{"title":"板瓣与激光灼烧保守治疗上尿路TCC的比较","authors":"S. Robinson","doi":"10.23880/oajun-16000171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare two conservative treatments for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), laser fulguration and Boari flap. We review the indications for these treatments and the short (32 months) and long term (144 months) outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 20 Boari flap patients and prospectively 13 laser fulguration patients. Results: There was an all-cause mortality of 10% for the Boari group and 23% for the laser group (log rank P 0.19) at 32 months. There was 40% mortality at 144 months for the Boari group. Conclusion: Oncological control can be effectively obtained with these conservative treatments. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient or tumour characteristics. The long term follow up for the Boari group can, with circumspection, be extrapolated to the laser group.","PeriodicalId":405608,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology & Nephrology","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Upper Tract TCC Treated Conservatively with Boari Flap or Laser Fulguration\",\"authors\":\"S. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/oajun-16000171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare two conservative treatments for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), laser fulguration and Boari flap. We review the indications for these treatments and the short (32 months) and long term (144 months) outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 20 Boari flap patients and prospectively 13 laser fulguration patients. Results: There was an all-cause mortality of 10% for the Boari group and 23% for the laser group (log rank P 0.19) at 32 months. There was 40% mortality at 144 months for the Boari group. Conclusion: Oncological control can be effectively obtained with these conservative treatments. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient or tumour characteristics. The long term follow up for the Boari group can, with circumspection, be extrapolated to the laser group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Urology & Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"223 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Urology & Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajun-16000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology & Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajun-16000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们比较了两种治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的保守治疗方法,激光灼烧和Boari皮瓣。我们回顾了这些治疗的适应症以及短期(32个月)和长期(144个月)的结果。方法:回顾性分析20例Boari皮瓣患者,前瞻性分析13例激光灼烧患者。结果:32个月时,Boari组全因死亡率为10%,激光组为23% (log rank P 0.19)。Boari组144个月时死亡率为40%。结论:保守治疗可有效控制肿瘤。两组在患者或肿瘤特征方面没有显著差异。经过仔细观察,波利组的长期随访可以推断为激光组。
A Comparison of Upper Tract TCC Treated Conservatively with Boari Flap or Laser Fulguration
We compare two conservative treatments for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), laser fulguration and Boari flap. We review the indications for these treatments and the short (32 months) and long term (144 months) outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 20 Boari flap patients and prospectively 13 laser fulguration patients. Results: There was an all-cause mortality of 10% for the Boari group and 23% for the laser group (log rank P 0.19) at 32 months. There was 40% mortality at 144 months for the Boari group. Conclusion: Oncological control can be effectively obtained with these conservative treatments. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient or tumour characteristics. The long term follow up for the Boari group can, with circumspection, be extrapolated to the laser group.