社会嵌入知识网络与意见领袖的形成:来自Twitter的证据

Hao Bo
{"title":"社会嵌入知识网络与意见领袖的形成:来自Twitter的证据","authors":"Hao Bo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3493065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on knowledge markets exploring how network relationships between knowledge consumers impact the equilibrium number of opinion leaders. Both a theoretical model and empirical analysis show that there’ll be more opinion leaders in a knowledge market if the most active knowledge consumers occupy more central positions in a social network connecting consumers. The model formalizes the following story. Knowledge consumers are embedded in network relationships through which they influence each other on which opinion providers they pay attention to. If the most active (thus most capable to influence) knowledge consumers occupy more central network positions, consumer attention gravitates toward some opinion providers, and this turns more opinion providers into opinion leaders. The model inspires and is supported by empirical analysis using a Twitter network and associated tweets. First, unsupervised machine learning is used to define knowledge markets: topic modeling finds 45 topics in tweets, network community detection yields 4 nearly isolated Twitter sub-networks, and a knowledge market is then defined by a combination of one topic and one sub-network. Second, with each knowledge market being a unit of observation, we define variables and test our theoretical predictions. This is the first paper to formally define opinion leaders, knowledge markets, and consumer attention. While the existing literature emphasizes the role of opinion providers’ network positions on the making of opinion leaders, this work shows the network positions of active consumers matter because active consumers serve as a propagation machine.","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially Embedded Knowledge Networks and the Making of Opinion Leaders: Evidence from Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Hao Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3493065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on knowledge markets exploring how network relationships between knowledge consumers impact the equilibrium number of opinion leaders. Both a theoretical model and empirical analysis show that there’ll be more opinion leaders in a knowledge market if the most active knowledge consumers occupy more central positions in a social network connecting consumers. The model formalizes the following story. Knowledge consumers are embedded in network relationships through which they influence each other on which opinion providers they pay attention to. If the most active (thus most capable to influence) knowledge consumers occupy more central network positions, consumer attention gravitates toward some opinion providers, and this turns more opinion providers into opinion leaders. The model inspires and is supported by empirical analysis using a Twitter network and associated tweets. First, unsupervised machine learning is used to define knowledge markets: topic modeling finds 45 topics in tweets, network community detection yields 4 nearly isolated Twitter sub-networks, and a knowledge market is then defined by a combination of one topic and one sub-network. Second, with each knowledge market being a unit of observation, we define variables and test our theoretical predictions. This is the first paper to formally define opinion leaders, knowledge markets, and consumer attention. While the existing literature emphasizes the role of opinion providers’ network positions on the making of opinion leaders, this work shows the network positions of active consumers matter because active consumers serve as a propagation machine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以知识市场为研究对象,探讨了知识消费者之间的网络关系对意见领袖均衡数量的影响。理论模型和实证分析都表明,如果最活跃的知识消费者在连接消费者的社会网络中占据更多的中心位置,那么知识市场中的意见领袖就会更多。该模型形式化了下面的故事。知识消费者嵌入在网络关系中,通过网络关系,他们相互影响,他们关注意见提供者。如果最活跃(因此最有能力影响)的知识消费者占据更多的网络中心位置,消费者的注意力就会向一些意见提供者倾斜,这就会使更多的意见提供者成为意见领袖。该模型启发并得到了使用Twitter网络和相关tweet的实证分析的支持。首先,使用无监督机器学习来定义知识市场:主题建模在tweet中找到45个主题,网络社区检测产生4个几乎隔离的Twitter子网络,然后通过一个主题和一个子网络的组合来定义知识市场。其次,每个知识市场都是一个观察单位,我们定义变量并测试我们的理论预测。这是第一篇正式定义意见领袖、知识市场和消费者注意力的论文。虽然现有文献强调意见提供者的网络地位对意见领袖的形成的作用,但这项工作表明,活跃消费者的网络地位很重要,因为活跃消费者充当了传播机器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socially Embedded Knowledge Networks and the Making of Opinion Leaders: Evidence from Twitter
This paper focuses on knowledge markets exploring how network relationships between knowledge consumers impact the equilibrium number of opinion leaders. Both a theoretical model and empirical analysis show that there’ll be more opinion leaders in a knowledge market if the most active knowledge consumers occupy more central positions in a social network connecting consumers. The model formalizes the following story. Knowledge consumers are embedded in network relationships through which they influence each other on which opinion providers they pay attention to. If the most active (thus most capable to influence) knowledge consumers occupy more central network positions, consumer attention gravitates toward some opinion providers, and this turns more opinion providers into opinion leaders. The model inspires and is supported by empirical analysis using a Twitter network and associated tweets. First, unsupervised machine learning is used to define knowledge markets: topic modeling finds 45 topics in tweets, network community detection yields 4 nearly isolated Twitter sub-networks, and a knowledge market is then defined by a combination of one topic and one sub-network. Second, with each knowledge market being a unit of observation, we define variables and test our theoretical predictions. This is the first paper to formally define opinion leaders, knowledge markets, and consumer attention. While the existing literature emphasizes the role of opinion providers’ network positions on the making of opinion leaders, this work shows the network positions of active consumers matter because active consumers serve as a propagation machine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1