评价NANDA-I护理诊断、护理结果分类和护理干预分类在初级保健中心护理记录中的应用,Ijebu Ode

O. Omonigho
{"title":"评价NANDA-I护理诊断、护理结果分类和护理干预分类在初级保健中心护理记录中的应用,Ijebu Ode","authors":"O. Omonigho","doi":"10.21522/tijnr.2015.05.01.art003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Documentation of nursing care is core to the Nursing profession and to share information on patients/clients with other nurses and between clinical disciplines and care settings, data needs to be recorded and stored in a standardized form. Therefore, to make the care nurses give to be visible, NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was endorsed to be used for documentation. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether NANDA-I, NIC, & NOC was used for documentation of care at the maternal and infant welfare units of selected Primary Health Centres (PHCs). Methodology: A retrospective descriptive research design was adopted in this study. Random sampling technique was used to select 5 PHCs. All patient nursing care plan records documented with NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was utilized for data analysis. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 for both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Findings revealed that nursing care was documented using NNN. There was no significant difference in the NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, NIC & NOC used as the t calculated value of -1.00 was lesser than the critical value of 1.96, which was not significant at 0.05 alpha levels. Conclusion: This study has evaluated the documentation of care using NNN in PHCs. It is imperative to state that using NNN for documentation of care is a way of showing evidence-based practice. The researcher therefore recommends that the use and documentation quality of the NNN be evaluated periodically, and corresponding feedbacks given to nurses.","PeriodicalId":333762,"journal":{"name":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Use of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification for Documentation of Care in Primary Health Centres, Ijebu Ode\",\"authors\":\"O. Omonigho\",\"doi\":\"10.21522/tijnr.2015.05.01.art003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Documentation of nursing care is core to the Nursing profession and to share information on patients/clients with other nurses and between clinical disciplines and care settings, data needs to be recorded and stored in a standardized form. Therefore, to make the care nurses give to be visible, NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was endorsed to be used for documentation. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether NANDA-I, NIC, & NOC was used for documentation of care at the maternal and infant welfare units of selected Primary Health Centres (PHCs). Methodology: A retrospective descriptive research design was adopted in this study. Random sampling technique was used to select 5 PHCs. All patient nursing care plan records documented with NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was utilized for data analysis. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 for both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Findings revealed that nursing care was documented using NNN. There was no significant difference in the NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, NIC & NOC used as the t calculated value of -1.00 was lesser than the critical value of 1.96, which was not significant at 0.05 alpha levels. Conclusion: This study has evaluated the documentation of care using NNN in PHCs. It is imperative to state that using NNN for documentation of care is a way of showing evidence-based practice. The researcher therefore recommends that the use and documentation quality of the NNN be evaluated periodically, and corresponding feedbacks given to nurses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21522/tijnr.2015.05.01.art003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21522/tijnr.2015.05.01.art003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:护理记录是护理专业的核心,为了与其他护士以及临床学科和护理机构之间共享患者/客户信息,数据需要以标准化的形式记录和存储。因此,为了使护理人员给予的护理可见,NANDA-I、NIC和NOC被批准用于文件。目的:本研究的目的是评估NANDA-I、NIC和NOC是否被用于选定初级保健中心(phc)母婴福利部门的护理记录。方法:本研究采用回顾性描述性研究设计。采用随机抽样方法选取5个PHCs。使用NANDA-I、NIC和NOC记录的所有患者护理计划记录进行数据分析。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 17.0版本进行描述性和推断性统计。结果:采用神经网络对护理过程进行记录。NANDA-I护理诊断差异无统计学意义,NIC和NOC作为t计算值-1.00小于临界值1.96,在0.05 α水平下差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究评估了在PHCs中使用神经网络的护理记录。必须指出,使用神经网络记录护理是一种显示循证实践的方式。因此,研究者建议定期评估神经网络的使用和文件质量,并向护士提供相应的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Use of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, Nursing Outcome Classification and Nursing Intervention Classification for Documentation of Care in Primary Health Centres, Ijebu Ode
Background: Documentation of nursing care is core to the Nursing profession and to share information on patients/clients with other nurses and between clinical disciplines and care settings, data needs to be recorded and stored in a standardized form. Therefore, to make the care nurses give to be visible, NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was endorsed to be used for documentation. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether NANDA-I, NIC, & NOC was used for documentation of care at the maternal and infant welfare units of selected Primary Health Centres (PHCs). Methodology: A retrospective descriptive research design was adopted in this study. Random sampling technique was used to select 5 PHCs. All patient nursing care plan records documented with NANDA-I, NIC & NOC was utilized for data analysis. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 for both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Findings revealed that nursing care was documented using NNN. There was no significant difference in the NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, NIC & NOC used as the t calculated value of -1.00 was lesser than the critical value of 1.96, which was not significant at 0.05 alpha levels. Conclusion: This study has evaluated the documentation of care using NNN in PHCs. It is imperative to state that using NNN for documentation of care is a way of showing evidence-based practice. The researcher therefore recommends that the use and documentation quality of the NNN be evaluated periodically, and corresponding feedbacks given to nurses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization and Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine in Treatment of Malaria in Osun State Knowledge, Perception and Utilization of Herbal Medicine in Treatment of Malaria in Southwestern Nigeria Level of Well-Being among School Going Adolescents The Effects of Early Marriage on the Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Nigeria Psychological Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Performance of Nursing Staff of Mid Atlantic Wellness Institute, Bermuda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1