Android设备中广告软件的机器学习分类算法:比较评价与分析

Joseph Yisa Ndagi, J. Alhassan
{"title":"Android设备中广告软件的机器学习分类算法:比较评价与分析","authors":"Joseph Yisa Ndagi, J. Alhassan","doi":"10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exponential growth experienced in Internet usage has paved the way to exploit users of the Internet, a phishing attack is one of the means that can be used to obtained victim confidential details unwittingly across the Internet. A high false-positive rate and low accuracy have been a setback in phishing detection. In this research 17 different supervised learning techniques such as RandomForest, Systematically Developed Forest (SysFor), Spectral Areas and Ratios Classifier (SPAARC), Reduces Error Pruning Tree (RepTree), RandomTree, Logic Model Tree (LMT), Forest by Penalizing Attributes (ForestPA), JRip, PART, Nearest Neighbor with Generalization (NNge), One Rule (OneR), AdaBoostM1, RotationForest, LogitBoost, RseslibKnn, Library for Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), and BayesNet were employed to achieve the comparative analysis of machine classifier. The performance of the classifier algorithms was rated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-Measure, Root Mean Squared Error, Receiver Operation Characteristics Area, Root Relative Squared Error False Positive Rate and True Positive Rate using WEKA data mining tool. The research revealed that quite several classifiers also exist which if properly explored will yield more accurate results for phishing detection. RandomForest was found to be an excellent classifier that gives the best accuracy of 0.9838 and a false positive rate of 0.017. The comparative analysis result indicates the achievement of low false-positive rate for phishing classification which suggests that anti-phishing application developer can implement the machine learning classification algorithm that was discovered to be the best in this study to enhance the feature of phishing attack detection and classification.","PeriodicalId":166322,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Classification Algorithms for Adware in Android Devices: A Comparative Evaluation and Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Yisa Ndagi, J. Alhassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exponential growth experienced in Internet usage has paved the way to exploit users of the Internet, a phishing attack is one of the means that can be used to obtained victim confidential details unwittingly across the Internet. A high false-positive rate and low accuracy have been a setback in phishing detection. In this research 17 different supervised learning techniques such as RandomForest, Systematically Developed Forest (SysFor), Spectral Areas and Ratios Classifier (SPAARC), Reduces Error Pruning Tree (RepTree), RandomTree, Logic Model Tree (LMT), Forest by Penalizing Attributes (ForestPA), JRip, PART, Nearest Neighbor with Generalization (NNge), One Rule (OneR), AdaBoostM1, RotationForest, LogitBoost, RseslibKnn, Library for Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), and BayesNet were employed to achieve the comparative analysis of machine classifier. The performance of the classifier algorithms was rated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-Measure, Root Mean Squared Error, Receiver Operation Characteristics Area, Root Relative Squared Error False Positive Rate and True Positive Rate using WEKA data mining tool. The research revealed that quite several classifiers also exist which if properly explored will yield more accurate results for phishing detection. RandomForest was found to be an excellent classifier that gives the best accuracy of 0.9838 and a false positive rate of 0.017. The comparative analysis result indicates the achievement of low false-positive rate for phishing classification which suggests that anti-phishing application developer can implement the machine learning classification algorithm that was discovered to be the best in this study to enhance the feature of phishing attack detection and classification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO48375.2019.9043288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

互联网使用的指数级增长为利用互联网用户铺平了道路,网络钓鱼攻击是可以用来在互联网上不知不觉地获取受害者机密信息的手段之一。假阳性率高、准确率低一直是网络钓鱼检测的瓶颈。在这项研究中,17种不同的监督学习技术,如随机森林、系统开发森林(SysFor)、光谱区域和比率分类器(SPAARC)、减少错误修剪树(RepTree)、随机树、逻辑模型树(LMT)、惩罚属性森林(ForestPA)、JRip、PART、最近邻泛化(NNge)、一规则(OneR)、AdaBoostM1、RotationForest、LogitBoost、RseslibKnn、支持向量机库(LibSVM)、和BayesNet来实现机器分类器的对比分析。采用WEKA数据挖掘工具对分类器算法的准确率、精密度、召回率、F-Measure、均方根误差、接收者操作特征面积、均方根误差假阳性率和真阳性率进行评分。研究表明,还有相当多的分类器存在,如果对它们进行适当的探索,将为网络钓鱼检测产生更准确的结果。随机森林被发现是一个优秀的分类器,它给出了0.9838的最佳准确率和0.017的假阳性率。对比分析结果表明,网络钓鱼分类的误报率较低,这表明反网络钓鱼应用开发者可以实现本研究中发现的最好的机器学习分类算法,以增强网络钓鱼攻击检测和分类的特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Classification Algorithms for Adware in Android Devices: A Comparative Evaluation and Analysis
Exponential growth experienced in Internet usage has paved the way to exploit users of the Internet, a phishing attack is one of the means that can be used to obtained victim confidential details unwittingly across the Internet. A high false-positive rate and low accuracy have been a setback in phishing detection. In this research 17 different supervised learning techniques such as RandomForest, Systematically Developed Forest (SysFor), Spectral Areas and Ratios Classifier (SPAARC), Reduces Error Pruning Tree (RepTree), RandomTree, Logic Model Tree (LMT), Forest by Penalizing Attributes (ForestPA), JRip, PART, Nearest Neighbor with Generalization (NNge), One Rule (OneR), AdaBoostM1, RotationForest, LogitBoost, RseslibKnn, Library for Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), and BayesNet were employed to achieve the comparative analysis of machine classifier. The performance of the classifier algorithms was rated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-Measure, Root Mean Squared Error, Receiver Operation Characteristics Area, Root Relative Squared Error False Positive Rate and True Positive Rate using WEKA data mining tool. The research revealed that quite several classifiers also exist which if properly explored will yield more accurate results for phishing detection. RandomForest was found to be an excellent classifier that gives the best accuracy of 0.9838 and a false positive rate of 0.017. The comparative analysis result indicates the achievement of low false-positive rate for phishing classification which suggests that anti-phishing application developer can implement the machine learning classification algorithm that was discovered to be the best in this study to enhance the feature of phishing attack detection and classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Investigation into Peer-to-Peer Network Security Using Wireshark Greenhouse Monitoring and Control System with an Arduino System Transfer Learning Based Histopathologic Image Classification for Burns Recognition Modelling And Realization of a Compact CPW Transmission Lines Using 3D Mmics Technology in ADS Momentum Review of Advances in Machine Learning Based Protein Secondary Structure Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1