地理指纹识别社交媒体内容

Hatim Gazaz, A. Croitoru, P. Delamater, D. Pfoser
{"title":"地理指纹识别社交媒体内容","authors":"Hatim Gazaz, A. Croitoru, P. Delamater, D. Pfoser","doi":"10.1145/2948649.2948654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the percentage of Twitter users approaching 20% of the US population by 2019, tweets provide a good sample of the public's sentiment and opinion. Consequently such data has been excessively used in commercial and research efforts. While works have analyzed the content of tweets in relation to the underlying social network of a discussion, somewhat less attention has been paid to the spatial distribution of messages and topics. This work tries to assess the locality of discussions using the concepts mentioned in tweets. Based on a global distribution of topics across the 48 contiguous states, we try to ascertain spatial topic dissimilarity by recursively subdividing the space into smaller and smaller partitions and using statistical testing to compare the distributions. Experimenting with a large Twitter dataset for the US, we can observe that locality of a discussion occurs at specific thresholds and that only 14 of the 49 most populous urban areas feature a unique discussion. Overall, this work establishes trends as to when locality in a discussion in social media occurs.","PeriodicalId":336205,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third International ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geo-fingerprinting social media content\",\"authors\":\"Hatim Gazaz, A. Croitoru, P. Delamater, D. Pfoser\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2948649.2948654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the percentage of Twitter users approaching 20% of the US population by 2019, tweets provide a good sample of the public's sentiment and opinion. Consequently such data has been excessively used in commercial and research efforts. While works have analyzed the content of tweets in relation to the underlying social network of a discussion, somewhat less attention has been paid to the spatial distribution of messages and topics. This work tries to assess the locality of discussions using the concepts mentioned in tweets. Based on a global distribution of topics across the 48 contiguous states, we try to ascertain spatial topic dissimilarity by recursively subdividing the space into smaller and smaller partitions and using statistical testing to compare the distributions. Experimenting with a large Twitter dataset for the US, we can observe that locality of a discussion occurs at specific thresholds and that only 14 of the 49 most populous urban areas feature a unique discussion. Overall, this work establishes trends as to when locality in a discussion in social media occurs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third International ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third International ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2948649.2948654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third International ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Managing and Mining Enriched Geo-Spatial Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2948649.2948654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

到2019年,推特用户的比例将接近美国人口的20%,推特提供了一个很好的公众情绪和观点样本。因此,这些数据在商业和研究工作中被过度使用。虽然已有研究分析了推文的内容与讨论的潜在社交网络的关系,但对信息和主题的空间分布的关注较少。这项工作试图使用推文中提到的概念来评估讨论的局部性。基于48个相邻州的全球主题分布,我们试图通过递归地将空间细分为越来越小的分区,并使用统计测试来比较分布来确定空间主题的不相似性。对美国的大型Twitter数据集进行实验,我们可以观察到讨论的局域性发生在特定的阈值上,并且49个人口最多的城市地区中只有14个具有独特的讨论。总的来说,这项工作确定了社交媒体讨论中何时发生局部性的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geo-fingerprinting social media content
With the percentage of Twitter users approaching 20% of the US population by 2019, tweets provide a good sample of the public's sentiment and opinion. Consequently such data has been excessively used in commercial and research efforts. While works have analyzed the content of tweets in relation to the underlying social network of a discussion, somewhat less attention has been paid to the spatial distribution of messages and topics. This work tries to assess the locality of discussions using the concepts mentioned in tweets. Based on a global distribution of topics across the 48 contiguous states, we try to ascertain spatial topic dissimilarity by recursively subdividing the space into smaller and smaller partitions and using statistical testing to compare the distributions. Experimenting with a large Twitter dataset for the US, we can observe that locality of a discussion occurs at specific thresholds and that only 14 of the 49 most populous urban areas feature a unique discussion. Overall, this work establishes trends as to when locality in a discussion in social media occurs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GeoSocialBound: an efficient framework for estimating social POI boundaries using spatio--textual information Geo-fingerprinting social media content Prediction of user app usage behavior from geo-spatial data Taming twisted cubes So far away and yet so close: augmenting toponym disambiguation and similarity with text-based networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1