人机协作工作场所的身心工作量评估综述

Guilherme Deola Borges, André Cardoso, Hatice Gonçalves, Ana Colim, P. Carneiro, P. Arezes
{"title":"人机协作工作场所的身心工作量评估综述","authors":"Guilherme Deola Borges, André Cardoso, Hatice Gonçalves, Ana Colim, P. Carneiro, P. Arezes","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) systems are often chosen to improve ergonomics in manual tasks. There are many metrics available to quantify the ergonomic benefits when implementing an HRC. It is important to understand which metrics (ergonomic methods, tests, questionnaires) are being used by researchers in terms of physical and mental workloads assessment. Therefore, this work aimed to review the literature on the subject and to provide key information for further investigations. A literature review was carried out in four databases and the findings were categorized into theoretical surveys and empirical studies from the last five years. Results show the emerging research fields that were identified and analyzed. The metrics used to assess physical and mental workloads were discussed and a new meaning for these results is proposed in the sense of using a global ergonomic risk assessment as input in simulation models.","PeriodicalId":116806,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2021) Future Trends and Applications","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical and Mental Workload Assessment in Human-Robot Collaboration Workplaces - A Review\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Deola Borges, André Cardoso, Hatice Gonçalves, Ana Colim, P. Carneiro, P. Arezes\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1001156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) systems are often chosen to improve ergonomics in manual tasks. There are many metrics available to quantify the ergonomic benefits when implementing an HRC. It is important to understand which metrics (ergonomic methods, tests, questionnaires) are being used by researchers in terms of physical and mental workloads assessment. Therefore, this work aimed to review the literature on the subject and to provide key information for further investigations. A literature review was carried out in four databases and the findings were categorized into theoretical surveys and empirical studies from the last five years. Results show the emerging research fields that were identified and analyzed. The metrics used to assess physical and mental workloads were discussed and a new meaning for these results is proposed in the sense of using a global ergonomic risk assessment as input in simulation models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2021) Future Trends and Applications\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2021) Future Trends and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2021) Future Trends and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人-机器人协作(HRC)系统经常被选择来改善手工任务的人体工程学。在执行HRC时,有许多可用于量化人体工程学效益的指标。重要的是要了解哪些指标(人体工程学方法,测试,问卷调查)正在使用的研究人员在身体和精神负荷的评估。因此,本工作旨在回顾有关该主题的文献,并为进一步研究提供关键信息。在四个数据库中进行了文献综述,并将研究结果分为近五年来的理论调查和实证研究。结果显示了识别和分析的新兴研究领域。讨论了用于评估身体和精神工作量的指标,并提出了这些结果的新含义,即在模拟模型中使用全球人体工程学风险评估作为输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical and Mental Workload Assessment in Human-Robot Collaboration Workplaces - A Review
Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) systems are often chosen to improve ergonomics in manual tasks. There are many metrics available to quantify the ergonomic benefits when implementing an HRC. It is important to understand which metrics (ergonomic methods, tests, questionnaires) are being used by researchers in terms of physical and mental workloads assessment. Therefore, this work aimed to review the literature on the subject and to provide key information for further investigations. A literature review was carried out in four databases and the findings were categorized into theoretical surveys and empirical studies from the last five years. Results show the emerging research fields that were identified and analyzed. The metrics used to assess physical and mental workloads were discussed and a new meaning for these results is proposed in the sense of using a global ergonomic risk assessment as input in simulation models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitization of Pre-election Messages during the 2021 Parliamentary Campaign in Bulgaria Considering the need for new aspects in route planners Characterizing soft modes’ traveling in urban areas though indicators and simulated scenarios Design of an Exoskeleton to Prevent and to Take Care of the Spinal Column of Injuries of Low Back Pain OHS Management Skill Development and Continuing Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1