仇恨言论扩散的分类方法:检测Twitter上仇恨言论的传播

Matthew Beatty
{"title":"仇恨言论扩散的分类方法:检测Twitter上仇恨言论的传播","authors":"Matthew Beatty","doi":"10.11159/cist20.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate predictive models to detect the spread of hate speech on Twitter based on diffusion patterns. We experiment with a dataset of 10,000 tweets manually labelled as hate speech or not and show that classification based solely on the sharing graph yields strong F1 scores for our task and high hate speech detection precision. We also highlight the vulnerability of existing textual hate speech detection methods to adversarial attacks and demonstrate that while our methods do not outperform stateof-the-art text models, graph-based models provide robust detection mechanisms and are able to detect instances of hate speech that missed by text classifiers. We find that graph convolutional networks produce the strongest hate speech F1 score of 0.58 and that kernel methods offer strong predictive potential. Finally, we also consider the effects of automated bots in the diffusion of hate speech content and conclude that their sharing behavior plays an insignificant role in our experiments.","PeriodicalId":377357,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification Methods for Hate Speech Diffusion: Detecting the\\nSpread of Hate Speech on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Beatty\",\"doi\":\"10.11159/cist20.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we investigate predictive models to detect the spread of hate speech on Twitter based on diffusion patterns. We experiment with a dataset of 10,000 tweets manually labelled as hate speech or not and show that classification based solely on the sharing graph yields strong F1 scores for our task and high hate speech detection precision. We also highlight the vulnerability of existing textual hate speech detection methods to adversarial attacks and demonstrate that while our methods do not outperform stateof-the-art text models, graph-based models provide robust detection mechanisms and are able to detect instances of hate speech that missed by text classifiers. We find that graph convolutional networks produce the strongest hate speech F1 score of 0.58 and that kernel methods offer strong predictive potential. Finally, we also consider the effects of automated bots in the diffusion of hate speech content and conclude that their sharing behavior plays an insignificant role in our experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11159/cist20.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/cist20.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了基于扩散模式的预测模型来检测Twitter上仇恨言论的传播。我们对10000条推文的数据集进行了实验,手工标记为仇恨言论或非仇恨言论,并表明仅基于共享图的分类为我们的任务产生了很高的F1分数和很高的仇恨言论检测精度。我们还强调了现有文本仇恨言论检测方法对对抗性攻击的脆弱性,并证明尽管我们的方法并不优于最先进的文本模型,但基于图的模型提供了强大的检测机制,并且能够检测到文本分类器遗漏的仇恨言论实例。我们发现图卷积网络产生最强的仇恨言论F1得分为0.58,核方法提供了强大的预测潜力。最后,我们还考虑了自动机器人在仇恨言论内容传播中的影响,并得出结论,它们的分享行为在我们的实验中起着微不足道的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification Methods for Hate Speech Diffusion: Detecting the Spread of Hate Speech on Twitter
In this paper, we investigate predictive models to detect the spread of hate speech on Twitter based on diffusion patterns. We experiment with a dataset of 10,000 tweets manually labelled as hate speech or not and show that classification based solely on the sharing graph yields strong F1 scores for our task and high hate speech detection precision. We also highlight the vulnerability of existing textual hate speech detection methods to adversarial attacks and demonstrate that while our methods do not outperform stateof-the-art text models, graph-based models provide robust detection mechanisms and are able to detect instances of hate speech that missed by text classifiers. We find that graph convolutional networks produce the strongest hate speech F1 score of 0.58 and that kernel methods offer strong predictive potential. Finally, we also consider the effects of automated bots in the diffusion of hate speech content and conclude that their sharing behavior plays an insignificant role in our experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classification Methods for Hate Speech Diffusion: Detecting the Spread of Hate Speech on Twitter A Hands-on Project for Teaching Semantic Web Technologies in an Undergraduate AI Course Sensitivity Analysis of a Portable Microwave Breast Cancer Detection System Optimized 3D Segmentation Algorithm for Shelly Sand Images Mathematical Tools for Processing Broadband Multi-Sensor Signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1