企业违约风险的机器学习:多期预测、脆弱性相关性、贷款组合和尾部概率

Fabio Sigrist, N. Leuenberger
{"title":"企业违约风险的机器学习:多期预测、脆弱性相关性、贷款组合和尾部概率","authors":"Fabio Sigrist, N. Leuenberger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3938972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use machine learning methods for modeling multi-period corporate default probabilities and obtain higher prediction accuracy compared to linear models with the differences being larger for longer prediction horizons. Overall, tree-boosting has the highest prediction accuracy. In addition, we introduce a novel hybrid econometric-machine learning model combining tree-boosting with a latent frailty model. This ``LaGaBoost frailty model\" results in more accurate predictions of upper tails of portfolio losses compared to both a linear frailty model and machine learning methods ignoring frailty correlation. We also investigate the reasons and find various explanations for the observed differences in prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning for Corporate Default Risk: Multi-Period Prediction, Frailty Correlation, Loan Portfolios, and Tail Probabilities\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Sigrist, N. Leuenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3938972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use machine learning methods for modeling multi-period corporate default probabilities and obtain higher prediction accuracy compared to linear models with the differences being larger for longer prediction horizons. Overall, tree-boosting has the highest prediction accuracy. In addition, we introduce a novel hybrid econometric-machine learning model combining tree-boosting with a latent frailty model. This ``LaGaBoost frailty model\\\" results in more accurate predictions of upper tails of portfolio losses compared to both a linear frailty model and machine learning methods ignoring frailty correlation. We also investigate the reasons and find various explanations for the observed differences in prediction accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们使用机器学习方法对多周期企业违约概率进行建模,与线性模型相比,我们获得了更高的预测精度,并且在更长的预测范围内差异更大。总体而言,树助推具有最高的预测精度。此外,我们还引入了一种新的混合计量经济学-机器学习模型,该模型结合了树促进和潜在脆弱性模型。与线性脆弱性模型和忽略脆弱性相关性的机器学习方法相比,这种“LaGaBoost脆弱性模型”可以更准确地预测投资组合损失的上尾。我们还研究了预测精度差异的原因,并找到了各种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning for Corporate Default Risk: Multi-Period Prediction, Frailty Correlation, Loan Portfolios, and Tail Probabilities
We use machine learning methods for modeling multi-period corporate default probabilities and obtain higher prediction accuracy compared to linear models with the differences being larger for longer prediction horizons. Overall, tree-boosting has the highest prediction accuracy. In addition, we introduce a novel hybrid econometric-machine learning model combining tree-boosting with a latent frailty model. This ``LaGaBoost frailty model" results in more accurate predictions of upper tails of portfolio losses compared to both a linear frailty model and machine learning methods ignoring frailty correlation. We also investigate the reasons and find various explanations for the observed differences in prediction accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wealth Management Products, Banking Competition, and Stability: Evidence from China Mirco-level Prediction of Outstanding Claim Counts using Neural Networks Lending Competition, Regulation and Non-Traditional Mortgages PE for the Public: The Rise of SPACs Lawmaking Without Law: How Overreliance on Economics Fails Financial Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1