一年级和初级化学学生对化学研究的看法

Marissa Rollnick, G. Green, Margie White, Frackson Mumba, J. Bennett
{"title":"一年级和初级化学学生对化学研究的看法","authors":"Marissa Rollnick, G. Green, Margie White, Frackson Mumba, J. Bennett","doi":"10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study makes use of a previously validated instrument to compare the views about the study of chemistry expressed by two different groups of chemistry students in their first year of study at university. One group was enrolled in an access course, while the other was a group of direct entry students. Six strands were explored in the questionnaire — attitudes to study, practical work, tutorials, lectures, language and, for the first group only, being on an access course. Quantitative findings showed similarities and difference between the groups, most notably that the access students were more positive in their attitudes towards tutorials, while direct entry students, being predominantly English first language speakers, were more positive about language. On the qualitative side, differences and similarities also emerged in the profiles constructed, which were found to be useful for planning future interventions.","PeriodicalId":421869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of First Year and Access Chemistry Students' Views of the Study of Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Rollnick, G. Green, Margie White, Frackson Mumba, J. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study makes use of a previously validated instrument to compare the views about the study of chemistry expressed by two different groups of chemistry students in their first year of study at university. One group was enrolled in an access course, while the other was a group of direct entry students. Six strands were explored in the questionnaire — attitudes to study, practical work, tutorials, lectures, language and, for the first group only, being on an access course. Quantitative findings showed similarities and difference between the groups, most notably that the access students were more positive in their attitudes towards tutorials, while direct entry students, being predominantly English first language speakers, were more positive about language. On the qualitative side, differences and similarities also emerged in the profiles constructed, which were found to be useful for planning future interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2001.10756126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要:本研究利用一种经过验证的仪器,比较了两组不同的大学一年级化学学生对化学学习的看法。其中一组参加了入门课程,而另一组则是直接入学的学生。调查问卷探讨了六个方面——对学习的态度、实际工作、辅导、讲座、语言,以及仅对第一组人来说正在上入门课程。定量调查结果显示了各组之间的相似之处和差异,最值得注意的是,进入的学生对辅导课的态度更为积极,而直接进入的学生,主要是母语为英语的人,对语言的态度更为积极。在质量方面,所构建的概况也出现了差异和相似之处,这被发现对规划未来的干预措施很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profiles of First Year and Access Chemistry Students' Views of the Study of Chemistry
Abstract This study makes use of a previously validated instrument to compare the views about the study of chemistry expressed by two different groups of chemistry students in their first year of study at university. One group was enrolled in an access course, while the other was a group of direct entry students. Six strands were explored in the questionnaire — attitudes to study, practical work, tutorials, lectures, language and, for the first group only, being on an access course. Quantitative findings showed similarities and difference between the groups, most notably that the access students were more positive in their attitudes towards tutorials, while direct entry students, being predominantly English first language speakers, were more positive about language. On the qualitative side, differences and similarities also emerged in the profiles constructed, which were found to be useful for planning future interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical Quantities and their Changes: Difficulties and Perceptions by Chemistry Students Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance Attributions Among First Year Students at National University of Lesotho: Implications for Access to and Performance in Mathematics Profiles of First Year and Access Chemistry Students' Views of the Study of Chemistry An Insight into the Processes of the Localisation of Science Curriculum in Botswana Zimbabwean Students' Conceptions of Selected Ecological Concepts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1