美洲人权法院基于对苏库鲁土著人民及其成员诉巴西案的分析的结构性判决

G. Hoffmann
{"title":"美洲人权法院基于对苏库鲁土著人民及其成员诉巴西案的分析的结构性判决","authors":"G. Hoffmann","doi":"10.36592/9786581110451-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking as an horizon the case “Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil” judged by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2018, which was taken to Inter-American Court of Human Rights due to the delay in the process of demarcating indigenous territories, questions are raised regarding the conduct of the court as a judicial means in the protection of rights and establishment of measures aimed at not perpetuating rights violations recognized in the American Convention. This is because the Inter-American Court has been, in its decisions, determining the adoption of internal measures by states parties responsible for violations that seek to solve structural problems. This meets the so-called structuring sentences, aimed at rights protection and the non-repetition of the violation. Therefore, this work aims to analyze which measures are determined by the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights in the case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil, from the perspective of structuring sentences. For that, it will be used the deductive method, bibliographic research and case analysis already mentioned.","PeriodicalId":135220,"journal":{"name":"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SENTENÇAS ESTRUTURANTES NA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS A PARTIR DA ANÁLISE DO CASO DO POVO INDÍGENA XUCURU E SEUS MEMBROS VS. BRASIL\",\"authors\":\"G. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.36592/9786581110451-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking as an horizon the case “Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil” judged by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2018, which was taken to Inter-American Court of Human Rights due to the delay in the process of demarcating indigenous territories, questions are raised regarding the conduct of the court as a judicial means in the protection of rights and establishment of measures aimed at not perpetuating rights violations recognized in the American Convention. This is because the Inter-American Court has been, in its decisions, determining the adoption of internal measures by states parties responsible for violations that seek to solve structural problems. This meets the so-called structuring sentences, aimed at rights protection and the non-repetition of the violation. Therefore, this work aims to analyze which measures are determined by the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights in the case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil, from the perspective of structuring sentences. For that, it will be used the deductive method, bibliographic research and case analysis already mentioned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110451-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da VII Jornada da Rede Interamericana de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia (2020). Volume I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110451-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为地平线如此”的Xucuru原住民及其成员与巴西”从美洲人权法院在2018年,它被带到美洲人权法院由于延迟界定原住民地区的过程中,产生质疑的行为法院作为司法手段保护措施的权利和建立针对不延续人权公约承认在美国。这是因为美洲法院在其决定中一直确定对违反行为负责的缔约国采取的内部措施是为了解决结构性问题。这符合所谓的结构句,旨在保护权利和不重复侵犯。因此,本研究旨在分析美洲人权法院在xuucuru土著人及其成员诉巴西一案中,从句子结构的角度决定了哪些措施。为此,本文将运用前面提到的演绎法、文献研究法和案例分析法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SENTENÇAS ESTRUTURANTES NA CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS A PARTIR DA ANÁLISE DO CASO DO POVO INDÍGENA XUCURU E SEUS MEMBROS VS. BRASIL
Taking as an horizon the case “Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil” judged by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2018, which was taken to Inter-American Court of Human Rights due to the delay in the process of demarcating indigenous territories, questions are raised regarding the conduct of the court as a judicial means in the protection of rights and establishment of measures aimed at not perpetuating rights violations recognized in the American Convention. This is because the Inter-American Court has been, in its decisions, determining the adoption of internal measures by states parties responsible for violations that seek to solve structural problems. This meets the so-called structuring sentences, aimed at rights protection and the non-repetition of the violation. Therefore, this work aims to analyze which measures are determined by the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights in the case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its member vs. Brazil, from the perspective of structuring sentences. For that, it will be used the deductive method, bibliographic research and case analysis already mentioned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CIBERDEMOCRACIA E A CRISE DE REPRESENTATIVIDADE NO BRASIL: A PLURALIDADE DE VOZES NO AMBIENTE DEMOCRÁTICO POLÍTICAS JUDICIÁRIAS AO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À SEGURANÇA, DIGNIDADE E IGUALDADE ATRAVÉS DE DECISÕES JUDICIAIS ESTAVEIS A INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL À SERVIÇO DA DISCRIMINAÇÃO E DO PRECONCEITO EM NOME DA LEI E DA ORDEM PARA COMBATER O BOM COMBATE: A RELIGIÃO NO PROCESSO ELEITORAL BRASILEIRO A EXCESSIVA MEDICALIZAÇÃO DA INFÂNCIA: COLISÃO ENTRE O DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À SAÚDE E O PRINCÍPIO DO MELHOR INTERESSE DA CRIANÇA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1