它听起来像它声称的那样:对QuadSeal反措施的详细侧信道安全分析

Darshana Jayasinghe, S. Bhasin, S. Parameswaran, A. Ignjatović
{"title":"它听起来像它声称的那样:对QuadSeal反措施的详细侧信道安全分析","authors":"Darshana Jayasinghe, S. Bhasin, S. Parameswaran, A. Ignjatović","doi":"10.1145/2903150.2911709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VLSI systems often rely on embedded cryptographic cores for security when the confidentiality and authorization is a must. Such cores are theoretically sound but often vulnerable to physical attacks like side-channel analysis (SCA). Several countermeasures have been previously proposed to protect these cryptographic cores. QuadSeal was proposed as an algorithmic balancing technique to thwart power analysis attacks on block cipher algorithms. QuadSeal can be implemented either in hardware or software and it was previously shown on Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) (referred as QuadSeal-AES) to be resistant against power analysis attacks (Correlation Power Analsis and Mutual Information Analysis). In this paper, we analyze QuadSeal against SCA (against power analysis attacks) using leakage detection techniques as well as Correlation Power Analysis with success rates. Our results show that QuadSeal has leakages; however CPA with success rate attack was unable to exploit the leakages efficiently.","PeriodicalId":226569,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does it sound as it claims: a detailed side-channel security analysis of QuadSeal countermeasure\",\"authors\":\"Darshana Jayasinghe, S. Bhasin, S. Parameswaran, A. Ignjatović\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2903150.2911709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"VLSI systems often rely on embedded cryptographic cores for security when the confidentiality and authorization is a must. Such cores are theoretically sound but often vulnerable to physical attacks like side-channel analysis (SCA). Several countermeasures have been previously proposed to protect these cryptographic cores. QuadSeal was proposed as an algorithmic balancing technique to thwart power analysis attacks on block cipher algorithms. QuadSeal can be implemented either in hardware or software and it was previously shown on Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) (referred as QuadSeal-AES) to be resistant against power analysis attacks (Correlation Power Analsis and Mutual Information Analysis). In this paper, we analyze QuadSeal against SCA (against power analysis attacks) using leakage detection techniques as well as Correlation Power Analysis with success rates. Our results show that QuadSeal has leakages; however CPA with success rate attack was unable to exploit the leakages efficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2903150.2911709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2903150.2911709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当必须保密和授权时,VLSI系统通常依赖于嵌入式加密核心来保证安全性。这样的核心在理论上是健全的,但往往容易受到像侧信道分析(SCA)这样的物理攻击。以前已经提出了几种对策来保护这些加密核心。提出了一种算法平衡技术,用于阻止分组密码算法的功率分析攻击。QuadSeal可以在硬件或软件中实现,并且以前在高级加密标准(AES)(称为QuadSeal-AES)中显示可以抵抗功率分析攻击(相关功率分析和互信息分析)。在本文中,我们使用泄漏检测技术以及具有成功率的相关功率分析来分析QuadSeal对抗SCA(对抗功率分析攻击)。我们的结果表明,QuadSeal有泄漏;然而,采用成功率攻击的CPA无法有效地利用泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does it sound as it claims: a detailed side-channel security analysis of QuadSeal countermeasure
VLSI systems often rely on embedded cryptographic cores for security when the confidentiality and authorization is a must. Such cores are theoretically sound but often vulnerable to physical attacks like side-channel analysis (SCA). Several countermeasures have been previously proposed to protect these cryptographic cores. QuadSeal was proposed as an algorithmic balancing technique to thwart power analysis attacks on block cipher algorithms. QuadSeal can be implemented either in hardware or software and it was previously shown on Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) (referred as QuadSeal-AES) to be resistant against power analysis attacks (Correlation Power Analsis and Mutual Information Analysis). In this paper, we analyze QuadSeal against SCA (against power analysis attacks) using leakage detection techniques as well as Correlation Power Analysis with success rates. Our results show that QuadSeal has leakages; however CPA with success rate attack was unable to exploit the leakages efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics and the LHC Using colored petri nets for GPGPU performance modeling Predictive modeling based power estimation for embedded multicore systems Boosting performance of directory-based cache coherence protocols with coherence bypass at subpage granularity and a novel on-chip page table Prototyping real-time tracking systems on mobile devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1