{"title":"PFNA与PFN治疗转子间骨折滑动的比较研究","authors":"S. Choo, H. Oh, J. Choi","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFNA and PFN in Intertrochanteric Fractures - Comparison Study of Sliding -\",\"authors\":\"S. Choo, H. Oh, J. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
目的:本研究比较了(a) PFN(股骨近端钉,AO合成物)拉力螺钉与(b) PFNA(股骨近端钉反旋转,AO合成物)螺旋刀片治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的滑动情况。材料和方法:我们纳入了37例在2006年10月至2008年12月间接受髋关节手术的AO/OTA型A1股骨粗隆间骨折患者。PFN组19例,PFNA组18例。与术后立即放射学相比,最后一次随访时还测量了术后放射学的滑动程度。采用Koval法比较两组患者的步行能力。结果:PFN组拉力螺钉的平均滑动量为5.0±2.3 mm, PFNA组螺旋刀片的平均滑动量为2.8±1.3 mm。差异有统计学意义(p=0.04)。行走能力差异无统计学意义(p=0.33)。结论:PFNA组患者种植体滑动较少,但行走能力与PFN组相似。
PFNA and PFN in Intertrochanteric Fractures - Comparison Study of Sliding -
Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.