综合指数法预测每日空气污染指数

N. H. A. Rahman, Muhammad Hisyam Lee
{"title":"综合指数法预测每日空气污染指数","authors":"N. H. A. Rahman, Muhammad Hisyam Lee","doi":"10.1063/1.5121130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement enhance the ability to measure the air quality forecast performance in choosing the best forecast method with CI significantly overcome the limitation of existing index measurement. Thus, this study suggests to use the appropriate measurement in accordance to the purpose of forecasting.Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement...","PeriodicalId":325925,"journal":{"name":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","volume":"61 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A combination index measurement in forecasting daily air pollutant index\",\"authors\":\"N. H. A. Rahman, Muhammad Hisyam Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.5121130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement enhance the ability to measure the air quality forecast performance in choosing the best forecast method with CI significantly overcome the limitation of existing index measurement. Thus, this study suggests to use the appropriate measurement in accordance to the purpose of forecasting.Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement...\",\"PeriodicalId\":325925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)\",\"volume\":\"61 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE 4TH INNOVATION AND ANALYTICS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (IACE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

误差大小是预测评价中常用的一种度量方法。然而,预测空气质素的目的是维持空气质素在指定的指引范围内。因此,指数测量是重要的考虑。但是,当该指数用于衡量不同办公室的价值时,问题就出现了,这些测量结果在经常发生的情况下是退化的。因此,本研究旨在克服这两个局限性。利用2005 - 2011年逐日空气污染物指数(API)数据,比较Box-Jenkins方法、人工神经网络(ANN)和混合方法的预测效果。所使用的预测精度测量包括平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对偏差(MAD)、真实预测率(TPR)、假阳性率(FPR)、虚警率(FAR)和成功指数(SI),包括提议的指数测量、组合指数(CI)。研究发现,指数测量增强了空气质量预报性能的测量能力,在选择最佳CI预报方法方面显著克服了现有指数测量的局限性。因此,本研究建议根据预测的目的,使用适当的测量方法。误差大小是预测评价中常用的一种度量方法。然而,预测空气质素的目的是维持空气质素在指定的指引范围内。因此,指数测量是重要的考虑。但是,当该指数用于衡量不同办公室的价值时,问题就出现了,这些测量结果在经常发生的情况下是退化的。因此,本研究旨在克服这两个局限性。利用2005 - 2011年逐日空气污染物指数(API)数据,比较Box-Jenkins方法、人工神经网络(ANN)和混合方法的预测效果。所使用的预测精度测量包括平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对偏差(MAD)、真实预测率(TPR)、假阳性率(FPR)、虚警率(FAR)和成功指数(SI),包括提议的指数测量、组合指数(CI)。结果表明,该指标的测量…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A combination index measurement in forecasting daily air pollutant index
Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement enhance the ability to measure the air quality forecast performance in choosing the best forecast method with CI significantly overcome the limitation of existing index measurement. Thus, this study suggests to use the appropriate measurement in accordance to the purpose of forecasting.Error magnitude is a measurement commonly used in forecast evaluation. However, the purpose of forecasting air quality is to maintain the air quality within assigned guidelines. Thus, the index measurement is important to be considered. But, the problem arises when the index is used to gauge the values of different offices and these measurements are found to be degenerate in commonly occurring situations. Therefore, this study aims to overcome both of the limitations. The daily air pollutant index (API) data from year 2005 to 2011 was used to compare the forecast performance between Box-Jenkins methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and hybrid method. The forecast accuracy measurements used include mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), true predicted rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false alarm rate (FAR) and successful index (SI) including the proposed index measurement, combination index (CI). It is found that the index measurement...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of artificial intelligence in predicting ground settlement on earth slope The most important contaminants of air pollutants in Klang station using multivariate statistical analysis Tourism knowledge discovery through data mining techniques On some specific patterns of τ-adic non-adjacent form expansion over ring Z(τ): An alternative formula Exploratory factor analysis on occupational stress in context of Malaysian sewerage operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1