可持续建设的聚合物和传统混凝土的比较生命周期评估:在埃及阿西尤特大学医院新诊所的案例研究。

A. M. Ali
{"title":"可持续建设的聚合物和传统混凝土的比较生命周期评估:在埃及阿西尤特大学医院新诊所的案例研究。","authors":"A. M. Ali","doi":"10.21608/jesaun.2023.214792.1235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The building material industry has the largest share in global environmental emissions. This research investigates the environmental impact of polymeric concrete compared to conventional concrete in the construction of a new clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted from raw material extraction to production stage (cradle to gate stage) using SimaPro V9.5 software. All environmental impact has been investigated using the IMPACT2002+ method using the midpoint and endpoint results. The LCA results showed that polymeric concrete had a lower environmental impact than conventional concrete regarding global warming, acidification, and eutrophication potential. In terms of the single score outcomes, climate change had a significant impact on both ordinary and polymer concrete, with the former scoring 0.90 mPt and the latter recording a much lower 0.14 mPt , indicating a 75% reduction. Furthermore, when considering the weighting results (midpoint result), it was found that specific environmental impacts, such as global warming, respiratory inorganic, and non-renewable energy impacts, had a more significant effect overall. Specifically, the global warming potential was found to be 8.95 Kg CO 2 eq. and 1.38 Kg CO 2 eq. for polymer and ordinary concrete, respectively. Lastly, the endpoint result showed that human health was impacted the most, with a total reduction of 84.24%. The DALY recorded for ordinary concrete was 3.69E-06, whereas, for polymer concrete, it was 5.8E-07. The findings of this study suggest that polymeric concrete can be a more sustainable alternative to conventional concrete for specific applications. One of the main difficulties faced in applying polymer concrete in the construction industry is its higher cost compared to conventional concrete. The production process of polymer concrete requires specialized equipment and expertise, which can increase the overall cost of the material. Additionally, the use of polymer concrete may require changes in construction techniques and design specifications, which can be challenging for contractors and engineers who are used","PeriodicalId":166670,"journal":{"name":"JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"397 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Polymeric and Conventional Concrete for Sustainable Construction: A Case Study of a New Clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jesaun.2023.214792.1235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The building material industry has the largest share in global environmental emissions. This research investigates the environmental impact of polymeric concrete compared to conventional concrete in the construction of a new clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted from raw material extraction to production stage (cradle to gate stage) using SimaPro V9.5 software. All environmental impact has been investigated using the IMPACT2002+ method using the midpoint and endpoint results. The LCA results showed that polymeric concrete had a lower environmental impact than conventional concrete regarding global warming, acidification, and eutrophication potential. In terms of the single score outcomes, climate change had a significant impact on both ordinary and polymer concrete, with the former scoring 0.90 mPt and the latter recording a much lower 0.14 mPt , indicating a 75% reduction. Furthermore, when considering the weighting results (midpoint result), it was found that specific environmental impacts, such as global warming, respiratory inorganic, and non-renewable energy impacts, had a more significant effect overall. Specifically, the global warming potential was found to be 8.95 Kg CO 2 eq. and 1.38 Kg CO 2 eq. for polymer and ordinary concrete, respectively. Lastly, the endpoint result showed that human health was impacted the most, with a total reduction of 84.24%. The DALY recorded for ordinary concrete was 3.69E-06, whereas, for polymer concrete, it was 5.8E-07. The findings of this study suggest that polymeric concrete can be a more sustainable alternative to conventional concrete for specific applications. One of the main difficulties faced in applying polymer concrete in the construction industry is its higher cost compared to conventional concrete. The production process of polymer concrete requires specialized equipment and expertise, which can increase the overall cost of the material. Additionally, the use of polymer concrete may require changes in construction techniques and design specifications, which can be challenging for contractors and engineers who are used\",\"PeriodicalId\":166670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\"397 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2023.214792.1235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2023.214792.1235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑材料行业在全球环境排放中所占的份额最大。本研究调查了聚合物混凝土与传统混凝土在埃及Assiut大学医院新诊所建设中的环境影响。采用SimaPro V9.5软件进行从原料提取到生产阶段(从摇篮到闸门阶段)的生命周期评价(LCA)。所有的环境影响都采用了使用中点和终点结果的IMPACT2002+方法进行调查。LCA结果表明,在全球变暖、酸化和富营养化潜力方面,聚合物混凝土对环境的影响比传统混凝土要小。就单一得分结果而言,气候变化对普通混凝土和聚合物混凝土都有显著影响,前者的得分为0.90 mPt,后者的得分低得多,为0.14 mPt,表明减少了75%。此外,在考虑权重结果(中点结果)时,发现全球变暖、呼吸性无机和不可再生能源影响等特定环境影响的整体影响更为显著。具体来说,聚合物混凝土和普通混凝土的全球变暖潜能值分别为8.95千克二氧化碳当量和1.38千克二氧化碳当量。最后,终点结果显示,人类健康受到的影响最大,总降幅为84.24%。普通混凝土的DALY为3.69E-06,聚合物混凝土的DALY为5.8E-07。这项研究的结果表明,聚合物混凝土可以是一个更可持续的替代传统混凝土的特定应用。高分子混凝土在建筑工业中应用面临的主要困难之一是与传统混凝土相比,其成本较高。聚合物混凝土的生产过程需要专门的设备和专业知识,这可能会增加材料的整体成本。此外,聚合物混凝土的使用可能需要改变施工技术和设计规范,这对使用聚合物混凝土的承包商和工程师来说可能是一个挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Polymeric and Conventional Concrete for Sustainable Construction: A Case Study of a New Clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt.
The building material industry has the largest share in global environmental emissions. This research investigates the environmental impact of polymeric concrete compared to conventional concrete in the construction of a new clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted from raw material extraction to production stage (cradle to gate stage) using SimaPro V9.5 software. All environmental impact has been investigated using the IMPACT2002+ method using the midpoint and endpoint results. The LCA results showed that polymeric concrete had a lower environmental impact than conventional concrete regarding global warming, acidification, and eutrophication potential. In terms of the single score outcomes, climate change had a significant impact on both ordinary and polymer concrete, with the former scoring 0.90 mPt and the latter recording a much lower 0.14 mPt , indicating a 75% reduction. Furthermore, when considering the weighting results (midpoint result), it was found that specific environmental impacts, such as global warming, respiratory inorganic, and non-renewable energy impacts, had a more significant effect overall. Specifically, the global warming potential was found to be 8.95 Kg CO 2 eq. and 1.38 Kg CO 2 eq. for polymer and ordinary concrete, respectively. Lastly, the endpoint result showed that human health was impacted the most, with a total reduction of 84.24%. The DALY recorded for ordinary concrete was 3.69E-06, whereas, for polymer concrete, it was 5.8E-07. The findings of this study suggest that polymeric concrete can be a more sustainable alternative to conventional concrete for specific applications. One of the main difficulties faced in applying polymer concrete in the construction industry is its higher cost compared to conventional concrete. The production process of polymer concrete requires specialized equipment and expertise, which can increase the overall cost of the material. Additionally, the use of polymer concrete may require changes in construction techniques and design specifications, which can be challenging for contractors and engineers who are used
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Design Standards and Requirements for Universal Access Elements in Educational Buildings: A Case Study of King Saud University تطبيق المعايير والاشتراطات التصميمية لعناصر الوصول الشامل في المباني التعليمية: جامعة الملك سعود حالة دراسية Design of Integrated All Optical JK Flip Flop using 2D Photonic Crystals Factors Affecting the Socio-cultural Sustainability of Saudi Housing: A Case Study of Riyadh العوامل المؤثرة في الاستدامة الاجتماعية الثقافية للإسكان السعودي: مدينة الرياض حالة دراسية Factors Affecting the Socio-cultural Sustainability of Saudi Housing: A Case Study of Riyadh العوامل المؤثرة في الاستدامة الاجتماعية الثقافية للإسكان السعودي: مدينة الرياض حالة دراسية Recycling Agricultural Wastes in Concrete: Maize and Sorghum as examples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1