电子邮件语言特征检测虚假陈述的可用性

Chih-Chen Lee, Robert B. Welker
{"title":"电子邮件语言特征检测虚假陈述的可用性","authors":"Chih-Chen Lee, Robert B. Welker","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2021-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study experimentally examines the usability of a participant’s writing style in email inquiries for fraud (misrepresentation) risk assessment by determining whether auditors can detect appropriate language-based risk factors in an email. The results suggest risk factors are present in emails, but auditors fail to use them for risk assessment. For example, shorter emails arouse skepticism when, in fact, this language feature is an insignificant risk factor. More fitting linguistic-based risk factors are lack of specifics and overuse of qualitative descriptions. Guidance may improve auditors’ recognition of appropriate linguistic-based risk factors in email text. Alternatively, risk factors may be too vague to perceive, suggesting a need for techniques to strengthen them in an email inquiry.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of Language Features of Emails for Detecting Misrepresentations\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Chen Lee, Robert B. Welker\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfar-2021-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study experimentally examines the usability of a participant’s writing style in email inquiries for fraud (misrepresentation) risk assessment by determining whether auditors can detect appropriate language-based risk factors in an email. The results suggest risk factors are present in emails, but auditors fail to use them for risk assessment. For example, shorter emails arouse skepticism when, in fact, this language feature is an insignificant risk factor. More fitting linguistic-based risk factors are lack of specifics and overuse of qualitative descriptions. Guidance may improve auditors’ recognition of appropriate linguistic-based risk factors in email text. Alternatively, risk factors may be too vague to perceive, suggesting a need for techniques to strengthen them in an email inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究通过实验检验了参与者的写作风格在电子邮件查询欺诈(虚假陈述)风险评估中的可用性,确定审计师是否可以在电子邮件中发现适当的基于语言的风险因素。结果表明,风险因素存在于电子邮件中,但审计人员未能将其用于风险评估。例如,较短的电子邮件引起怀疑,而实际上,这种语言特性是一个微不足道的风险因素。更合适的基于语言的风险因素是缺乏细节和过度使用定性描述。指南可以提高审计师对电子邮件文本中适当的基于语言的风险因素的认识。或者,风险因素可能太模糊而无法感知,这表明需要在电子邮件查询中使用技术来加强它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability of Language Features of Emails for Detecting Misrepresentations
The study experimentally examines the usability of a participant’s writing style in email inquiries for fraud (misrepresentation) risk assessment by determining whether auditors can detect appropriate language-based risk factors in an email. The results suggest risk factors are present in emails, but auditors fail to use them for risk assessment. For example, shorter emails arouse skepticism when, in fact, this language feature is an insignificant risk factor. More fitting linguistic-based risk factors are lack of specifics and overuse of qualitative descriptions. Guidance may improve auditors’ recognition of appropriate linguistic-based risk factors in email text. Alternatively, risk factors may be too vague to perceive, suggesting a need for techniques to strengthen them in an email inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Dark Triad on Organizational Fraud Manufacturing and Fraud: Evidence from Price Competition and Lean Inventories Remembering the Events of the COVID-19 Pandemic Editorial Policy Taxation and Forensic Accounting: Informing Research and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1