用Alice教高中生编程概念

Ting-Chung Wang, Wensheng Mei, Shu-Ling Lin, Sheng-Kuang Chiu, J. Lin
{"title":"用Alice教高中生编程概念","authors":"Ting-Chung Wang, Wensheng Mei, Shu-Ling Lin, Sheng-Kuang Chiu, J. Lin","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A quasi-experiment was conducted in this research to investigate the feasibility of using Alice in teaching high school students programming concepts. The subjects were 166 10th-grade students from four intact classes. Alice was taught to two randomly selected classes, and the other two classes were taught C++, both for 8 weeks. The programming constructs students learned included variables, arithmetic expressions, selection structures, repetition structures and built-in functions. An analysis of students' test scores revealed that the Alice group performed significantly better than the C++ group, indicating that Alice seemed to be more effective in facilitating students' comprehension of fundamental programming concepts. Results of questionnaire surveys did not show any significant difference between the two groups in students' motivation toward learning computer programming or their overall learning experience, suggesting that the participating students seemed to have received the two languages equally well.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching programming concepts to high school students with Alice\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Chung Wang, Wensheng Mei, Shu-Ling Lin, Sheng-Kuang Chiu, J. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A quasi-experiment was conducted in this research to investigate the feasibility of using Alice in teaching high school students programming concepts. The subjects were 166 10th-grade students from four intact classes. Alice was taught to two randomly selected classes, and the other two classes were taught C++, both for 8 weeks. The programming constructs students learned included variables, arithmetic expressions, selection structures, repetition structures and built-in functions. An analysis of students' test scores revealed that the Alice group performed significantly better than the C++ group, indicating that Alice seemed to be more effective in facilitating students' comprehension of fundamental programming concepts. Results of questionnaire surveys did not show any significant difference between the two groups in students' motivation toward learning computer programming or their overall learning experience, suggesting that the participating students seemed to have received the two languages equally well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

本研究以准实验的方式,探讨运用Alice教学高中生程式设计概念的可行性。研究对象是来自四个完整班级的166名10年级学生。Alice被随机选择到两个班学习,另外两个班学习c++,时间都是8周。学生学习的编程结构包括变量、算术表达式、选择结构、重复结构和内置函数。对学生测试成绩的分析显示,Alice组的表现明显好于c++组,这表明Alice似乎更有效地促进了学生对基本编程概念的理解。问卷调查的结果没有显示出两组学生在学习计算机编程的动机或整体学习体验上有任何显著差异,这表明参与的学生似乎同样接受了这两种语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teaching programming concepts to high school students with Alice
A quasi-experiment was conducted in this research to investigate the feasibility of using Alice in teaching high school students programming concepts. The subjects were 166 10th-grade students from four intact classes. Alice was taught to two randomly selected classes, and the other two classes were taught C++, both for 8 weeks. The programming constructs students learned included variables, arithmetic expressions, selection structures, repetition structures and built-in functions. An analysis of students' test scores revealed that the Alice group performed significantly better than the C++ group, indicating that Alice seemed to be more effective in facilitating students' comprehension of fundamental programming concepts. Results of questionnaire surveys did not show any significant difference between the two groups in students' motivation toward learning computer programming or their overall learning experience, suggesting that the participating students seemed to have received the two languages equally well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in progress - use of a system for evaluation of learning and formative feedback in fluid mechanics Special session - developing engineering student's philosophical inquiry skills The business of Service Learning Work in progress: iComb Project - a mathematical widget for teaching and learning combinatorics through exercises Work in progress - integrating energy issues and technologies into an electrical or computer engineering curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1