美国股票收益、Berry-Esseen定理和统计检验

T. Crack, L. Mcalevey, Anindya Sen
{"title":"美国股票收益、Berry-Esseen定理和统计检验","authors":"T. Crack, L. Mcalevey, Anindya Sen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3641266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither existing theory nor prior empirical work can tell us the impact of non-normality on required sample sizes for Student-t tests of the mean in U.S. stock returns. Prior empirical work and bounds from a modified Berry-Esseen theorem do suggest, however, that the answer should vary with market capitalization, driven by third moments. For two-tailed nominally 5%-sized one-sample tests, we find that at least 100 observations are needed for large-capitalization stocks, and at least 200 observations are needed for small-capitalization stocks. Larger sample sizes are required for significance levels below 5%, or if one-tailed tests are used with skewed data.","PeriodicalId":425229,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. Stock Returns, the Berry-Esseen Theorem, and Statistical Testing\",\"authors\":\"T. Crack, L. Mcalevey, Anindya Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3641266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neither existing theory nor prior empirical work can tell us the impact of non-normality on required sample sizes for Student-t tests of the mean in U.S. stock returns. Prior empirical work and bounds from a modified Berry-Esseen theorem do suggest, however, that the answer should vary with market capitalization, driven by third moments. For two-tailed nominally 5%-sized one-sample tests, we find that at least 100 observations are needed for large-capitalization stocks, and at least 200 observations are needed for small-capitalization stocks. Larger sample sizes are required for significance levels below 5%, or if one-tailed tests are used with skewed data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Hypothesis Testing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3641266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是现有的理论还是之前的实证工作都不能告诉我们非正态性对美国股票收益均值的Student-t检验所需样本量的影响。然而,先前的实证研究和修正的Berry-Esseen定理的界限确实表明,答案应该随着市值的变化而变化,由第三时刻驱动。对于名义上5%大小的双尾单样本检验,我们发现大盘股至少需要100个观察值,小盘股至少需要200个观察值。如果显著性水平低于5%,或者单尾检验使用偏斜数据,则需要更大的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
U.S. Stock Returns, the Berry-Esseen Theorem, and Statistical Testing
Neither existing theory nor prior empirical work can tell us the impact of non-normality on required sample sizes for Student-t tests of the mean in U.S. stock returns. Prior empirical work and bounds from a modified Berry-Esseen theorem do suggest, however, that the answer should vary with market capitalization, driven by third moments. For two-tailed nominally 5%-sized one-sample tests, we find that at least 100 observations are needed for large-capitalization stocks, and at least 200 observations are needed for small-capitalization stocks. Larger sample sizes are required for significance levels below 5%, or if one-tailed tests are used with skewed data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Lagrange-Multiplier Test for Large Heterogeneous Panel Data Models "Go Wild for a While!": A New Asymptotically Normal Test for Forecast Evaluation in Nested Models Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability: Existence, Size, and Power Inference for Large-Scale Linear Systems with Known Coefficients The Testing of Efficient Market Hypotheses: A Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1