“敲门敲门!谁在那里?”学术知识库可用性研究

A. Mannocci, Miriam Baglioni, P. Manghi
{"title":"“敲门敲门!谁在那里?”学术知识库可用性研究","authors":"A. Mannocci, Miriam Baglioni, P. Manghi","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6906884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.","PeriodicalId":213862,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Knock knock! Who's there?\\\" A study on scholarly repositories' availability\",\"authors\":\"A. Mannocci, Miriam Baglioni, P. Manghi\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.6906884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6906884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6906884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

。学术知识库是现代开放科学的基石,它们的可用性对于实施其实践至关重要。为此,FAIRsharing、re3data、OpenDOAR和ROAR等学术注册中心通过分配标识符并将其概要元数据持久化,使它们在不同的研究社区、学科和应用程序中存在和可见。唉,像网络上任何其他可用资源一样,学术知识库,无论是为文学、软件还是数据量身定制的,都是非常动态的,可以经常更改、移动、合并或中断。因此,随着时间的推移,它们的引用容易出现链接损坏,它们的可用性通常归结为学术注册中心内权威存储库配置文件中指示的主页url是否响应。在这项研究中,我们收集了四个著名的学术注册中心的内容,并解析了超过13000个唯一的存储库url。通过对如此广泛的存储库集合进行定量分析,本文旨在提供其可用性的全局快照,令人困惑的是,这远远不是授予的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Knock knock! Who's there?" A study on scholarly repositories' availability
. Scholarly repositories are the cornerstone of modern open science, and their availability is vital for enacting its practices. To this end, scholarly registries such as FAIRsharing, re3data, OpenDOAR and ROAR give them presence and visibility across different research commu-nities, disciplines, and applications by assigning an identifier and persist-ing their profiles with summary metadata. Alas, like any other resource available on the Web, scholarly repositories, be they tailored for litera-ture, software or data, are quite dynamic and can be frequently changed, moved, merged or discontinued. Therefore, their references are prone to link rot over time, and their availability often boils down to whether the homepage URLs indicated in authoritative repository profiles within scholarly registries respond or not. For this study, we harvested the content of four prominent scholarly registries and resolved over 13 thousand unique repository URLs. By per-forming a quantitative analysis on such an extensive collection of repositories, this paper aims to provide a global snapshot of their availability, which bewilderingly is far from granted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robots Still Outnumber Humans in Web Archives, But Less Than Before Event Notifications in Value-Adding Networks "Knock knock! Who's there?" A study on scholarly repositories' availability Analysis of the deletions of DOIs: What factors undermine their persistence and to what extent? Whois? Deep Author Name Disambiguation using Bibliographic Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1