnárné Barna","doi":"10.17649/tet.36.2.3374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The circular economy is an integral part of sustainable development as a new economic model, which is the opposite of the linear economy that is still in force today. In terms of its basics, we can speak of a sustainable economic system in which economic growth is completely decoupled from the use of resources, in order to reduce the use of natural resources and recycle them. In the study, the authors present the possibility of measuring the circular economy and establish a ranking for the 28 Member States of the European Union based on the created composite indicators measuring the circular economy. The values of the created CCEI index were compared with rankings produced by other researchers in similar and different ways. The goodness of the presented methodology is examined by comparing previous similar research results. \nThe primary objective of the study is to create composite indicators and to analyse their comparability. Further aim is to characterise the leading and the tail-ender countries from which conclusions can be drawn regarding ranking and thus make them comparable. The research objective is achieved by using secondary data based on different Eurostat databases related to a sub-sector of the circular economy for the year 2018. The indicators of the circular economy were grouped according to four areas: production and consumption, waste management secondary raw materials, competitiveness and innovation. These areas are adequately show the topics related to the circular economy. \nIn terms of its structure, the international literature related to the circular economy is reviewed first, followed by the EU strategy and a set of relevant indicators. In the methodological chapter, the methodology of the analysis, the scale coordinate transformation is explained. The research results are compared with the rankings created by other authors and the authors of this study. In this study, the comparison is made from composite indicators using rank correlation, followed by the conclusions. \nThe research findings of the study highlighted the fact that composite indicators can be created in relation to the circular economy, however, creating and comparing them is not an easy task. The ranking on which the comparison is based shows a very high degree of similarity with the selected rankings. Overall and typically, the leading States, such as Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Italy are almost without exception in the top of the rankings in most cases, while the group of tail-enders is led by Malta and Estonia. Based on the results of the macro-level studies, the authors established a kind of competitiveness ranking.","PeriodicalId":133536,"journal":{"name":"Tér és Társadalom","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The indicator-based measurement of the circular economy in the countries of the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Dorottya Edina Kozma, T. Molnár, Katalin Molnárné Barna\",\"doi\":\"10.17649/tet.36.2.3374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The circular economy is an integral part of sustainable development as a new economic model, which is the opposite of the linear economy that is still in force today. In terms of its basics, we can speak of a sustainable economic system in which economic growth is completely decoupled from the use of resources, in order to reduce the use of natural resources and recycle them. In the study, the authors present the possibility of measuring the circular economy and establish a ranking for the 28 Member States of the European Union based on the created composite indicators measuring the circular economy. The values of the created CCEI index were compared with rankings produced by other researchers in similar and different ways. The goodness of the presented methodology is examined by comparing previous similar research results. \\nThe primary objective of the study is to create composite indicators and to analyse their comparability. Further aim is to characterise the leading and the tail-ender countries from which conclusions can be drawn regarding ranking and thus make them comparable. The research objective is achieved by using secondary data based on different Eurostat databases related to a sub-sector of the circular economy for the year 2018. The indicators of the circular economy were grouped according to four areas: production and consumption, waste management secondary raw materials, competitiveness and innovation. These areas are adequately show the topics related to the circular economy. \\nIn terms of its structure, the international literature related to the circular economy is reviewed first, followed by the EU strategy and a set of relevant indicators. In the methodological chapter, the methodology of the analysis, the scale coordinate transformation is explained. The research results are compared with the rankings created by other authors and the authors of this study. In this study, the comparison is made from composite indicators using rank correlation, followed by the conclusions. \\nThe research findings of the study highlighted the fact that composite indicators can be created in relation to the circular economy, however, creating and comparing them is not an easy task. The ranking on which the comparison is based shows a very high degree of similarity with the selected rankings. Overall and typically, the leading States, such as Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Italy are almost without exception in the top of the rankings in most cases, while the group of tail-enders is led by Malta and Estonia. Based on the results of the macro-level studies, the authors established a kind of competitiveness ranking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tér és Társadalom\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tér és Társadalom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17649/tet.36.2.3374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tér és Társadalom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17649/tet.36.2.3374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

循环经济作为一种新的经济模式是可持续发展的重要组成部分,它与目前仍然有效的线性经济相反。就其基础而言,我们可以说是一个可持续的经济系统,在这个系统中,经济增长与资源的使用完全脱钩,以便减少自然资源的使用并使其循环利用。在这项研究中,作者提出了衡量循环经济的可能性,并根据所创建的衡量循环经济的综合指标为欧盟28个成员国建立了排名。创建的CCEI指数的值与其他研究人员以相似或不同的方式得出的排名进行了比较。通过比较以往类似的研究结果,检验了所提出方法的有效性。这项研究的主要目的是创造综合指标并分析它们的可比性。进一步的目标是描述领先和落后国家的特征,从中可以得出关于排名的结论,从而使它们具有可比性。研究目标是通过使用基于2018年与循环经济子部门相关的不同欧盟统计局数据库的辅助数据来实现的。循环经济的指标根据四个方面进行分组:生产和消费、废物管理、二次原材料、竞争力和创新。这些领域都充分展示了与循环经济相关的主题。就其结构而言,首先回顾了与循环经济相关的国际文献,其次是欧盟战略和一套相关指标。在方法论一章中,对分析的方法论、尺度坐标变换进行了说明。将研究结果与其他作者和本研究作者创建的排名进行比较。本研究采用秩相关法对综合指标进行比较,得出结论。该研究的结果强调了一个事实,即可以创建与循环经济相关的综合指标,但创建和比较这些指标并非易事。比较所依据的排名与所选的排名有非常高的相似性。总的来说,在大多数情况下,领先的国家,如德国、联合王国、荷兰和意大利几乎无一例外地名列前茅,而排名靠后的国家则是马耳他和爱沙尼亚。在宏观层面研究结果的基础上,建立了一种竞争力排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The indicator-based measurement of the circular economy in the countries of the European Union
The circular economy is an integral part of sustainable development as a new economic model, which is the opposite of the linear economy that is still in force today. In terms of its basics, we can speak of a sustainable economic system in which economic growth is completely decoupled from the use of resources, in order to reduce the use of natural resources and recycle them. In the study, the authors present the possibility of measuring the circular economy and establish a ranking for the 28 Member States of the European Union based on the created composite indicators measuring the circular economy. The values of the created CCEI index were compared with rankings produced by other researchers in similar and different ways. The goodness of the presented methodology is examined by comparing previous similar research results. The primary objective of the study is to create composite indicators and to analyse their comparability. Further aim is to characterise the leading and the tail-ender countries from which conclusions can be drawn regarding ranking and thus make them comparable. The research objective is achieved by using secondary data based on different Eurostat databases related to a sub-sector of the circular economy for the year 2018. The indicators of the circular economy were grouped according to four areas: production and consumption, waste management secondary raw materials, competitiveness and innovation. These areas are adequately show the topics related to the circular economy. In terms of its structure, the international literature related to the circular economy is reviewed first, followed by the EU strategy and a set of relevant indicators. In the methodological chapter, the methodology of the analysis, the scale coordinate transformation is explained. The research results are compared with the rankings created by other authors and the authors of this study. In this study, the comparison is made from composite indicators using rank correlation, followed by the conclusions. The research findings of the study highlighted the fact that composite indicators can be created in relation to the circular economy, however, creating and comparing them is not an easy task. The ranking on which the comparison is based shows a very high degree of similarity with the selected rankings. Overall and typically, the leading States, such as Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Italy are almost without exception in the top of the rankings in most cases, while the group of tail-enders is led by Malta and Estonia. Based on the results of the macro-level studies, the authors established a kind of competitiveness ranking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A kulturális gazdaság szerepe a Bartók-negyed kialakulásában és fejlődésében Regionális sajátosságok a felelősségteljes kutatás és innováció gyakorlatában : posztszocialista innovációs környezet hatásának vizsgálata hét Közép-Kelet Európai országban Megújuló energiaforrások lakossági megítélése – egy magyarországi felmérés tapasztalatai Innovatív technológiák és a tudásmenedzsment kapcsolata a tulajdonlás kontextusában Az egyetemi közösségi szerepvállalás lehetséges szerepe a társadalmi innovációk létrehozásában hazai kontextusban
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1