印尼安汶达鲁萨兰国大学资产所有权基础二元论的法律分析

N. S. Ramadhan, Sulistyandari Сулістандарі, R. Bintoro
{"title":"印尼安汶达鲁萨兰国大学资产所有权基础二元论的法律分析","authors":"N. S. Ramadhan, Sulistyandari Сулістандарі, R. Bintoro","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.159.267275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nLaw Number 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education Article 60, paragraph 3 states that the community establishes private universities by showing an organizing body with a non-profit principle, namely the Foundation. Based on the description above, the Foundation is one of the social, legal entities that can be a forum for private universities. Usually, the ownership of a university asset is only owned by one Foundation. However, in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, number 2860K/PDT/2016, the parties involved in the decision are the Darussalam Maluku Foundation as the plaintiff and the Darussalam Maluku Education Foundation as the defendant. The Darussalam Maluku Foundation sued the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation. After all, the Yayasan Darussalam Maluku Foundation felt aggrieved because the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation had unilaterally claimed and controlled the assets of Darussalam University of Ambon campus 2, which then led to the Foundation's dualism over the ownership of Darussalam University of Ambon assets. This study analyzes the legal consequences of the Foundation's duality on the Foundation and the university. The research method is normative, using secondary data from library research, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. So dualism legal consequences of the Foundation are the Foundation's dissolution and the Foundation's merger. Meanwhile, the legal implications of the Foundation's dualism on universities are related to higher education institutions' accreditation and operational permits and the staffing status of lecturers and experts. However, they will tell the university's right to issue diplomas for students who have completed their education.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Analysis of Foundation Dualism on Darussalam University Asset Ownership in Ambon, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"N. S. Ramadhan, Sulistyandari Сулістандарі, R. Bintoro\",\"doi\":\"10.21564/2414-990x.159.267275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract\\nLaw Number 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education Article 60, paragraph 3 states that the community establishes private universities by showing an organizing body with a non-profit principle, namely the Foundation. Based on the description above, the Foundation is one of the social, legal entities that can be a forum for private universities. Usually, the ownership of a university asset is only owned by one Foundation. However, in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, number 2860K/PDT/2016, the parties involved in the decision are the Darussalam Maluku Foundation as the plaintiff and the Darussalam Maluku Education Foundation as the defendant. The Darussalam Maluku Foundation sued the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation. After all, the Yayasan Darussalam Maluku Foundation felt aggrieved because the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation had unilaterally claimed and controlled the assets of Darussalam University of Ambon campus 2, which then led to the Foundation's dualism over the ownership of Darussalam University of Ambon assets. This study analyzes the legal consequences of the Foundation's duality on the Foundation and the university. The research method is normative, using secondary data from library research, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. So dualism legal consequences of the Foundation are the Foundation's dissolution and the Foundation's merger. Meanwhile, the legal implications of the Foundation's dualism on universities are related to higher education institutions' accreditation and operational permits and the staffing status of lecturers and experts. However, they will tell the university's right to issue diplomas for students who have completed their education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.159.267275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.159.267275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】2012年《高等教育法》第60条第3款规定:“社会以非营利为宗旨的组织机构即基金会设立私立大学。”基于上述描述,该基金会是一个社会法人实体,可以成为私立大学的论坛。通常,大学资产的所有权只属于一个基金会。然而,在印度尼西亚共和国最高法院第2860K/PDT/2016号判决书中,涉及的当事方是原告达鲁萨兰国马鲁古基金会和被告达鲁萨兰国马鲁古教育基金会。达鲁萨兰国马鲁古基金会起诉了Pendidikan达鲁萨兰国马鲁古基金会。毕竟,Yayasan Darussalam Maluku基金会感到委屈,因为Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku基金会单方面声称并控制了达鲁萨兰国大学安汶校区2的资产,这导致了基金会对达鲁萨兰国大学安汶校区资产所有权的二元论。本研究分析了基金会的二元性对基金会和大学的法律后果。研究方法是规范的,使用图书馆研究的二手数据,包括初级,二级和三级法律来源。因此基金会的二元论法律后果是基金会的解散和基金会的合并。同时,基金会二元论对大学的法律影响涉及到高等教育机构的认证和业务许可以及讲师和专家的人员配备状况。然而,他们会告诉大学有权为完成学业的学生颁发文凭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal Analysis of Foundation Dualism on Darussalam University Asset Ownership in Ambon, Indonesia
Abstract Law Number 12 of 2012 concerning Higher Education Article 60, paragraph 3 states that the community establishes private universities by showing an organizing body with a non-profit principle, namely the Foundation. Based on the description above, the Foundation is one of the social, legal entities that can be a forum for private universities. Usually, the ownership of a university asset is only owned by one Foundation. However, in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, number 2860K/PDT/2016, the parties involved in the decision are the Darussalam Maluku Foundation as the plaintiff and the Darussalam Maluku Education Foundation as the defendant. The Darussalam Maluku Foundation sued the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation. After all, the Yayasan Darussalam Maluku Foundation felt aggrieved because the Pendidikan Darussalam Maluku Foundation had unilaterally claimed and controlled the assets of Darussalam University of Ambon campus 2, which then led to the Foundation's dualism over the ownership of Darussalam University of Ambon assets. This study analyzes the legal consequences of the Foundation's duality on the Foundation and the university. The research method is normative, using secondary data from library research, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. So dualism legal consequences of the Foundation are the Foundation's dissolution and the Foundation's merger. Meanwhile, the legal implications of the Foundation's dualism on universities are related to higher education institutions' accreditation and operational permits and the staffing status of lecturers and experts. However, they will tell the university's right to issue diplomas for students who have completed their education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1