纽约:

J. Chapman
{"title":"纽约:","authors":"J. Chapman","doi":"10.5040/9780571343263.ch-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The price volatilities of the commodities expose commodity trading companies to the risk of big financial losses and force them to combat the risk with a spectrum of hedging strategies. In this paper, we study strategies to reduce shortfall risk in long-term hedging with short-term futures contracts. Our main contribution to the literature is extending Glasserman’s model (2001) to a two-commodity scenario and providing numerical solutions for risk analysis across alternative hedging strategies to minimize either running risk or average risk. In the end, we illustrate a scenario when optimal average risk is superior to optimal fraction strategy if investors wish to receive large returns at the end of the hedging horizon.","PeriodicalId":123361,"journal":{"name":"At the Corner of a Dream","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New York:\",\"authors\":\"J. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9780571343263.ch-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The price volatilities of the commodities expose commodity trading companies to the risk of big financial losses and force them to combat the risk with a spectrum of hedging strategies. In this paper, we study strategies to reduce shortfall risk in long-term hedging with short-term futures contracts. Our main contribution to the literature is extending Glasserman’s model (2001) to a two-commodity scenario and providing numerical solutions for risk analysis across alternative hedging strategies to minimize either running risk or average risk. In the end, we illustrate a scenario when optimal average risk is superior to optimal fraction strategy if investors wish to receive large returns at the end of the hedging horizon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"At the Corner of a Dream\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"At the Corner of a Dream\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9780571343263.ch-002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"At the Corner of a Dream","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9780571343263.ch-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大宗商品价格的波动使大宗商品交易公司面临巨额财务损失的风险,并迫使它们采用一系列对冲策略来应对风险。本文研究了利用短期期货合约进行长期套期保值时降低短缺风险的策略。我们对文献的主要贡献是将Glasserman的模型(2001)扩展到两种商品的场景,并为跨可选对冲策略的风险分析提供数值解决方案,以最小化运行风险或平均风险。最后,我们举例说明了当投资者希望在对冲期结束时获得大回报时,最优平均风险优于最优分数策略的情形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New York:
The price volatilities of the commodities expose commodity trading companies to the risk of big financial losses and force them to combat the risk with a spectrum of hedging strategies. In this paper, we study strategies to reduce shortfall risk in long-term hedging with short-term futures contracts. Our main contribution to the literature is extending Glasserman’s model (2001) to a two-commodity scenario and providing numerical solutions for risk analysis across alternative hedging strategies to minimize either running risk or average risk. In the end, we illustrate a scenario when optimal average risk is superior to optimal fraction strategy if investors wish to receive large returns at the end of the hedging horizon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New York: Tokyo: WORKS CITED CONCLUSION Vancouver:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1