Editor's introduction

V research is thriving. Not only do we have new international journals but also an explosion of books on visual culture and visual methods. These are signs that visual studies is gaining recognition and esteem within the wider research community. With so much growth over the past twenty years it is unsurprising that image-based studies, in terms of empirical methodology and theory generation, have moved outside of their original bases of sociology and anthropology. This cross-disciplinary shift has broadened the scope and nature of visual research. In addition, there is an increase in critical debate which, unfortunately, is not always informed or balanced. Critical reflection on differing visual modes and practices is fine since it has the capacity to generate enriching ideas and contribute to the robustness of our findings. However, to denigrate the practice of others and elevate one's own visual perspective, for whatever reason, is dangerous since it cultivates a culture of supremacy. Besides, visual research is in its infancy and we need to explore possibilities, investigate creative exchanges, take risks and generally ask of each other's approaches "How can I use this to inform my own work?"