各种依赖解析方法的比较

Alymzhan Toleu, Gulmira Tolegen, R. Mussabayev
{"title":"各种依赖解析方法的比较","authors":"Alymzhan Toleu, Gulmira Tolegen, R. Mussabayev","doi":"10.1109/OPCS.2019.8880244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparison results of dependency parsing for two distinct languages: Kazakh and English, by using a various discrete and distributed feature-based approaches We apply graph/transition-based methods to train these models and to report the typed and untyped accuracy. Different comparisons are made for comparing these models by utilizing discrete or dense features. Experimental results show that discrete feature-based approaches (graph-based) perform well than others when the size of data-set is relatively small. For a large data set, the results of those approaches are very competitive with each other, and no significant difference in performance can be observed. In terms of training speed, the results show that discrete feature-based parsers take much less training time than the neural network-based parser, but with comparable performances.","PeriodicalId":288547,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th International Asian School-Seminar Optimization Problems of Complex Systems (OPCS)","volume":"350 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Various Approaches for Dependency Parsing\",\"authors\":\"Alymzhan Toleu, Gulmira Tolegen, R. Mussabayev\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OPCS.2019.8880244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the comparison results of dependency parsing for two distinct languages: Kazakh and English, by using a various discrete and distributed feature-based approaches We apply graph/transition-based methods to train these models and to report the typed and untyped accuracy. Different comparisons are made for comparing these models by utilizing discrete or dense features. Experimental results show that discrete feature-based approaches (graph-based) perform well than others when the size of data-set is relatively small. For a large data set, the results of those approaches are very competitive with each other, and no significant difference in performance can be observed. In terms of training speed, the results show that discrete feature-based parsers take much less training time than the neural network-based parser, but with comparable performances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 15th International Asian School-Seminar Optimization Problems of Complex Systems (OPCS)\",\"volume\":\"350 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 15th International Asian School-Seminar Optimization Problems of Complex Systems (OPCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPCS.2019.8880244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th International Asian School-Seminar Optimization Problems of Complex Systems (OPCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPCS.2019.8880244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过使用各种基于离散和分布式特征的方法,对哈萨克语和英语两种不同语言的依赖关系解析进行了比较。我们应用基于图/转换的方法来训练这些模型,并报告了类型化和非类型化的准确性。通过利用离散特征或密集特征对这些模型进行不同的比较。实验结果表明,当数据集规模相对较小时,基于离散特征的方法(基于图的方法)比其他方法表现更好。对于一个大的数据集,这些方法的结果是相互竞争的,并且在性能上没有明显的差异。在训练速度方面,结果表明基于离散特征的解析器比基于神经网络的解析器花费的训练时间要少得多,但性能相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Various Approaches for Dependency Parsing
This paper presents the comparison results of dependency parsing for two distinct languages: Kazakh and English, by using a various discrete and distributed feature-based approaches We apply graph/transition-based methods to train these models and to report the typed and untyped accuracy. Different comparisons are made for comparing these models by utilizing discrete or dense features. Experimental results show that discrete feature-based approaches (graph-based) perform well than others when the size of data-set is relatively small. For a large data set, the results of those approaches are very competitive with each other, and no significant difference in performance can be observed. In terms of training speed, the results show that discrete feature-based parsers take much less training time than the neural network-based parser, but with comparable performances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Integrated Computational Environment for Optimization of Complex Systems Approaches to Recognize Cavity Inclusions in Elastic Media in Problem of Monitoring Test Sites Formation of Optimal Communication Service Portfolio for Corporate Clients Numerical Solution of the Coefficient Inverse Problem for a Production-Destruction Model with Various Adjoint Ensemble Designs On Models of Economic Development, Taking Into Account Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1