海德格尔“存在与思维”的教育意义研究

Gunsoo Choi
{"title":"海德格尔“存在与思维”的教育意义研究","authors":"Gunsoo Choi","doi":"10.31366/jer.2023.38.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heidegger clarified the difference in ‘Being and Thinking’ by contrasting the theory of Logos of Herakleitos, Parmenides, and Sophocles in early Greece with the process of change of Logos after Plato. The purpose of this study is to examine Heidegger's metaphysical analysis and to suggest educational implications based on it. \nHeidegger defined the essence of human beings as Dasein, and suggested that it is a leap that Dasein asks the question of Being corresponding to the words of Being, and that teaching and learning of the thinking of Being is necessary for the leap of Dasein. However, human language and speech cannot communicate with Being; Therefore, the thinking of Being and the truth of Being are not directly related with teaching by language or words. \nEven so, according to Heidegger, two opposing forces of calculating thought and the thinking of Being can be harmonized in teaching and learning while cultivating the character of Dasein, and since education is related to metaphysics, the question of Dasein must be asked as the most fundamental question in education. Heidegger's encounter education could complement the knowledge-based teacher curriculum.","PeriodicalId":325322,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of Educational Meaning in M. Heidegger’s 'Being and Thinking'\",\"authors\":\"Gunsoo Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.31366/jer.2023.38.1.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heidegger clarified the difference in ‘Being and Thinking’ by contrasting the theory of Logos of Herakleitos, Parmenides, and Sophocles in early Greece with the process of change of Logos after Plato. The purpose of this study is to examine Heidegger's metaphysical analysis and to suggest educational implications based on it. \\nHeidegger defined the essence of human beings as Dasein, and suggested that it is a leap that Dasein asks the question of Being corresponding to the words of Being, and that teaching and learning of the thinking of Being is necessary for the leap of Dasein. However, human language and speech cannot communicate with Being; Therefore, the thinking of Being and the truth of Being are not directly related with teaching by language or words. \\nEven so, according to Heidegger, two opposing forces of calculating thought and the thinking of Being can be harmonized in teaching and learning while cultivating the character of Dasein, and since education is related to metaphysics, the question of Dasein must be asked as the most fundamental question in education. Heidegger's encounter education could complement the knowledge-based teacher curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31366/jer.2023.38.1.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31366/jer.2023.38.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海德格尔通过对比希腊早期赫拉克莱托、巴门尼德和索福克勒斯的逻各斯理论与柏拉图之后逻各斯的变化过程,澄清了“存在与思维”的区别。本研究的目的是检视海德格尔的形而上学分析,并在此基础上提出教育意义。海德格尔把人的本质规定为此在,并指出此在提出与存在的话语相对应的存在问题是一种飞跃,对于存在的思维的教导和学习对于此在的飞跃是必要的。然而,人类的语言和言语不能与存在沟通;因此,存在的思维和存在的真理与语言或文字的教学没有直接的关系。尽管如此,按照海德格尔的说法,在教学和学习中,计算思维和存在思维这两种对立的力量可以在培养此在性的过程中协调一致,而且既然教育与形而上学有关,那么在教育中就必须把此在问题作为最根本的问题来提出。海德格尔的遭遇教育可以对知识型教师课程形成补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of Educational Meaning in M. Heidegger’s 'Being and Thinking'
Heidegger clarified the difference in ‘Being and Thinking’ by contrasting the theory of Logos of Herakleitos, Parmenides, and Sophocles in early Greece with the process of change of Logos after Plato. The purpose of this study is to examine Heidegger's metaphysical analysis and to suggest educational implications based on it. Heidegger defined the essence of human beings as Dasein, and suggested that it is a leap that Dasein asks the question of Being corresponding to the words of Being, and that teaching and learning of the thinking of Being is necessary for the leap of Dasein. However, human language and speech cannot communicate with Being; Therefore, the thinking of Being and the truth of Being are not directly related with teaching by language or words. Even so, according to Heidegger, two opposing forces of calculating thought and the thinking of Being can be harmonized in teaching and learning while cultivating the character of Dasein, and since education is related to metaphysics, the question of Dasein must be asked as the most fundamental question in education. Heidegger's encounter education could complement the knowledge-based teacher curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Educational Meaning of Self-Development and Mental Awakening in A. N. Whitehead's Symbolism Direction of Korean Parent Education through Analysis of German Parent Education Activities Exploring the Implications of Gadamer's Hermeneutic Understanding on Process-Based Evaluation: Focusing on the Linguisticality of Understanding A study of Educational Meaning in M. Heidegger’s 'Being and Thinking' Characteristics of Longitudinal Study Design Based on School Participation through Cooperation between Local Universities, Office of Education, and Schools: Case Study of Chungnam innovation school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1