性别问题:共同基金业的性别偏见

Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi, S. Ruenzi
{"title":"性别问题:共同基金业的性别偏见","authors":"Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi, S. Ruenzi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1957317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We document significantly lower inflows into female-managed mutual funds than into male-managed funds. This result is obtained with field data and with data from a laboratory experiment. There are no gender differences in performance. Thus, rational statistical discrimination is unlikely to explain the fund flow effect. We conduct an implicit association test and find that subjects with stronger gender bias according to this test invest significantly less into female-managed funds. Our results suggest that gender bias affects investment decisions and thus offer a new explanation for the low fraction of women in the mutual fund industry.","PeriodicalId":431629,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics eJournal","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"113","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Matters: Gender Bias in the Mutual Fund Industry\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Niessen-Ruenzi, S. Ruenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1957317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We document significantly lower inflows into female-managed mutual funds than into male-managed funds. This result is obtained with field data and with data from a laboratory experiment. There are no gender differences in performance. Thus, rational statistical discrimination is unlikely to explain the fund flow effect. We conduct an implicit association test and find that subjects with stronger gender bias according to this test invest significantly less into female-managed funds. Our results suggest that gender bias affects investment decisions and thus offer a new explanation for the low fraction of women in the mutual fund industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"113\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1957317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1957317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

摘要

我们发现,女性管理的共同基金的资金流入明显低于男性管理的基金。这一结果是根据现场数据和实验室实验数据得出的。在表现上没有性别差异。因此,理性的统计歧视不太可能解释资金流效应。我们进行了内隐关联检验,发现根据该检验,性别偏见较强的被试对女性管理基金的投资显著减少。我们的研究结果表明,性别偏见影响投资决策,从而为共同基金行业中女性比例低提供了新的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Matters: Gender Bias in the Mutual Fund Industry
We document significantly lower inflows into female-managed mutual funds than into male-managed funds. This result is obtained with field data and with data from a laboratory experiment. There are no gender differences in performance. Thus, rational statistical discrimination is unlikely to explain the fund flow effect. We conduct an implicit association test and find that subjects with stronger gender bias according to this test invest significantly less into female-managed funds. Our results suggest that gender bias affects investment decisions and thus offer a new explanation for the low fraction of women in the mutual fund industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The National Flood Insurance Program: Is it Financially Sound? The Performance of Angel-Backed Companies Parameter Estimation from Overlapping Observations Skewness, Basis Risk, and Optimal Futures Demand ACA Exchange Competitiveness in Florida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1