{"title":"中东地区延迟支付违约金:并非板上钉钉","authors":"Joseph Chedrawe","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2017007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liquidated damages in construction contracts represent a fixed-rate mechanism to compensate employers for delays by contractors.Traditionally, common law courts do not interfere with the amount of liquidated damages due. By contrast, the local courts of certain civil law jurisdictions in the Middle East are empowered to adjust those liquidated damages, which raises important questions about how and when those courts will exercise that power and whether international arbitral tribunals will do the same.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidated Damages for Delay in the Middle East: Not Etched in Stone\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Chedrawe\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2017007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Liquidated damages in construction contracts represent a fixed-rate mechanism to compensate employers for delays by contractors.Traditionally, common law courts do not interfere with the amount of liquidated damages due. By contrast, the local courts of certain civil law jurisdictions in the Middle East are empowered to adjust those liquidated damages, which raises important questions about how and when those courts will exercise that power and whether international arbitral tribunals will do the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2017007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquidated Damages for Delay in the Middle East: Not Etched in Stone
Liquidated damages in construction contracts represent a fixed-rate mechanism to compensate employers for delays by contractors.Traditionally, common law courts do not interfere with the amount of liquidated damages due. By contrast, the local courts of certain civil law jurisdictions in the Middle East are empowered to adjust those liquidated damages, which raises important questions about how and when those courts will exercise that power and whether international arbitral tribunals will do the same.