图书馆计算机工作站的包容性大学生群体

Brady Cross
{"title":"图书馆计算机工作站的包容性大学生群体","authors":"Brady Cross","doi":"10.33137/ijidi.v4i1.32340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most academic library computer workstations comply with basic accessibility guidelines; however, very few are designed for all users.  The technology exists which enables the differently-able population to access library materials.  This research explores the reasons why academic libraries do or do not incorporate these technologies into their facilities.  The author created a workstation called the “Universal Access Workstation” (UAW), which incorporates assistive and adaptive technology which enables patrons with and without disabilities equitable access to information.  This study addresses the lack of UAW technology in academic libraries when inclusivity is not only broadly accepted, but enthusiastically embraced by institutions of higher learning.  The review of literature addresses Universal Design and the UAW, and how effectively librarians have progressed from the ADA as a minimal standard to Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as a framework.  Empirical evidence was collected in an online survey with questions that address academic librarians’ attitudes and opinions regarding the UAW and Universal Design in academic libraries.  The study reinforces that the social construct of disability is determined, in part, by the facilities which we design.  The article also reveals evidence which indicates there may be a positive trend toward acceptance of Universal Design in library technology, which should lead toward a paradigm shift away from disability as the social construct.  This research concludes that libraries incorporating a UAW into their facility promote equitable access to information for all users and enable everyone to participate in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":232185,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","volume":"27 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Library Computer Workstations for Inclusive College Student Populations\",\"authors\":\"Brady Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/ijidi.v4i1.32340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most academic library computer workstations comply with basic accessibility guidelines; however, very few are designed for all users.  The technology exists which enables the differently-able population to access library materials.  This research explores the reasons why academic libraries do or do not incorporate these technologies into their facilities.  The author created a workstation called the “Universal Access Workstation” (UAW), which incorporates assistive and adaptive technology which enables patrons with and without disabilities equitable access to information.  This study addresses the lack of UAW technology in academic libraries when inclusivity is not only broadly accepted, but enthusiastically embraced by institutions of higher learning.  The review of literature addresses Universal Design and the UAW, and how effectively librarians have progressed from the ADA as a minimal standard to Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as a framework.  Empirical evidence was collected in an online survey with questions that address academic librarians’ attitudes and opinions regarding the UAW and Universal Design in academic libraries.  The study reinforces that the social construct of disability is determined, in part, by the facilities which we design.  The article also reveals evidence which indicates there may be a positive trend toward acceptance of Universal Design in library technology, which should lead toward a paradigm shift away from disability as the social construct.  This research concludes that libraries incorporating a UAW into their facility promote equitable access to information for all users and enable everyone to participate in the learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)\",\"volume\":\"27 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v4i1.32340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v4i1.32340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数大学图书馆的计算机工作站都遵守基本的可访问性准则;然而,很少有是为所有用户设计的。现有的技术使不同能力的人都能获得图书馆资料。本研究探讨了学术图书馆是否将这些技术纳入其设施的原因。作者创建了一个名为“通用访问工作站”(UAW)的工作站,该工作站结合了辅助和自适应技术,使有残疾和没有残疾的用户能够公平地获取信息。当包容性不仅被广泛接受,而且被高等院校热情地接受时,本研究解决了学术图书馆中缺乏UAW技术的问题。文献综述讨论了通用设计和UAW,以及图书馆员如何有效地从ADA作为最低标准发展到通用设计和通用学习设计(UDL)作为框架。经验证据是通过在线调查收集的,调查的问题是关于学术图书馆馆员对UAW和通用设计的态度和意见。这项研究强调,残疾的社会结构部分是由我们设计的设施决定的。文章还揭示了证据,表明在图书馆技术中接受通用设计可能是一种积极的趋势,这将导致一种范式的转变,即不再将残疾视为社会结构。本研究的结论是,图书馆将UAW纳入其设施可促进所有用户公平获取信息,并使每个人都能参与学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Library Computer Workstations for Inclusive College Student Populations
Most academic library computer workstations comply with basic accessibility guidelines; however, very few are designed for all users.  The technology exists which enables the differently-able population to access library materials.  This research explores the reasons why academic libraries do or do not incorporate these technologies into their facilities.  The author created a workstation called the “Universal Access Workstation” (UAW), which incorporates assistive and adaptive technology which enables patrons with and without disabilities equitable access to information.  This study addresses the lack of UAW technology in academic libraries when inclusivity is not only broadly accepted, but enthusiastically embraced by institutions of higher learning.  The review of literature addresses Universal Design and the UAW, and how effectively librarians have progressed from the ADA as a minimal standard to Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as a framework.  Empirical evidence was collected in an online survey with questions that address academic librarians’ attitudes and opinions regarding the UAW and Universal Design in academic libraries.  The study reinforces that the social construct of disability is determined, in part, by the facilities which we design.  The article also reveals evidence which indicates there may be a positive trend toward acceptance of Universal Design in library technology, which should lead toward a paradigm shift away from disability as the social construct.  This research concludes that libraries incorporating a UAW into their facility promote equitable access to information for all users and enable everyone to participate in the learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Monitoring in the Library “She Started Wearing Men’s Clothing and Acting More Masculine" History and Memory of Dissident Sexualities from Latin America Bridging LGBT+ Content Gaps Across Wikipedia Language Editions Silence May Equal Death, But So Does Uncompensated Queer Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1