国际法的物质渊源:普遍司法良知的表现

A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade
{"title":"国际法的物质渊源:普遍司法良知的表现","authors":"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade","doi":"10.1163/9789004255074_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human conscience, - more precisely the universal juridical conscience, - appears as the ultimate material source of International Law, providing the intrinsic foundation of jus gentium, in pursuit of the realization of justice. The Martens clause sustains the continued applicability of the principles of International Law, the principles of humanity and the dictates of public conscience, independently of the emergence of new situations and of the development of technology. The universal juridical conscience, unlike the voluntarist conception, has consistently given expression to the fundamental principles of International Law. Such principles came to illuminate the formation and evolution of the international legal order, given the flagrant incapacity of legal positivism to explain the formation of customary norms, of visualizing Law as a means for the realization of justice, and of recognizing that the ultimate foundation of Law is necessarily found outside the positive legal order.Keywords:humanity; international law; international legal order; legal positivism; Martens Clause; material source; universal juridical conscience","PeriodicalId":347946,"journal":{"name":"International Law for Humankind","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Material Source of International Law: Manifestations of the Universal Juridical Conscience\",\"authors\":\"A. Augusto, Cançado Trindade\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004255074_008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human conscience, - more precisely the universal juridical conscience, - appears as the ultimate material source of International Law, providing the intrinsic foundation of jus gentium, in pursuit of the realization of justice. The Martens clause sustains the continued applicability of the principles of International Law, the principles of humanity and the dictates of public conscience, independently of the emergence of new situations and of the development of technology. The universal juridical conscience, unlike the voluntarist conception, has consistently given expression to the fundamental principles of International Law. Such principles came to illuminate the formation and evolution of the international legal order, given the flagrant incapacity of legal positivism to explain the formation of customary norms, of visualizing Law as a means for the realization of justice, and of recognizing that the ultimate foundation of Law is necessarily found outside the positive legal order.Keywords:humanity; international law; international legal order; legal positivism; Martens Clause; material source; universal juridical conscience\",\"PeriodicalId\":347946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Law for Humankind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Law for Humankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004255074_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人类良知,更确切地说,是普遍的司法良知,似乎是国际法的最终物质来源,为追求实现正义的“万民法”提供了内在基础。马滕斯条款坚持继续适用国际法原则、人道原则和公众良心的要求,而不受新局势的出现和技术发展的影响。与唯意志论的概念不同,普遍的司法良知一贯体现了国际法的基本原则。这些原则阐明了国际法律秩序的形成和演变,因为法律实证主义明显无法解释习惯规范的形成,无法将法律视为实现正义的手段,也无法认识到法律的最终基础必然在实证法律秩序之外找到。国际法;国际法律秩序;法律实证主义;Martens条款;物质来源;普遍的司法良知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Material Source of International Law: Manifestations of the Universal Juridical Conscience
Human conscience, - more precisely the universal juridical conscience, - appears as the ultimate material source of International Law, providing the intrinsic foundation of jus gentium, in pursuit of the realization of justice. The Martens clause sustains the continued applicability of the principles of International Law, the principles of humanity and the dictates of public conscience, independently of the emergence of new situations and of the development of technology. The universal juridical conscience, unlike the voluntarist conception, has consistently given expression to the fundamental principles of International Law. Such principles came to illuminate the formation and evolution of the international legal order, given the flagrant incapacity of legal positivism to explain the formation of customary norms, of visualizing Law as a means for the realization of justice, and of recognizing that the ultimate foundation of Law is necessarily found outside the positive legal order.Keywords:humanity; international law; international legal order; legal positivism; Martens Clause; material source; universal juridical conscience
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes: Current State and Perspectives Conceptual Constructions: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes The Material Source of International Law: Manifestations of the Universal Juridical Conscience Basic Considerations of Humanity in Relation to the Law of Treaties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1