为英国护理途径实践社区发声

J. Gray
{"title":"为英国护理途径实践社区发声","authors":"J. Gray","doi":"10.1258/J.JICP.2005.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical path and process-mapping methodology was used in industry, particularly in the field of engineering from as early as the 1950s. In the 1980s, clinicians in the USA began to develop the pathway tool within managed care; they were re-defining the delivery of care and attempting to identify measurable outcomes. They were focusing on the patient rather than the system, but needed to demonstrate efficient processes in order to fulfill the requirements of the insurance industry. In the early 1990s the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK funded a patient-focused initiative to support organizational change. This resulted in the investigation and development of concepts such as pathways. In 1990, a team from the UK visited the USA to investigate the use of these pathways, or ‘Anticipated Recovery Pathways’ as they were then called. As a result of this visit, 12 pilot sites for pathways were set up in Northwest London in 1991–92. The West Midlands Pathway Development work also got underway. By 1994, the Anticipated Recovery Pathway had evolved into the Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in the UK. ICPs were clinician led and driven, and had patients and locally agreed, best practice at their heart. In response to demand for a coordinated UK ICP users group, the National Pathways User Group (later re-named the National Pathways Association [NPA]) was set up in 1994. A popular and well-supported group, it finally folded in 2002, a casualty of the time required by volunteers to lead the group and administer its running. In 2002, at about the same time that the NPA folded, the National Electronic Library for Health (NeLH) Pathways Database was launched to enable the free sharing of ICPs and ICP projects across the UK. Since 1991, ICPs have been developed and implemented across all health care settings in the UK (acute, community, primary, mental health, private, independent, NHS). ICPs are now used all around the world including Africa, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. However, the UK has formalized the systematic development, implementation and use of care pathways by embedding them in national policy, identifying them as the vehicle for implementation, demonstration/monitoring and evaluation of all health and social care policies, strategies, initiatives and agendas at the frontline.","PeriodicalId":114083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Pathways","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Voice for the UK Care Pathway Community of Practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/J.JICP.2005.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical path and process-mapping methodology was used in industry, particularly in the field of engineering from as early as the 1950s. In the 1980s, clinicians in the USA began to develop the pathway tool within managed care; they were re-defining the delivery of care and attempting to identify measurable outcomes. They were focusing on the patient rather than the system, but needed to demonstrate efficient processes in order to fulfill the requirements of the insurance industry. In the early 1990s the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK funded a patient-focused initiative to support organizational change. This resulted in the investigation and development of concepts such as pathways. In 1990, a team from the UK visited the USA to investigate the use of these pathways, or ‘Anticipated Recovery Pathways’ as they were then called. As a result of this visit, 12 pilot sites for pathways were set up in Northwest London in 1991–92. The West Midlands Pathway Development work also got underway. By 1994, the Anticipated Recovery Pathway had evolved into the Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in the UK. ICPs were clinician led and driven, and had patients and locally agreed, best practice at their heart. In response to demand for a coordinated UK ICP users group, the National Pathways User Group (later re-named the National Pathways Association [NPA]) was set up in 1994. A popular and well-supported group, it finally folded in 2002, a casualty of the time required by volunteers to lead the group and administer its running. In 2002, at about the same time that the NPA folded, the National Electronic Library for Health (NeLH) Pathways Database was launched to enable the free sharing of ICPs and ICP projects across the UK. Since 1991, ICPs have been developed and implemented across all health care settings in the UK (acute, community, primary, mental health, private, independent, NHS). ICPs are now used all around the world including Africa, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. However, the UK has formalized the systematic development, implementation and use of care pathways by embedding them in national policy, identifying them as the vehicle for implementation, demonstration/monitoring and evaluation of all health and social care policies, strategies, initiatives and agendas at the frontline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2005.102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2005.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关键路径和过程映射方法早在20世纪50年代就被用于工业,特别是工程领域。在20世纪80年代,美国的临床医生开始在管理式医疗中开发路径工具;他们正在重新定义医疗服务的提供,并试图确定可衡量的结果。他们关注的是病人而不是系统,但为了满足保险业的要求,他们需要展示有效的流程。20世纪90年代初,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助了一项以患者为中心的倡议,以支持组织变革。这导致了诸如路径等概念的研究和发展。1990年,一个来自英国的团队访问了美国,调查这些路径的使用情况,或者当时被称为“预期恢复路径”。作为这次访问的结果,1991年至1992年在伦敦西北部建立了12个道路试验点。西米德兰兹通道开发工作也在进行中。到1994年,预期恢复路径在英国演变为综合护理路径(ICP)。ICPs由临床医生领导和推动,以患者和当地同意的最佳实践为核心。为了响应对一个协调的英国ICP用户组的需求,国家路径用户组(后来更名为国家路径协会[NPA])于1994年成立。作为一个广受欢迎、得到良好支持的组织,它最终于2002年解散,这是志愿者领导该组织并管理其运作所需时间的牺牲品。2002年,大约在国家方案方案终止的同时,启动了国家卫生电子图书馆途径数据库,以便在英国各地免费共享国际合作方案和国际合作方案项目。自1991年以来,在联合王国的所有卫生保健机构(急症、社区、初级、精神卫生、私人、独立、国民保健制度)制定和实施了综合方案。icp现已在世界各地使用,包括非洲、澳大利亚、比利时、加拿大、丹麦、德国、香港、意大利、荷兰、新西兰、英国和美国。然而,联合王国通过将护理途径纳入国家政策,将其确定为在一线执行、示范/监测和评价所有卫生和社会护理政策、战略、倡议和议程的工具,从而使系统的发展、实施和使用护理途径正式化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Voice for the UK Care Pathway Community of Practice
Critical path and process-mapping methodology was used in industry, particularly in the field of engineering from as early as the 1950s. In the 1980s, clinicians in the USA began to develop the pathway tool within managed care; they were re-defining the delivery of care and attempting to identify measurable outcomes. They were focusing on the patient rather than the system, but needed to demonstrate efficient processes in order to fulfill the requirements of the insurance industry. In the early 1990s the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK funded a patient-focused initiative to support organizational change. This resulted in the investigation and development of concepts such as pathways. In 1990, a team from the UK visited the USA to investigate the use of these pathways, or ‘Anticipated Recovery Pathways’ as they were then called. As a result of this visit, 12 pilot sites for pathways were set up in Northwest London in 1991–92. The West Midlands Pathway Development work also got underway. By 1994, the Anticipated Recovery Pathway had evolved into the Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) in the UK. ICPs were clinician led and driven, and had patients and locally agreed, best practice at their heart. In response to demand for a coordinated UK ICP users group, the National Pathways User Group (later re-named the National Pathways Association [NPA]) was set up in 1994. A popular and well-supported group, it finally folded in 2002, a casualty of the time required by volunteers to lead the group and administer its running. In 2002, at about the same time that the NPA folded, the National Electronic Library for Health (NeLH) Pathways Database was launched to enable the free sharing of ICPs and ICP projects across the UK. Since 1991, ICPs have been developed and implemented across all health care settings in the UK (acute, community, primary, mental health, private, independent, NHS). ICPs are now used all around the world including Africa, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. However, the UK has formalized the systematic development, implementation and use of care pathways by embedding them in national policy, identifying them as the vehicle for implementation, demonstration/monitoring and evaluation of all health and social care policies, strategies, initiatives and agendas at the frontline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a clinical pathway for non-invasive ventilation Effects of care pathways in Dutch child and adolescent mental health care: a preliminary study Lean Thinking and Six Sigma: proven techniques in industry. Can they help health care? Care pathways for prostate cancer The impact of health policy: the extreme case of Abruzzo, Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1