乳房x光图像分割算法的性能评价

K. Byrd, J. Zeng, M. Chouikha
{"title":"乳房x光图像分割算法的性能评价","authors":"K. Byrd, J. Zeng, M. Chouikha","doi":"10.1109/AIPR.2005.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comprehensive validation analysis to evaluate the performance of three existing mammogram segmentation algorithms against manual segmentation results produced by two expert radiologists. These studies are especially important for the development of computer-aided cancer detection (CAD) systems, which will significantly help improve early detection of breast cancer. Three typical segmentation methods were implemented and applied to 50 malignant mammography images chosen from the University of South Florida's Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM): (a) region growing combined with maximum likelihood modeling (Kinnard model), (b) an active deformable contour model (snake model), and (c) a standard potential field model (standard model). A comprehensive statistical validation protocol was applied to evaluate the computer and expert outlined segmentation results; both sets of results were examined from the inter- and intra-observer points of view. Experimental results are presented and discussed in this communication","PeriodicalId":130204,"journal":{"name":"34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'05)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance assessment of mammography image segmentation algorithms\",\"authors\":\"K. Byrd, J. Zeng, M. Chouikha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIPR.2005.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a comprehensive validation analysis to evaluate the performance of three existing mammogram segmentation algorithms against manual segmentation results produced by two expert radiologists. These studies are especially important for the development of computer-aided cancer detection (CAD) systems, which will significantly help improve early detection of breast cancer. Three typical segmentation methods were implemented and applied to 50 malignant mammography images chosen from the University of South Florida's Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM): (a) region growing combined with maximum likelihood modeling (Kinnard model), (b) an active deformable contour model (snake model), and (c) a standard potential field model (standard model). A comprehensive statistical validation protocol was applied to evaluate the computer and expert outlined segmentation results; both sets of results were examined from the inter- and intra-observer points of view. Experimental results are presented and discussed in this communication\",\"PeriodicalId\":130204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'05)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2005.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2005.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一个全面的验证分析,以评估现有的三种乳房x光片分割算法的性能,而不是由两位专家放射科医生产生的人工分割结果。这些研究对于计算机辅助癌症检测(CAD)系统的发展尤其重要,这将大大有助于提高乳腺癌的早期检测。采用三种典型的分割方法对来自南佛罗里达大学乳腺造影筛查数字数据库(DDSM)的50张恶性乳腺造影图像进行分割:(a)区域增长结合最大似然模型(Kinnard模型),(b)活动可变形轮廓模型(snake模型),以及(c)标准势场模型(standard model)。采用综合的统计验证方案对计算机和专家轮廓分割结果进行评价;这两组结果都从观察者之间和观察者内部的角度进行了检验。本文给出并讨论了实验结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance assessment of mammography image segmentation algorithms
In this paper, we present a comprehensive validation analysis to evaluate the performance of three existing mammogram segmentation algorithms against manual segmentation results produced by two expert radiologists. These studies are especially important for the development of computer-aided cancer detection (CAD) systems, which will significantly help improve early detection of breast cancer. Three typical segmentation methods were implemented and applied to 50 malignant mammography images chosen from the University of South Florida's Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM): (a) region growing combined with maximum likelihood modeling (Kinnard model), (b) an active deformable contour model (snake model), and (c) a standard potential field model (standard model). A comprehensive statistical validation protocol was applied to evaluate the computer and expert outlined segmentation results; both sets of results were examined from the inter- and intra-observer points of view. Experimental results are presented and discussed in this communication
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive confidence level assignment to segmented human face regions for improved face recognition Segmentation approach and comparison to hyperspectral object detection algorithms A rate distortion method for waveform design in RF image formation Automatic inspection system using machine vision 3D scene modeling using sensor fusion with laser range finder and image sensor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1