组合形成中多准则决策方法的比较

Raimonda Martinkutė-Kaulienė, Radvinė Skobaitė, Viktorija Stasytytė, Nijolė Maknickienė
{"title":"组合形成中多准则决策方法的比较","authors":"Raimonda Martinkutė-Kaulienė, Radvinė Skobaitė, Viktorija Stasytytė, Nijolė Maknickienė","doi":"10.46503/qwpu4486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investors apply various methods to select stocks and construct an investment portfolio. In the majority of methods, the principle of diversification is relevant. Also, sometimes investors‘ behaviour generate biases related to portfolio formation. Multicriteria decision-making methods can overcome such shortcomings of investors' decision-making; thus, they are widely used for portfolio selection. In the performed research, the portfolio is constructed from the stocks of the Spanish stock market. Stocks are selected based on financial indicators. SAW and TOPSIS multicriteria methods are used to range the suitable stocks. Portfolio weights are proportionate to the obtained multicriteria rank. Characteristics of the final selected stocks are presented graphically. Expected portfolio return and risk are also described when comparing two portfolios. The results of the research prove that multicriteria decision-making methods are suitable for portfolio formation. However, such portfolios should be kept for a long time in order to receive a return.","PeriodicalId":438645,"journal":{"name":"Finance, Markets and Valuation","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of multicriteria decision-making methods in portfolio formation\",\"authors\":\"Raimonda Martinkutė-Kaulienė, Radvinė Skobaitė, Viktorija Stasytytė, Nijolė Maknickienė\",\"doi\":\"10.46503/qwpu4486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investors apply various methods to select stocks and construct an investment portfolio. In the majority of methods, the principle of diversification is relevant. Also, sometimes investors‘ behaviour generate biases related to portfolio formation. Multicriteria decision-making methods can overcome such shortcomings of investors' decision-making; thus, they are widely used for portfolio selection. In the performed research, the portfolio is constructed from the stocks of the Spanish stock market. Stocks are selected based on financial indicators. SAW and TOPSIS multicriteria methods are used to range the suitable stocks. Portfolio weights are proportionate to the obtained multicriteria rank. Characteristics of the final selected stocks are presented graphically. Expected portfolio return and risk are also described when comparing two portfolios. The results of the research prove that multicriteria decision-making methods are suitable for portfolio formation. However, such portfolios should be kept for a long time in order to receive a return.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance, Markets and Valuation\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance, Markets and Valuation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46503/qwpu4486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance, Markets and Valuation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46503/qwpu4486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

投资者选择股票和构建投资组合的方法多种多样。在大多数方法中,多样化原则是相关的。此外,有时投资者的行为会产生与投资组合形成相关的偏见。多准则决策方法可以克服投资者决策的这些缺点;因此,它们被广泛用于投资组合选择。在进行的研究中,投资组合是由西班牙股票市场的股票构建的。股票是根据财务指标来选择的。采用SAW和TOPSIS多准则法确定了合适的库存范围。组合权重与获得的多准则等级成比例。最后选定的股票的特征用图形表示。在比较两个投资组合时,还描述了预期投资组合收益和风险。研究结果表明,多准则决策方法适用于投资组合的形成。然而,这样的投资组合应该保持很长一段时间才能获得回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of multicriteria decision-making methods in portfolio formation
Investors apply various methods to select stocks and construct an investment portfolio. In the majority of methods, the principle of diversification is relevant. Also, sometimes investors‘ behaviour generate biases related to portfolio formation. Multicriteria decision-making methods can overcome such shortcomings of investors' decision-making; thus, they are widely used for portfolio selection. In the performed research, the portfolio is constructed from the stocks of the Spanish stock market. Stocks are selected based on financial indicators. SAW and TOPSIS multicriteria methods are used to range the suitable stocks. Portfolio weights are proportionate to the obtained multicriteria rank. Characteristics of the final selected stocks are presented graphically. Expected portfolio return and risk are also described when comparing two portfolios. The results of the research prove that multicriteria decision-making methods are suitable for portfolio formation. However, such portfolios should be kept for a long time in order to receive a return.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect on the new investments that the industry and commerce tax has on the business organizations of the municipality of Armenia Quindío - Colombia Diagnosis of Colombia's wholesale electricity market in relation to other Latin American markets Patents and public health Inclusion of accounting for sustainability by professors of accounting programs Farmers’ market as an alternative for strengthening sustainable practices: a study in the city of Marechal Cândido Rondon – Paraná
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1