海运集装箱货物运输国际贸易术语解释通则中自由承运人标准类型研究——以韩国贸易公司为例

Jung Sun Lee, Eunsook Huh
{"title":"海运集装箱货物运输国际贸易术语解释通则中自由承运人标准类型研究——以韩国贸易公司为例","authors":"Jung Sun Lee, Eunsook Huh","doi":"10.16980/JITC.13.5.201710.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) has attempted to replace the current FOB (Free On Board) terms with FCA (Free Carrier) since Incoterms 1990. As the delivery of goods in se almoaborne container cargos is completed inland and not on board the vessel, problems can occur regarding the point at which the risk and delivery pass from a seller to a buyer. Therefore, the Incoterms 2010 recommend FCA instead of FOB for container cargos because the containers are delivered regularly in one place of inland or the container terminal in a port. However, all trade parties use FOB instead of FCA in practice. Hence, it is a pertinent time to analyze FCA, which is the appropriate term to replace FOB, as the latter is currently popular in global export transactions even though it is not a right term. Further, the need exists to create some countermeasures to reduce disputes and misconduct, as there could be multiple delivery locations in the export country under FCA. Therefore, this study suggests standard FCA types by considering delivery points such as FCA Factory, FCA Station, FCA ICD (Inland Container Depot), and FCA CT (Container Terminal) in order to make trade parties use FCA terms easier.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Standard Types of Free Carrier (FCA) on Incoterms for Seaborne Container Goods Transportation: Korean Trade Companies’ Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jung Sun Lee, Eunsook Huh\",\"doi\":\"10.16980/JITC.13.5.201710.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) has attempted to replace the current FOB (Free On Board) terms with FCA (Free Carrier) since Incoterms 1990. As the delivery of goods in se almoaborne container cargos is completed inland and not on board the vessel, problems can occur regarding the point at which the risk and delivery pass from a seller to a buyer. Therefore, the Incoterms 2010 recommend FCA instead of FOB for container cargos because the containers are delivered regularly in one place of inland or the container terminal in a port. However, all trade parties use FOB instead of FCA in practice. Hence, it is a pertinent time to analyze FCA, which is the appropriate term to replace FOB, as the latter is currently popular in global export transactions even though it is not a right term. Further, the need exists to create some countermeasures to reduce disputes and misconduct, as there could be multiple delivery locations in the export country under FCA. Therefore, this study suggests standard FCA types by considering delivery points such as FCA Factory, FCA Station, FCA ICD (Inland Container Depot), and FCA CT (Container Terminal) in order to make trade parties use FCA terms easier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"266 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16980/JITC.13.5.201710.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/JITC.13.5.201710.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1990年国际贸易术语解释通则以来,ICC(国际商会)一直试图用FCA(自由承运人)取代目前的FOB(船上交货)术语。由于海运集装箱货物的交付是在内陆完成的,而不是在船上完成的,因此在风险和交付从卖方转移到买方的点上可能会出现问题。因此,2010年国际贸易术语解释通则建议集装箱货物使用FCA而不是FOB,因为集装箱通常在内陆的一个地方或港口的集装箱码头交付。然而,在实践中,所有贸易方都使用FOB而不是FCA。因此,现在是分析FCA的合适时机,它是代替FOB的合适术语,因为后者虽然不是一个合适的术语,但目前在全球出口交易中很流行。此外,有必要制定一些对策来减少纠纷和不当行为,因为在FCA下,出口国可能有多个交货地点。因此,本研究通过考虑交货点,如FCA工厂、FCA站、FCA ICD(内陆集装箱仓库)和FCA CT(集装箱码头),提出了标准的FCA类型,以使贸易方更容易使用FCA术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study on Standard Types of Free Carrier (FCA) on Incoterms for Seaborne Container Goods Transportation: Korean Trade Companies’ Perspective
The ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) has attempted to replace the current FOB (Free On Board) terms with FCA (Free Carrier) since Incoterms 1990. As the delivery of goods in se almoaborne container cargos is completed inland and not on board the vessel, problems can occur regarding the point at which the risk and delivery pass from a seller to a buyer. Therefore, the Incoterms 2010 recommend FCA instead of FOB for container cargos because the containers are delivered regularly in one place of inland or the container terminal in a port. However, all trade parties use FOB instead of FCA in practice. Hence, it is a pertinent time to analyze FCA, which is the appropriate term to replace FOB, as the latter is currently popular in global export transactions even though it is not a right term. Further, the need exists to create some countermeasures to reduce disputes and misconduct, as there could be multiple delivery locations in the export country under FCA. Therefore, this study suggests standard FCA types by considering delivery points such as FCA Factory, FCA Station, FCA ICD (Inland Container Depot), and FCA CT (Container Terminal) in order to make trade parties use FCA terms easier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La garantía legal del Estatuto del Consumidor como mecanismo para proteger al comprador frente a vicios inmobiliarios progresivos (The Legal Guarantee of the Consumers Statute as a Mechanism to Protect Buyer Front of Progressive Real Estate Vices) Solidarismo y contratos relacionales: alternativas frente a la pandemia de covid-19 (Contractual Solidarism and Relational Contract Theory: Alternative Approaches to Contract Law in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic) Error Correction Mechanisms for Transactional Script Smart Contracts The Shadows of Litigation Finance Malas leyes (Bad Law)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1