生物电势分析中深度学习与时间序列的比较研究

Imam Tahyudin, Hidetaka Nambo
{"title":"生物电势分析中深度学习与时间序列的比较研究","authors":"Imam Tahyudin, Hidetaka Nambo","doi":"10.1109/ICITISEE.2018.8720998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of bioelectric potential of plant has been conducted using some methods. Such as, decision tree (J48), multilayer perceptron, ANN, CNN, and etc. However, to find the best accuracy is a seriously challenge because the previous studies did not obtain a satisfied result. Furthermore, Because the data is sequence form, it is interesting if analyzed by deep learning (LSTM) and time series method (ARIMA). Both of methods are have the same characteristics. This approach is a new contribution for this topic. Therefore, the aim of this research is to compare LSTM and ARIMA method for analyzing bioelectric potential data set. For determining the accuracy, we use root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Finally, in this case, the ARIMA model is better than LSTM method and presented a promise result.","PeriodicalId":180051,"journal":{"name":"2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Information System and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Study of Deep Learning and Time Series for Bioelectric Potential Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Imam Tahyudin, Hidetaka Nambo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICITISEE.2018.8720998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of bioelectric potential of plant has been conducted using some methods. Such as, decision tree (J48), multilayer perceptron, ANN, CNN, and etc. However, to find the best accuracy is a seriously challenge because the previous studies did not obtain a satisfied result. Furthermore, Because the data is sequence form, it is interesting if analyzed by deep learning (LSTM) and time series method (ARIMA). Both of methods are have the same characteristics. This approach is a new contribution for this topic. Therefore, the aim of this research is to compare LSTM and ARIMA method for analyzing bioelectric potential data set. For determining the accuracy, we use root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Finally, in this case, the ARIMA model is better than LSTM method and presented a promise result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Information System and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Information System and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITISEE.2018.8720998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Information System and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITISEE.2018.8720998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对植物生物电势进行了多种方法的研究。如决策树(J48)、多层感知器、ANN、CNN等。然而,由于以往的研究并没有得到令人满意的结果,寻找最佳的精度是一个严峻的挑战。此外,由于数据是序列形式,如果使用深度学习(LSTM)和时间序列方法(ARIMA)进行分析,会很有趣。这两种方法都有相同的特点。该方法是对该主题的新贡献。因此,本研究的目的是比较LSTM和ARIMA方法对生物电势数据集的分析。为了确定精度,我们使用均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)。最后,在这种情况下,ARIMA模型优于LSTM方法,并给出了令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison Study of Deep Learning and Time Series for Bioelectric Potential Analysis
The study of bioelectric potential of plant has been conducted using some methods. Such as, decision tree (J48), multilayer perceptron, ANN, CNN, and etc. However, to find the best accuracy is a seriously challenge because the previous studies did not obtain a satisfied result. Furthermore, Because the data is sequence form, it is interesting if analyzed by deep learning (LSTM) and time series method (ARIMA). Both of methods are have the same characteristics. This approach is a new contribution for this topic. Therefore, the aim of this research is to compare LSTM and ARIMA method for analyzing bioelectric potential data set. For determining the accuracy, we use root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Finally, in this case, the ARIMA model is better than LSTM method and presented a promise result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Class Diagram Similarity Measurement: A Different Approach Implementation of QR Code and Imei on Android and Web-Based Student Presence Systems Robustness Analysis of PI Controller to Constant Output Power with Dynamic Load Condition in DC Nanogrid System Indonesian Sign Language Recognition Application For Two-Way Communication Deaf-Mute People Comparison Study of Deep Learning and Time Series for Bioelectric Potential Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1