PFNA与PFN治疗转子间骨折滑动的比较研究

S. Choo, H. Oh, J. Choi
{"title":"PFNA与PFN治疗转子间骨折滑动的比较研究","authors":"S. Choo, H. Oh, J. Choi","doi":"10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.","PeriodicalId":410202,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFNA and PFN in Intertrochanteric Fractures - Comparison Study of Sliding -\",\"authors\":\"S. Choo, H. Oh, J. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Korean Hip Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/JKHS.2010.22.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本研究比较了(a) PFN(股骨近端钉,AO合成物)拉力螺钉与(b) PFNA(股骨近端钉反旋转,AO合成物)螺旋刀片治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的滑动情况。材料和方法:我们纳入了37例在2006年10月至2008年12月间接受髋关节手术的AO/OTA型A1股骨粗隆间骨折患者。PFN组19例,PFNA组18例。与术后立即放射学相比,最后一次随访时还测量了术后放射学的滑动程度。采用Koval法比较两组患者的步行能力。结果:PFN组拉力螺钉的平均滑动量为5.0±2.3 mm, PFNA组螺旋刀片的平均滑动量为2.8±1.3 mm。差异有统计学意义(p=0.04)。行走能力差异无统计学意义(p=0.33)。结论:PFNA组患者种植体滑动较少,但行走能力与PFN组相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PFNA and PFN in Intertrochanteric Fractures - Comparison Study of Sliding -
Purpose: This study compared sliding between (a) lag screws of PFN (Proximal Femoral Nail, AO synthes) and (b) the helical blade of PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation, AO synthes) for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: We include in our study thirty seven cases who were classified as AO/OTA type A1 femoral intertrochanteric fractures and who underwent hip operations between October 2006 and December 2008. There were 19 patients in the PFN group and 18 in the PFNA group. Degrees of sliding were also measured with postoperative radiology on last follow up compared with immediate postoperative radiology. Both groups were also compared with regard too walking ability using the method of Koval. Results: Average sliding was 5.0±2.3 mm for lag screws of the PFN group and 2.8±1.3 mm for the helical blade of the PFNA group. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.04). Ambulatory abilities were not statistically different (p=0.33). Conclusion: Patients in the PFNA group have less sliding of the implant, but their walking abilities are similar to patients in the PFN group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Aim of Medicine Comparative Analysis of Two Cementless Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasties in Patients with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head - Summit® Stem and Bencox® Stem - Repeated Ceramic Head Fracture after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dysplastic Hips Hip Arthroplasty Using Collarless Polished Tapered Stem -Minimum 2 Years Follow-up Results-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1