胆囊癌可切除性及病理预后的性别差异多中心研究

Yang Tae Park, J. Kang, Jae Seon Kim, M. Jung, S. Kim, Jaehee Cho, S. Woo, K. Lee, E. Kim, Hyo Jung Kim
{"title":"胆囊癌可切除性及病理预后的性别差异多中心研究","authors":"Yang Tae Park, J. Kang, Jae Seon Kim, M. Jung, S. Kim, Jaehee Cho, S. Woo, K. Lee, E. Kim, Hyo Jung Kim","doi":"10.15279/kpba.2022.27.3.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: In gallbladder cancer (GBC), gender differences in incidence and mortality rates have been reported with geographic variation. However, there is little known about sex-related difference in GBC prognosis. This study compares prognostic factors according to gender for GBC.Methods: We searched clinicopathological factors in all stages of 952 GBC patients from seven medical centers in Korea. A total of 927 patients were enrolled and surgery with curative resection was performed in 499 patients.Results: Carbohydrate antigen (≥37 U/mL) was a significant prognostic factor in both females and males (odd ratio [OR], 4.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.13-5.89; p<0.001). Age was a significant factor only in female patients, elderly patients were associated with low resectability and the likelihood of T-stage >2; an independent predictor of poor prognosis via multivariate analysis (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p=0.005, OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; p=0.002). Body mass index (BMI) also showed gender difference, and lower BMI (≤25 kg/m2) was the significant good indicator of multivariate analysis for lymph node metastasis in female patients (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; p=0.005) but, the significant poor indicator of univariate analysis for advanced T-stage in male (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.40-5.54; p=0.003).Conclusions: These results suggest that there is a possibility of gender difference in GBC prognosis. Age and high BMI were poor prognostic factors for curative resection for female GBC patients.","PeriodicalId":342618,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Center Study on Gender Difference in Resectability and Pathologic Prognosis of Gallbladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yang Tae Park, J. Kang, Jae Seon Kim, M. Jung, S. Kim, Jaehee Cho, S. Woo, K. Lee, E. Kim, Hyo Jung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15279/kpba.2022.27.3.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aim: In gallbladder cancer (GBC), gender differences in incidence and mortality rates have been reported with geographic variation. However, there is little known about sex-related difference in GBC prognosis. This study compares prognostic factors according to gender for GBC.Methods: We searched clinicopathological factors in all stages of 952 GBC patients from seven medical centers in Korea. A total of 927 patients were enrolled and surgery with curative resection was performed in 499 patients.Results: Carbohydrate antigen (≥37 U/mL) was a significant prognostic factor in both females and males (odd ratio [OR], 4.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.13-5.89; p<0.001). Age was a significant factor only in female patients, elderly patients were associated with low resectability and the likelihood of T-stage >2; an independent predictor of poor prognosis via multivariate analysis (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p=0.005, OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; p=0.002). Body mass index (BMI) also showed gender difference, and lower BMI (≤25 kg/m2) was the significant good indicator of multivariate analysis for lymph node metastasis in female patients (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; p=0.005) but, the significant poor indicator of univariate analysis for advanced T-stage in male (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.40-5.54; p=0.003).Conclusions: These results suggest that there is a possibility of gender difference in GBC prognosis. Age and high BMI were poor prognostic factors for curative resection for female GBC patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15279/kpba.2022.27.3.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15279/kpba.2022.27.3.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在胆囊癌(GBC)中,已经报道了发病率和死亡率的性别差异和地理差异。然而,对GBC预后的性别差异知之甚少。本研究根据性别比较GBC的预后因素。方法:我们检索了韩国7个医疗中心952例GBC患者各阶段的临床病理因素。共纳入927例患者,其中499例患者行根治性手术切除。结果:碳水化合物抗原(≥37 U/mL)是女性和男性的重要预后因素(奇比[OR], 4.30;95%置信区间[CI], 3.13-5.89;p2;多因素分析显示预后不良的独立预测因子(OR, 1.03;95% ci, 1.01-1.05;p=0.005, OR, 1.05;95% ci, 1.02-1.08;p = 0.002)。体重指数(BMI)也存在性别差异,较低的BMI(≤25 kg/m2)是女性患者淋巴结转移多因素分析的显著良好指标(OR, 0.42;95% ci, 0.23-0.77;p=0.005),但男性晚期t期单变量分析指标显著较差(OR, 2.79;95% ci, 1.40-5.54;p = 0.003)。结论:提示GBC预后可能存在性别差异。年龄和高BMI是女性GBC患者根治性切除的不良预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-Center Study on Gender Difference in Resectability and Pathologic Prognosis of Gallbladder Cancer
Background/Aim: In gallbladder cancer (GBC), gender differences in incidence and mortality rates have been reported with geographic variation. However, there is little known about sex-related difference in GBC prognosis. This study compares prognostic factors according to gender for GBC.Methods: We searched clinicopathological factors in all stages of 952 GBC patients from seven medical centers in Korea. A total of 927 patients were enrolled and surgery with curative resection was performed in 499 patients.Results: Carbohydrate antigen (≥37 U/mL) was a significant prognostic factor in both females and males (odd ratio [OR], 4.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.13-5.89; p<0.001). Age was a significant factor only in female patients, elderly patients were associated with low resectability and the likelihood of T-stage >2; an independent predictor of poor prognosis via multivariate analysis (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; p=0.005, OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; p=0.002). Body mass index (BMI) also showed gender difference, and lower BMI (≤25 kg/m2) was the significant good indicator of multivariate analysis for lymph node metastasis in female patients (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; p=0.005) but, the significant poor indicator of univariate analysis for advanced T-stage in male (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.40-5.54; p=0.003).Conclusions: These results suggest that there is a possibility of gender difference in GBC prognosis. Age and high BMI were poor prognostic factors for curative resection for female GBC patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhagic Acalculous Cholecystitis in Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Patient Mechanistic Loop Resolution Strategy for Short-Type Single-Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Ursodeoxycholic Acid Suppresses Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species in Bile Duct Cancer Cells The First Case Report of Ketamine-Induced Cholangiopathy in Korea Atypical Presentation of Cat-Scratch Disease Mimicking Malignancy: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1