Claudia Roșu, Facultatea de Drept a Universităţii de Vest din Timişoara, Alin Speriusi-Vlad
{"title":"Consideraţii critice referitoare la Decizia nr. 12/2020, pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Completul pentru soluţionarea recursului în interesul legii","authors":"Claudia Roșu, Facultatea de Drept a Universităţii de Vest din Timişoara, Alin Speriusi-Vlad","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The authors analyzed the decision of the Supreme Court by an appeal in the interest of the law, regarding the possibility of the party fined according to art. 187 parag. (1) pt. 1 let. a) Code of Civil Procedure, for the introduction, in bad faith, of a civil action, accessory, additional or incidental requests, as well as for the exercise of some appeals, obviously unfounded, by the same decision by which these requests were solved, to submit in the appeal filed to the superior court, criticisms concerning the judicial fine. In the opinion of the authors, the correct interpretation is that these criticisms can be formulated in the appeal filed to the superior court, together with all the other criticisms regarding the solution of the lower court, when the fine was applied by the same decision by which those requests were solved.\"","PeriodicalId":142426,"journal":{"name":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/aubd.2020.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“发件人分析了最高法院出于法律利益提出上诉的决定,即当事人可能根据第十条被罚款的问题。187帕。(1)让……(a)《民事诉讼法》,以恶意提出民事诉讼、附属请求、附加请求或附带请求,以及以解决这些请求的同一决定行使一些显然毫无根据的上诉,在向上级法院提出的上诉中对司法罚款提出批评。提交人认为,正确的解释是,这些批评可以在向上级法院提出的上诉中提出,连同对下级法院解决办法的所有其他批评,因为罚款是由解决这些请求的同一决定适用的。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consideraţii critice referitoare la Decizia nr. 12/2020, pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Completul pentru soluţionarea recursului în interesul legii
"The authors analyzed the decision of the Supreme Court by an appeal in the interest of the law, regarding the possibility of the party fined according to art. 187 parag. (1) pt. 1 let. a) Code of Civil Procedure, for the introduction, in bad faith, of a civil action, accessory, additional or incidental requests, as well as for the exercise of some appeals, obviously unfounded, by the same decision by which these requests were solved, to submit in the appeal filed to the superior court, criticisms concerning the judicial fine. In the opinion of the authors, the correct interpretation is that these criticisms can be formulated in the appeal filed to the superior court, together with all the other criticisms regarding the solution of the lower court, when the fine was applied by the same decision by which those requests were solved."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerespectarea hotărârilor judecătorești pronunțate în materia conflictelor de muncă De la o factură de electricitate la supremația dreptului european: astfel s-a născut doctrina Costa c. Enel Convenția de la Lanzarote privită prin prisma unor prevederi din partea specială a Codului penal al Republicii Moldova și din cea a Codului penal al României Tipuri de investigații sub acoperire Dreptul românesc în Basarabia – înainte și după Marea Unire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1