民主仍在运动:2013年古巴选举结果

A. August
{"title":"民主仍在运动:2013年古巴选举结果","authors":"A. August","doi":"10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.1.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe elections to the Cuban Parliament, or the National Assembly of People's Power (ANPP), took place on February 3, 2013. The voting trends, tendencies and weaknesses in the electoral system identified in my recent book-length study of elections from 1993-2008 have been confirmed by the 2013 voting results (August, 2013).1 This kind of detailed endeavour, although virtually unique, is worthwhile, especially in light of the disinformation and misinformation disseminated by supporters of 'regime change' in Cuba across the spectrum from the so-called 'left' to the right, who replace facts, figures and a balanced analysis with cliches and ignorance.One of the most important voting results to take into account is the 'united' or slate vote (voto unido). This refers to the voting system used in national and provincial elections, in which citizens can vote for the entire slate of candidates in their municipality, as opposed to exercising a selective vote for one or more, but not all, of the candidates in multi-seat municipal constituencies (August, 2013: 174-78; Table 7.9).2 In the elections from 1993 to 2008, the government, the parliament presidency, the party, the mass organizations and the press appealed very strongly to citizens to vote for the whole slate, for the voto unido. However, the proportion voting for the slate vote declined from 95.06 per cent in 1993 to 90.90 per cent in 2008. Ipso facto, the selective vote increased substantially from 1993 to 1998 - more than doubling (August, 2013: Table 7.9).the voto unido in 2013With regard to this trend, at the time and as part of my fieldwork in 2007-2009, several specialists from the academic world were interviewed and their views collected. For example, University of Havana political scientist Emilio Duharte Diaz points to weaknesses in the composition of the candidacies commissions responsible for drawing up lists of candidates to be nominated and offers some suggestions for improvement. Specifically concerning the voting pattern cited above, slate versus selective vote, he considers the election trend as a reflection of the 'critical revolutionary vote', meaning that the citizens are not going beyond the boundaries of the Revolution and the Cuban political system, but rather expressing their discontent with some important aspects of it, with the goal of improving it. If the candidacies commissions are not expanded and further perfected, Duharte Diaz points out, when it comes time to vote, citizens will feel that they are caught up in an 'electoral straitjacket'. (August, 2013: 171-73, 180). Another political system specialist, Jesus Garcia Brigos, reveals a concrete example of how the candidacies commissions, if not improved, can lead to negative consequences (August, 2013: 173). As for Rafael Hernandez, editor of the critical review Temas, he calls for a change in procedure for the candidacies commissions as well as its composition; otherwise, people will consider that the list of nominees has gone through a filtering process (proceso de filtraje) (August, 2013: 162, 173). University of Havana law professor Martha Prieto Valdez also calls for drastic expansion of the nomination procedures and rights of citizens (August, 2013: 173).In 2013, there was also a major shift in the official policy. For the first time since elections to the Cuban parliament were held, there was no call at all, by the institutions noted above, for a slate vote, a voto unido. Thus the voting trends, and concerns expressed by political specialists, were borne out in 2013: the call for a slate vote was abandoned and the floodgates fully opened up. The proportion of citizens exercising the slate vote, in decline since 1993, now plummeted from 90.90 per cent in 2008 to 81.29 per cent in February 2013. Conversely, the selective vote doubled from 9.10 per cent in 2008 to 18.07 per cent in 2013 (Granma Internacional, 8 February 2013). The 'critical revolutionary vote' and the desire to break out of the electoral straitjacket were asserted even further in 2013. …","PeriodicalId":254309,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Cuban Studies","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy Still in Motion: The 2013 Election Results in Cuba\",\"authors\":\"A. August\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.1.0087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionThe elections to the Cuban Parliament, or the National Assembly of People's Power (ANPP), took place on February 3, 2013. The voting trends, tendencies and weaknesses in the electoral system identified in my recent book-length study of elections from 1993-2008 have been confirmed by the 2013 voting results (August, 2013).1 This kind of detailed endeavour, although virtually unique, is worthwhile, especially in light of the disinformation and misinformation disseminated by supporters of 'regime change' in Cuba across the spectrum from the so-called 'left' to the right, who replace facts, figures and a balanced analysis with cliches and ignorance.One of the most important voting results to take into account is the 'united' or slate vote (voto unido). This refers to the voting system used in national and provincial elections, in which citizens can vote for the entire slate of candidates in their municipality, as opposed to exercising a selective vote for one or more, but not all, of the candidates in multi-seat municipal constituencies (August, 2013: 174-78; Table 7.9).2 In the elections from 1993 to 2008, the government, the parliament presidency, the party, the mass organizations and the press appealed very strongly to citizens to vote for the whole slate, for the voto unido. However, the proportion voting for the slate vote declined from 95.06 per cent in 1993 to 90.90 per cent in 2008. Ipso facto, the selective vote increased substantially from 1993 to 1998 - more than doubling (August, 2013: Table 7.9).the voto unido in 2013With regard to this trend, at the time and as part of my fieldwork in 2007-2009, several specialists from the academic world were interviewed and their views collected. For example, University of Havana political scientist Emilio Duharte Diaz points to weaknesses in the composition of the candidacies commissions responsible for drawing up lists of candidates to be nominated and offers some suggestions for improvement. Specifically concerning the voting pattern cited above, slate versus selective vote, he considers the election trend as a reflection of the 'critical revolutionary vote', meaning that the citizens are not going beyond the boundaries of the Revolution and the Cuban political system, but rather expressing their discontent with some important aspects of it, with the goal of improving it. If the candidacies commissions are not expanded and further perfected, Duharte Diaz points out, when it comes time to vote, citizens will feel that they are caught up in an 'electoral straitjacket'. (August, 2013: 171-73, 180). Another political system specialist, Jesus Garcia Brigos, reveals a concrete example of how the candidacies commissions, if not improved, can lead to negative consequences (August, 2013: 173). As for Rafael Hernandez, editor of the critical review Temas, he calls for a change in procedure for the candidacies commissions as well as its composition; otherwise, people will consider that the list of nominees has gone through a filtering process (proceso de filtraje) (August, 2013: 162, 173). University of Havana law professor Martha Prieto Valdez also calls for drastic expansion of the nomination procedures and rights of citizens (August, 2013: 173).In 2013, there was also a major shift in the official policy. For the first time since elections to the Cuban parliament were held, there was no call at all, by the institutions noted above, for a slate vote, a voto unido. Thus the voting trends, and concerns expressed by political specialists, were borne out in 2013: the call for a slate vote was abandoned and the floodgates fully opened up. The proportion of citizens exercising the slate vote, in decline since 1993, now plummeted from 90.90 per cent in 2008 to 81.29 per cent in February 2013. Conversely, the selective vote doubled from 9.10 per cent in 2008 to 18.07 per cent in 2013 (Granma Internacional, 8 February 2013). The 'critical revolutionary vote' and the desire to break out of the electoral straitjacket were asserted even further in 2013. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":254309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Cuban Studies\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Cuban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.1.0087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Cuban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/INTEJCUBASTUD.6.1.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

古巴议会选举于2013年2月3日举行,即全国人民权力大会(ANPP)。在我最近对1993-2008年选举进行的长篇研究中发现的投票趋势、趋势和选举制度中的弱点已经被2013年的投票结果所证实(2013年8月)这种细致的努力,虽然实际上是独一无二的,但是值得的,特别是考虑到古巴“政权更迭”支持者散布的虚假信息和错误信息,从所谓的“左翼”到右翼,他们用陈词滥调和无知取代事实、数据和平衡的分析。需要考虑的最重要的投票结果之一是“联合投票”或石板投票(voto unido)。这是指在全国和省级选举中使用的投票制度,在这种制度中,公民可以投票给他们所在城市的全部候选人,而不是在多席位的市政选区中对一个或多个候选人进行选择性投票(August, 2013: 174-78;表7.9)。2在1993年至2008年的选举中,政府、议会主席、政党、群众组织和媒体都强烈呼吁公民投票给整个名单,投票给选举组织。然而,投票的比例从1993年的95.06%下降到2008年的90.90%。事实上,选择性投票从1993年到1998年大幅增加,增加了一倍多(2013年8月:表7.9)。关于这一趋势,当时以及作为我2007-2009年实地工作的一部分,我采访了学术界的几位专家,并收集了他们的观点。例如,哈瓦那大学政治学家埃米利奥·杜哈特·迪亚兹指出,负责拟定提名候选人名单的候选人委员会在组成方面存在弱点,并提出一些改进建议。就上述投票模式而言,即直接投票与选择性投票,他认为选举趋势反映了“关键性革命投票”,意即公民并未超越革命与古巴政治制度的界限,而是表达对某些重要方面的不满,目标是改善制度。杜哈特·迪亚兹指出,如果候选人委员会不扩大和进一步完善,到投票的时候,公民会觉得他们被“选举束缚”了。[j] .农业科学学报,2013:1771 - 73,180。另一位政治制度专家Jesus Garcia Brigos揭示了一个具体的例子,说明如果不改进候选委员会,可能会导致负面后果(August, 2013: 173)。至于批评评论《Temas》的编辑拉斐尔·埃尔南德斯,他呼吁改变候选人委员会的程序及其组成;否则,人们会认为提名者名单经过了筛选过程(proco de filtraje) (August, 2013: 162,173)。哈瓦那大学法学教授Martha Prieto Valdez也呼吁大幅扩大提名程序和公民权利(2013年8月:173)。2013年,官方政策也发生了重大转变。自举行古巴议会选举以来,上述各机构第一次完全没有要求进行名单投票,即投票赞成。因此,投票趋势和政治专家表达的担忧在2013年得到了证实:要求进行名单投票的呼吁被放弃,闸门完全打开。自1993年以来,公民投票的比例一直在下降,从2008年的90.90%暴跌至2013年2月的81.29%。相反,选择性投票从2008年的9.10%增加到2013年的18.07%(格拉玛国际报,2013年2月8日)。“关键的革命投票”和打破选举束缚的愿望在2013年得到了进一步的断言。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democracy Still in Motion: The 2013 Election Results in Cuba
IntroductionThe elections to the Cuban Parliament, or the National Assembly of People's Power (ANPP), took place on February 3, 2013. The voting trends, tendencies and weaknesses in the electoral system identified in my recent book-length study of elections from 1993-2008 have been confirmed by the 2013 voting results (August, 2013).1 This kind of detailed endeavour, although virtually unique, is worthwhile, especially in light of the disinformation and misinformation disseminated by supporters of 'regime change' in Cuba across the spectrum from the so-called 'left' to the right, who replace facts, figures and a balanced analysis with cliches and ignorance.One of the most important voting results to take into account is the 'united' or slate vote (voto unido). This refers to the voting system used in national and provincial elections, in which citizens can vote for the entire slate of candidates in their municipality, as opposed to exercising a selective vote for one or more, but not all, of the candidates in multi-seat municipal constituencies (August, 2013: 174-78; Table 7.9).2 In the elections from 1993 to 2008, the government, the parliament presidency, the party, the mass organizations and the press appealed very strongly to citizens to vote for the whole slate, for the voto unido. However, the proportion voting for the slate vote declined from 95.06 per cent in 1993 to 90.90 per cent in 2008. Ipso facto, the selective vote increased substantially from 1993 to 1998 - more than doubling (August, 2013: Table 7.9).the voto unido in 2013With regard to this trend, at the time and as part of my fieldwork in 2007-2009, several specialists from the academic world were interviewed and their views collected. For example, University of Havana political scientist Emilio Duharte Diaz points to weaknesses in the composition of the candidacies commissions responsible for drawing up lists of candidates to be nominated and offers some suggestions for improvement. Specifically concerning the voting pattern cited above, slate versus selective vote, he considers the election trend as a reflection of the 'critical revolutionary vote', meaning that the citizens are not going beyond the boundaries of the Revolution and the Cuban political system, but rather expressing their discontent with some important aspects of it, with the goal of improving it. If the candidacies commissions are not expanded and further perfected, Duharte Diaz points out, when it comes time to vote, citizens will feel that they are caught up in an 'electoral straitjacket'. (August, 2013: 171-73, 180). Another political system specialist, Jesus Garcia Brigos, reveals a concrete example of how the candidacies commissions, if not improved, can lead to negative consequences (August, 2013: 173). As for Rafael Hernandez, editor of the critical review Temas, he calls for a change in procedure for the candidacies commissions as well as its composition; otherwise, people will consider that the list of nominees has gone through a filtering process (proceso de filtraje) (August, 2013: 162, 173). University of Havana law professor Martha Prieto Valdez also calls for drastic expansion of the nomination procedures and rights of citizens (August, 2013: 173).In 2013, there was also a major shift in the official policy. For the first time since elections to the Cuban parliament were held, there was no call at all, by the institutions noted above, for a slate vote, a voto unido. Thus the voting trends, and concerns expressed by political specialists, were borne out in 2013: the call for a slate vote was abandoned and the floodgates fully opened up. The proportion of citizens exercising the slate vote, in decline since 1993, now plummeted from 90.90 per cent in 2008 to 81.29 per cent in February 2013. Conversely, the selective vote doubled from 9.10 per cent in 2008 to 18.07 per cent in 2013 (Granma Internacional, 8 February 2013). The 'critical revolutionary vote' and the desire to break out of the electoral straitjacket were asserted even further in 2013. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Submission guidelines Cuban cinema, crisis or transition? Negotiating a cultural tightrope El Fracaso De Las Compañías De Seguros De Esclavos: Cuba a Partir De la Experiencia Norteamericana Cuba: Plus ça Change? Dangerous Marielitos: Wisconsin Newspapers and the Proliferation of a Negative Representation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1