种植园核心庄园和小农的契约自由

Ermanto Fahamsyah
{"title":"种植园核心庄园和小农的契约自由","authors":"Ermanto Fahamsyah","doi":"10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.","PeriodicalId":432511,"journal":{"name":"Diponegoro Law Review","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PLANTATION CORE ESTATE AND SMALLHOLDERS\",\"authors\":\"Ermanto Fahamsyah\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diponegoro Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种植园核心庄园和小农(PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat)是一个庄园的合作计划,在一个互利、完整和连续的系统中,大型庄园作为当地小型农场发展的核心。简单地说,PIR是一种合同农业。PIR计划最初是由印度尼西亚政府引入的,目的是鼓励当地农场的发展。此外,合伙制建立在主顾关系的基础上,并通过一种大型庄园为主顾、地方农场为主顾的合同加以规范。然而,PIR系统涉及到合同中的状态。国家的参与很重要,这样可以保护当地农场(客户)的利益,因为这些农场容易受到赞助人(大庄园)的掠夺性剥削,从而平衡合同中各方的议价能力。本文从契约自由的角度对PIR的契约机制提出了质疑。因此,可以得出结论,国家参与PIR表明,合同原则的自由在一定程度上受到操纵,限制了一些赞助人的权力,如控制供应和价格,以保护当地农场不受剥削。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PLANTATION CORE ESTATE AND SMALLHOLDERS
The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EXISTENCE OF PANCASILA IN RESOLVING CONFLICTS OF DIFFERING VIEWS ON RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN INDONESIA LEGAL POLICY ON ECO-PARTNERSHIPS TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT EXISTENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP IN INDONESIA LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CRYPTO INVESTMENT IN ERA 4.0 VIEW FROM CREDO THEORY REGIONAL AUTONOMY IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM AND AUTHORITY IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1