一些早期的专有药物的化学分析。

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Isis Pub Date : 1978-06-01 DOI:10.1086/352005
W A Campbell
{"title":"一些早期的专有药物的化学分析。","authors":"W A Campbell","doi":"10.1086/352005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E ARLY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY several attempts were made to disclose the compositions of secret remedies, but the performance rarely matched the promise. The first volume of the Monthly Gazette of Health (1816) was largely devoted to exposing \"the nefarious practices of pretenders, who, for the sake of lucre, sport with the feelings and lives of their fellow creatures.\"' Analysis would enable the public to distinguish those preparations which possessed merit from those which were inert or even dangerous, and in this respect the editor, Richard Reece (who sold family medicine chests and portable laboratories from his Medical Hall in Piccadilly, London), claimed that the Gazette would be superior to all other publications. Yet within a few pages Reece was compelled to hedge. \"It is necessary to observe that in the analysis of a proprietary medicine composed of vegetable products, it is not possible to discover all its constituent parts by any chemical means. Of mineral preparations we can speak with more accuracy.\"2 Metals and common acid radicals could indeed be detected with some certainty, for such exponents of inorganic qualitative analysis as Torbern Bergman, Martin Heinrich Klaproth, and Louis Nicolas Vauquelin had learned their trade in that most difficult field of ore and stone analysis. And with the appearance of the textbooks of Carl Remigius Fresenius and Heinrich Rose, systematic group analysis was securely founded.3 The identification of vegetable products in mixtures was far less satisfactory. The work of the eighteenth-century French chemists on the analysis of plant parts by destructive distillation was directed less toward identification than toward understanding plant constitution. More promising was the water extraction method, known as maceration, infusion, or decoction, according to whether the water was cold, warm, or boiling. Andrew Ure used these methods to separate various vegetable constituents (Table 1), but they were then to be distinguished only by appearance, taste, or solubility in acid, alkali, water, or alcohol.4","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"69 247","pages":"226-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/352005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some early chemical analyses of proprietary medicines.\",\"authors\":\"W A Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/352005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E ARLY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY several attempts were made to disclose the compositions of secret remedies, but the performance rarely matched the promise. The first volume of the Monthly Gazette of Health (1816) was largely devoted to exposing \\\"the nefarious practices of pretenders, who, for the sake of lucre, sport with the feelings and lives of their fellow creatures.\\\"' Analysis would enable the public to distinguish those preparations which possessed merit from those which were inert or even dangerous, and in this respect the editor, Richard Reece (who sold family medicine chests and portable laboratories from his Medical Hall in Piccadilly, London), claimed that the Gazette would be superior to all other publications. Yet within a few pages Reece was compelled to hedge. \\\"It is necessary to observe that in the analysis of a proprietary medicine composed of vegetable products, it is not possible to discover all its constituent parts by any chemical means. Of mineral preparations we can speak with more accuracy.\\\"2 Metals and common acid radicals could indeed be detected with some certainty, for such exponents of inorganic qualitative analysis as Torbern Bergman, Martin Heinrich Klaproth, and Louis Nicolas Vauquelin had learned their trade in that most difficult field of ore and stone analysis. And with the appearance of the textbooks of Carl Remigius Fresenius and Heinrich Rose, systematic group analysis was securely founded.3 The identification of vegetable products in mixtures was far less satisfactory. The work of the eighteenth-century French chemists on the analysis of plant parts by destructive distillation was directed less toward identification than toward understanding plant constitution. More promising was the water extraction method, known as maceration, infusion, or decoction, according to whether the water was cold, warm, or boiling. Andrew Ure used these methods to separate various vegetable constituents (Table 1), but they were then to be distinguished only by appearance, taste, or solubility in acid, alkali, water, or alcohol.4\",\"PeriodicalId\":14667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isis\",\"volume\":\"69 247\",\"pages\":\"226-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/352005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/352005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/352005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some early chemical analyses of proprietary medicines.
E ARLY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY several attempts were made to disclose the compositions of secret remedies, but the performance rarely matched the promise. The first volume of the Monthly Gazette of Health (1816) was largely devoted to exposing "the nefarious practices of pretenders, who, for the sake of lucre, sport with the feelings and lives of their fellow creatures."' Analysis would enable the public to distinguish those preparations which possessed merit from those which were inert or even dangerous, and in this respect the editor, Richard Reece (who sold family medicine chests and portable laboratories from his Medical Hall in Piccadilly, London), claimed that the Gazette would be superior to all other publications. Yet within a few pages Reece was compelled to hedge. "It is necessary to observe that in the analysis of a proprietary medicine composed of vegetable products, it is not possible to discover all its constituent parts by any chemical means. Of mineral preparations we can speak with more accuracy."2 Metals and common acid radicals could indeed be detected with some certainty, for such exponents of inorganic qualitative analysis as Torbern Bergman, Martin Heinrich Klaproth, and Louis Nicolas Vauquelin had learned their trade in that most difficult field of ore and stone analysis. And with the appearance of the textbooks of Carl Remigius Fresenius and Heinrich Rose, systematic group analysis was securely founded.3 The identification of vegetable products in mixtures was far less satisfactory. The work of the eighteenth-century French chemists on the analysis of plant parts by destructive distillation was directed less toward identification than toward understanding plant constitution. More promising was the water extraction method, known as maceration, infusion, or decoction, according to whether the water was cold, warm, or boiling. Andrew Ure used these methods to separate various vegetable constituents (Table 1), but they were then to be distinguished only by appearance, taste, or solubility in acid, alkali, water, or alcohol.4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
期刊最新文献
:A Concise History of Veterinary Medicine :Code: From Information Theory to French Theory :Looking for Longitude: A Cultural History :Flora’s Fieldworkers: Women and Botany in Nineteenth-Century Canada :Technocratic Visions: Engineers, Technology, and Society in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1