单元探针模型中前驱搜索的下界

P. Sen, Venkatesh Srinivasan
{"title":"单元探针模型中前驱搜索的下界","authors":"P. Sen, Venkatesh Srinivasan","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2003.1214411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a fundamental problem in data structures, static predecessor searching: Given a subset S of size n from the universe [m], store S so that queries of the form \"What is the predecessor of x in S?\" can be answered efficiently. We study this problem in the cell probe model introduced by Yao [1981]. Recently, Beame and Fich [2002] obtained optimal bounds on the number of probes needed by any deterministic query scheme if the associated storage scheme uses only n/sup O(1)/ cells of word size (log m)/sup O(1)/ bits. We give a new lower bound proof for this problem that matches the bounds of Beame and Fich. Our lower bound proof has the following advantages: it works for randomised query schemes too, while Beame and Fich's proof works for deterministic query schemes only. In addition, it is simpler than Beame and Fich's proof. We prove our lower bound using the round elimination approach of Miltersen, Nisan, Safra and Wigderson [1998]. Using tools from information theory, we prove a strong round elimination lemma for communication complexity that enables us to obtain a tight lower bound for the predecessor problem. We also use our round elimination lemma to obtain a rounds versus communication tradeoff for the 'greater-than' problem, improving on the tradeoff in [1998]. We believe that our round elimination lemma is of independent interest and should have other applications.","PeriodicalId":286846,"journal":{"name":"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower bounds for predecessor searching in the cell probe model\",\"authors\":\"P. Sen, Venkatesh Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCC.2003.1214411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a fundamental problem in data structures, static predecessor searching: Given a subset S of size n from the universe [m], store S so that queries of the form \\\"What is the predecessor of x in S?\\\" can be answered efficiently. We study this problem in the cell probe model introduced by Yao [1981]. Recently, Beame and Fich [2002] obtained optimal bounds on the number of probes needed by any deterministic query scheme if the associated storage scheme uses only n/sup O(1)/ cells of word size (log m)/sup O(1)/ bits. We give a new lower bound proof for this problem that matches the bounds of Beame and Fich. Our lower bound proof has the following advantages: it works for randomised query schemes too, while Beame and Fich's proof works for deterministic query schemes only. In addition, it is simpler than Beame and Fich's proof. We prove our lower bound using the round elimination approach of Miltersen, Nisan, Safra and Wigderson [1998]. Using tools from information theory, we prove a strong round elimination lemma for communication complexity that enables us to obtain a tight lower bound for the predecessor problem. We also use our round elimination lemma to obtain a rounds versus communication tradeoff for the 'greater-than' problem, improving on the tradeoff in [1998]. We believe that our round elimination lemma is of independent interest and should have other applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"246 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"87\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2003.1214411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2003.1214411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

摘要

我们考虑数据结构中的一个基本问题,静态前体搜索:给定宇宙[m]中大小为n的子集S,存储S,以便有效地回答“x在S中的前体是什么?”的查询。我们在Yao[1981]引入的细胞探针模型中研究了这个问题。最近,Beame和Fich[2002]获得了当相关存储方案仅使用n/sup O(1)/个字长(log m)/sup O(1)/位的单元时,任何确定性查询方案所需探针数的最优边界。我们给出了一个新的下界证明,它与Beame和Fich的界相匹配。我们的下界证明有以下优点:它也适用于随机查询方案,而Beame和Fich的证明只适用于确定性查询方案。此外,它比Beame和Fich的证明更简单。我们使用Miltersen, Nisan, Safra和Wigderson[1998]的轮消法证明了我们的下界。利用信息论的工具,我们证明了通信复杂性的一个强轮消引理,使我们能够获得前代问题的紧下界。我们还使用回合消除引理来获得“大于”问题的回合与通信权衡,改进了[1998]的权衡。我们认为我们的轮消引理具有独立的意义,并且应该有其他的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower bounds for predecessor searching in the cell probe model
We consider a fundamental problem in data structures, static predecessor searching: Given a subset S of size n from the universe [m], store S so that queries of the form "What is the predecessor of x in S?" can be answered efficiently. We study this problem in the cell probe model introduced by Yao [1981]. Recently, Beame and Fich [2002] obtained optimal bounds on the number of probes needed by any deterministic query scheme if the associated storage scheme uses only n/sup O(1)/ cells of word size (log m)/sup O(1)/ bits. We give a new lower bound proof for this problem that matches the bounds of Beame and Fich. Our lower bound proof has the following advantages: it works for randomised query schemes too, while Beame and Fich's proof works for deterministic query schemes only. In addition, it is simpler than Beame and Fich's proof. We prove our lower bound using the round elimination approach of Miltersen, Nisan, Safra and Wigderson [1998]. Using tools from information theory, we prove a strong round elimination lemma for communication complexity that enables us to obtain a tight lower bound for the predecessor problem. We also use our round elimination lemma to obtain a rounds versus communication tradeoff for the 'greater-than' problem, improving on the tradeoff in [1998]. We believe that our round elimination lemma is of independent interest and should have other applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inapproximability - some history and some open problems The complexity of stochastic sequences Quantum query complexity and semi-definite programming Lower bounds for predecessor searching in the cell probe model A strong inapproximability gap for a generalization of minimum bisection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1