预测学生学习结果的数据挖掘

M. Wati, Wahyu Indrawan, J. A. Widians, N. Puspitasari
{"title":"预测学生学习结果的数据挖掘","authors":"M. Wati, Wahyu Indrawan, J. A. Widians, N. Puspitasari","doi":"10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data mining in educational field has been commonly used to analyzed pattern in academic databases that hard to analyze manually. The main objective of this paper is to compare the performance of data mining algorithms to predicting students' learning result based on student academic data set from inside the academic databases nor outside the academic databases using two data mining algorithms (Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5) based on the accuracy and precision percentage for both algorithms. The result for data set that has been given to build the models shows that Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5 averages accuracy is above 60% just like the precision averages of Naïve Bayes Classifier, the precision averages of Tree C4.5 only gain 58.82% but have a lower average of precision distinction. This study can be extended by using other data mining algorithm like association rule or expanded data set to increase the algorithm performance.","PeriodicalId":351075,"journal":{"name":"2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data mining for predicting students' learning result\",\"authors\":\"M. Wati, Wahyu Indrawan, J. A. Widians, N. Puspitasari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data mining in educational field has been commonly used to analyzed pattern in academic databases that hard to analyze manually. The main objective of this paper is to compare the performance of data mining algorithms to predicting students' learning result based on student academic data set from inside the academic databases nor outside the academic databases using two data mining algorithms (Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5) based on the accuracy and precision percentage for both algorithms. The result for data set that has been given to build the models shows that Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5 averages accuracy is above 60% just like the precision averages of Naïve Bayes Classifier, the precision averages of Tree C4.5 only gain 58.82% but have a lower average of precision distinction. This study can be extended by using other data mining algorithm like association rule or expanded data set to increase the algorithm performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

在教育领域,数据挖掘已被广泛用于分析难以手工分析的学术数据库中的模式。本文的主要目的是比较两种数据挖掘算法(Naïve Bayes Classifier和Tree C4.5)在预测学生学习结果方面的性能,这些数据挖掘算法是基于来自学术数据库内部和学术数据库外部的学生学术数据集,基于两种算法的准确率和精密度百分比。对已经给出的数据集进行建模的结果表明,Naïve贝叶斯分类器和Tree C4.5的平均准确率均在60%以上,与Naïve贝叶斯分类器的精度平均值一样,Tree C4.5的精度平均值仅提高了58.82%,但精度差别的平均值较低。本研究可以通过使用关联规则或扩展数据集等其他数据挖掘算法进行扩展,以提高算法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data mining for predicting students' learning result
Data mining in educational field has been commonly used to analyzed pattern in academic databases that hard to analyze manually. The main objective of this paper is to compare the performance of data mining algorithms to predicting students' learning result based on student academic data set from inside the academic databases nor outside the academic databases using two data mining algorithms (Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5) based on the accuracy and precision percentage for both algorithms. The result for data set that has been given to build the models shows that Naïve Bayes Classifier and Tree C4.5 averages accuracy is above 60% just like the precision averages of Naïve Bayes Classifier, the precision averages of Tree C4.5 only gain 58.82% but have a lower average of precision distinction. This study can be extended by using other data mining algorithm like association rule or expanded data set to increase the algorithm performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of real-time static hand gesture recognition using artificial neural network Application of baby's nutrition status using Macromedia Flash Analysis of radio based train control system using LTE-R and analysis of security requirements: The security of the radio based train control system A study on the effective interaction method to improve the presence in social virtual reality game Expert system to optimize the best goat selection using topsis: Decision support system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1