N. Doorn, Diane P. Michelfelder, E. Barrella, Terry Bristol, F. Dechesne, Albrecht Fritzsche, G. Johnson, M. Poznic, W. Robison, Barbara K. Sain, Taylor Stone, T. Rodriguez-Nikl, Steven Umbrello, P. Vermaas, Richard L. Wilson
{"title":"重塑工程的未来","authors":"N. Doorn, Diane P. Michelfelder, E. Barrella, Terry Bristol, F. Dechesne, Albrecht Fritzsche, G. Johnson, M. Poznic, W. Robison, Barbara K. Sain, Taylor Stone, T. Rodriguez-Nikl, Steven Umbrello, P. Vermaas, Richard L. Wilson","doi":"10.4324/9781315276502-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reimagining suggests the idea of opening up new, unconventional spaces of possibilities for an activity or an entity that already exists. At its most transformative, the activity of reimagining develops spaces of possibilities that alter the very definition of that activity or entity. What, then, would it be to reimagine the future of engineering? An exploration of such a topic cannot be done well by a single individual but rather requires the combined perspectives and insights of a number of people. The thoughts presented in this chapter had their beginnings in a workshop on this topic which took place at a meeting of the Forum on Philosophy, Engineering and Technology (fPET) at the University of Maryland, College Park, in 2018. Because participants in the workshop came from the fPET community, they included philoso-phers and engineers from both inside and outside the academy. On this account, reimagining the future of engineering is a matter of reimagining and redrawing the spaces of engineering itself: spaces for designing, action, problem framing, professional and disciplinary identity, and for the training of future engineers.","PeriodicalId":335274,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining the Future of Engineering\",\"authors\":\"N. Doorn, Diane P. Michelfelder, E. Barrella, Terry Bristol, F. Dechesne, Albrecht Fritzsche, G. Johnson, M. Poznic, W. Robison, Barbara K. Sain, Taylor Stone, T. Rodriguez-Nikl, Steven Umbrello, P. Vermaas, Richard L. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315276502-64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reimagining suggests the idea of opening up new, unconventional spaces of possibilities for an activity or an entity that already exists. At its most transformative, the activity of reimagining develops spaces of possibilities that alter the very definition of that activity or entity. What, then, would it be to reimagine the future of engineering? An exploration of such a topic cannot be done well by a single individual but rather requires the combined perspectives and insights of a number of people. The thoughts presented in this chapter had their beginnings in a workshop on this topic which took place at a meeting of the Forum on Philosophy, Engineering and Technology (fPET) at the University of Maryland, College Park, in 2018. Because participants in the workshop came from the fPET community, they included philoso-phers and engineers from both inside and outside the academy. On this account, reimagining the future of engineering is a matter of reimagining and redrawing the spaces of engineering itself: spaces for designing, action, problem framing, professional and disciplinary identity, and for the training of future engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering\",\"volume\":\"172 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276502-64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276502-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reimagining suggests the idea of opening up new, unconventional spaces of possibilities for an activity or an entity that already exists. At its most transformative, the activity of reimagining develops spaces of possibilities that alter the very definition of that activity or entity. What, then, would it be to reimagine the future of engineering? An exploration of such a topic cannot be done well by a single individual but rather requires the combined perspectives and insights of a number of people. The thoughts presented in this chapter had their beginnings in a workshop on this topic which took place at a meeting of the Forum on Philosophy, Engineering and Technology (fPET) at the University of Maryland, College Park, in 2018. Because participants in the workshop came from the fPET community, they included philoso-phers and engineers from both inside and outside the academy. On this account, reimagining the future of engineering is a matter of reimagining and redrawing the spaces of engineering itself: spaces for designing, action, problem framing, professional and disciplinary identity, and for the training of future engineers.